04.04.2013 Views

Mireille Consalvey PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mireille Consalvey PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mireille Consalvey PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(IM<br />

The balance between all these parameters and their respective effects on<br />

the fluorescence yields are still not clear, clearly further work is required to<br />

resolve these questions. However, Ser6dio et al. (1997) concluded that any effect<br />

on F, will be comparatively small compared to the large variations seen as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> migration.<br />

A dark adaptation time <strong>of</strong> 15 min was selected by Kromkamp et al.<br />

(1998), Honeywill (200 1) and Honeywill et al. (2002) aiming to achieve the fine<br />

balance between achieving a true measure <strong>of</strong> minimum fluorescence but also<br />

limiting the effect <strong>of</strong> cells dramatically changing their position. Kromkamp et al.<br />

(1998) estimated that 75% <strong>of</strong> the signal detectable by PAM fluorescence<br />

techniques emanates from the upper 150 [tm <strong>of</strong> the sediment. By considering the<br />

theoretical distance that cells might travel (Table 8.1) it can be seen that cells<br />

could travel greater than 150 pm in 15 min, therefore one cannot assume that the<br />

same population <strong>of</strong> cells will be present before and after dark adaptation. The<br />

data obtained in Chapter 7 suggested that some cells did migrate away during the<br />

15 min dark adaptation period.<br />

Table 8.1: Theoretical distances travelled<br />

Distance travelled<br />

gm<br />

Speed I min 15 mins I hour Notes<br />

GIM S-1)<br />

Happey-wood 2.5 150 2250 9000 Horizontal<br />

and Jones (19 8 8) 9 540 8100 32400<br />

Hay et al. (1993) 4.7 282 4230 16920 Horizontal<br />

0.17 10.2 153 612 Vertical<br />

0.19 11.4 171 684 Vertical<br />

Hopkins (1963) 0.28- 116.8 ] 252 1 1008 Vertical<br />

Harper (1977) 0.25 115 1 225 ] - 900 --I Vertical 1<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!