Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
110 <strong>The</strong> Autobiography <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archbishop</strong> Thomas Seeker<br />
Lord Egmont, one <strong>of</strong> his parishioners. At that time, by the undue<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> ministers and court in the legislature, he saw "as evidently<br />
as two and two make four, that our constitution is irrecoverably going.''<br />
On the other hand, by making it compulsory for members to declare on<br />
oath whether or not they had pensions, and <strong>of</strong> what sort, Seeker feared<br />
that perjury would be encouraged. Egmont thought this might be a way<br />
whereby his rector might square his conscience to vote against the bill on<br />
the next day, and to earn thereby the gratitude <strong>of</strong> the government. In the<br />
event, Seeker had supported the bill, as did his friend Benson <strong>of</strong><br />
Gloucester, and Reynolds, bishop <strong>of</strong> Lincoln {Egmont Diary III, pp.<br />
122-23, 18-19 March, 1740). <strong>The</strong> Place Bills served the same purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
opposition.<br />
Earl <strong>of</strong> Orfords Conduct: Walpole, after his defeat in January, 1742,<br />
was pensioned <strong>of</strong>f and created earl <strong>of</strong> Orford. A number <strong>of</strong> proposals<br />
between March and June 1742 to prosecute him for ministerial corruption<br />
while he was in <strong>of</strong>fice were defeated. <strong>The</strong> campaign against Walpole<br />
was abandoned after a spectacular defeat on 1 December, 1742 [A.S.<br />
Foord, His Majesty's Opposition 1714-1830 (Oxford, 1964), pp. 240-42].<br />
Select Vestries <strong>of</strong> Westminster: for the evidence at St. James's see C.J.<br />
xxiv, pp. 232-38. <strong>The</strong> vestry was complained <strong>of</strong>, as having, in years past,<br />
exceeded its legal powers, in the assessment, collection and use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
several parish rates, and in the management <strong>of</strong> special collections for the<br />
poor, an accusation which Seeker may have had in mind in his careful<br />
description <strong>of</strong> how the fund for the poor in the winter <strong>of</strong> 1739-40 had<br />
been run. <strong>The</strong>re certainly seemed to be some evidence that property <strong>of</strong><br />
vestrymen and parish <strong>of</strong>ficers was lightly assessed. <strong>The</strong> country market<br />
owned by one <strong>of</strong> the Ludbeys along with others was curiously exempt<br />
from rates and other Ludbey property semed rated favorably (p. 234).<br />
Lord Powlett, a vestryman, was even reported as having said that "we<br />
that sit at the Board must take the Burthen <strong>of</strong>f ourselves" (p. 235). On<br />
the other hand, the complainants assured the committee that they "had<br />
no Charge against the present Vestry," and that "it were much to be<br />
wished they could transmit their Integrity to their Successors" (p. 236).<br />
To christen one <strong>of</strong> the Princes Children: Seeker's return to St.<br />
James's must have been for some other reason. None <strong>of</strong> the Prince <strong>of</strong><br />
Wales's children was born between 1740 and 1743.<br />
Dr Wishart: William Wishart (d. 1753), who was elected principal and<br />
first pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> divinity at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh in 1737 and<br />
called as minister <strong>of</strong> the New Greyfriars Church probably the same year<br />
(1738?) [Hew Scott, FastiEcclesiae Scoticanae (Edinburgh, 1915), p. 140].