05.04.2013 Views

Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...

Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...

Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

120 <strong>The</strong> Autobiography <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archbishop</strong> Thomas Seeker<br />

BnMol, but was not approved <strong>of</strong> by <strong>Archbishop</strong> Potter (Ward, Georgian<br />

Oxford, pp, 140-41). He was active in the Oxfordshire election <strong>of</strong> 1754<br />

for the 44 New Interest".<br />

Dr Church: Thomas Church (1707-1756), vicar <strong>of</strong> Battersea 1740-56<br />

and prebendary <strong>of</strong> St. Paul's from 1744, who, even though he was<br />

critical <strong>of</strong> Methodism, was described by John Wesley as "a gentleman, a<br />

scholar and a Christian" [A.B. Lawson, John Wesley and the Christian<br />

Ministry (London, 1963), p. 72]. A bit <strong>of</strong> a firebrand, he is better known<br />

for his criticisms <strong>of</strong> Conyers Middleton and Bolingbroke. Seeker<br />

recommended him to Hardwicke as having "shown himself in several<br />

controversies an Orthodox man" (B.L. Add. MS 35,592, fol. 127:<br />

November 1753).<br />

firtt and second Vindications: in 1747 Conyers Middleton (1683-<br />

1750), fellow <strong>of</strong> Trinity college, Cambridge, published An Introductory<br />

Diu our it followed in December 1748 by his fuller treatise A Free Inquiry<br />

into ike Miraculous Powers, which are supposed to have subsisted in the Christian<br />

Church from the earliest ages thro 7 several succeeding centuries. As a work whic<br />

questioned later miraculous events, it produced a number <strong>of</strong> heated<br />

replies and by mid-1745 it was into its third edition. Thomas Church<br />

entered the controversy when he published in November 1749 A<br />

Vindication <strong>of</strong> the Miraculous Powers, and after Middleton's death a Second<br />

Vindication . . . against Dr. Middleton in February 1751. For his defence <strong>of</strong><br />

Christianity the university <strong>of</strong> Oxford conferred on Church a D.D.<br />

decree, [See <strong>The</strong> Monthly Catalogues from the London Magazine 1732-66, ed.<br />

D F Foxon (London, 1966 rpt.), XVII/576, XVIII/292, XVIII/532,<br />

XiX/528, XX/96].<br />

Dr Sharps Controversy: Thomas Sharp questioned Hutchinson's<br />

interpretation (see next entry) in Two Dissertations Concerning the Etymology<br />

and Scripture-Meaning <strong>of</strong> the Hebrew Words Elohim and Berith, first published<br />

in December 1750, a work which spawned a number <strong>of</strong> replies and<br />

counter defenses. <strong>The</strong> other books Seeker refers to are Mr. Hutchinson's<br />

Exposition <strong>of</strong> Cherubim (May 1755) and Discourses touching the Antiquity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Hebrew Tongue and Character (December 1755). Seeker apparently did not<br />

contribute to the two other volumes in the controversy, A Review and<br />

Defentt <strong>of</strong> two Dissertations: part 1 (September 1754) and part 2 and 3<br />

(Man hi 755).<br />

Mr Hutchinson: John Hutchinson (1674-1737) who in Moses's Principia<br />

produced a somewhat eccentric critique <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong> Isaac<br />

Newton, denying his theory <strong>of</strong> gravitation. His most notable opinion<br />

vids that Hebrew was the original human language, and that Hebrew

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!