Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
64<br />
<strong>The</strong> Autobiography <strong>of</strong> <strong>Archbishop</strong> Thomas Seeker<br />
FOLIO 86 Material in the Popish Pamphlet, he acquainted me that<br />
1767 his private Affairs did not allow him Leisure to proceed<br />
further. I then sent to desire, that he would return so much<br />
<strong>of</strong> my Papers as he had not used; which he did, though with Expressions<br />
<strong>of</strong> Regret, because they might have contributed to an additional Letter<br />
or Letters, in case the publick should call for a second Edition <strong>of</strong> his<br />
Performance: which I believe was well received. About the same time he<br />
wrote to desire my Assistance towards his getting the Place <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />
<strong>of</strong> Modern History at Oxford, in Case <strong>of</strong> Mr Spences Death, which was<br />
expected. I answered him very truly, that I was unable to serve Him, or<br />
any Person, by any application at Court, in relation to such matters.<br />
In the Summer, or Autumn, <strong>of</strong> 1 {6}767, came out another very bold<br />
Popish Pamphlet, intitled, an Apology for the Roman Catholicks <strong>of</strong><br />
Great Britain & Ireland. No body seemed disposed to answer it: little<br />
Notice was taken <strong>of</strong> it: the Ministry expressed no Indignation against it:<br />
I had no Influence with them. So I said {best leave} not much about it.<br />
My Return to the forementioned Inquiry about Papists was made,<br />
several Days before the Session <strong>of</strong> Parliament.<br />
FOLIO 87 Most <strong>of</strong> the Bishops sent theirs to Lord Shelburne soon<br />
1767 after, But he did not lay them before the House, till the<br />
Day, when they adjourned till after Christmass. Lord<br />
Radnor mentioned nothing more to me concerning his Intention <strong>of</strong><br />
moving for this Inquiry, than that he thought a like one ought to be<br />
made 7 or 10 Years afterwards, & the Results compared. On Dec. 26 I<br />
expressed to the Bishops my Hope that if his Lordship had any Motions<br />
to make in Consequence <strong>of</strong> the Returns, he would previously communicate<br />
them to us. And Bp Moss <strong>of</strong> St Davids, allied to him by Marriage,<br />
assured us, that he would. *)[But the Earl himself told the Bp <strong>of</strong> London<br />
afterwds that he had only promised to acquaint the Bishops beforehand<br />
on what Day he shd make his Motions, not what they shd be. And soon<br />
after, he said the D. <strong>of</strong> Grafton, first Lord <strong>of</strong> the Treasury, had advised<br />
him to make no Motion on this Subject in the present Session. Nor did<br />
he, nor any one else.] <strong>The</strong> Lists <strong>of</strong> Papists in my Diocese, amounted to<br />
271 men, women & children.<br />
Sevl years ago Dr S. Chandler told me, that Mr Whitefield intended<br />
to turn his Orphanhouse <strong>of</strong> Georgia into a College: on which Dr<br />
Chandler told him, that a minister <strong>of</strong> the Church <strong>of</strong> England must be at<br />
the Head <strong>of</strong> it; to which Mr Whitefield agreed. In 1765 or 1766 Ld<br />
Dartmouth spoke to me on this Subject. I had in the mean time been<br />
apprised by Dr Smith <strong>of</strong> Philadelphia, that Mr Whitefields Design was<br />
to appoint a Number <strong>of</strong> Persons by Name for the Governors &<br />
Managers <strong>of</strong> his College, who shd fill up Vacancies as they happend, &<br />
that thus it wd probably become a Methodist College.