05.04.2013 Views

Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...

Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...

Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 <strong>The</strong> Autobiography oj <strong>Archbishop</strong> Thomas Seeker<br />

had two: & keep one <strong>of</strong> them still. ^[<strong>The</strong> Bishop <strong>of</strong> Cloyne, Dr Berkeley,<br />

came to Oxford this Summer, before his Friend Bishop Bensons Death;<br />

but I think not before he went through Oxfordshire to Glocester. So that<br />

he did not see him.]<br />

In the End <strong>of</strong> September 1752 we returned to St Pauls. In the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> November, we went to the Duchess <strong>of</strong> Somersets at Percy<br />

Lodge for a few Days, & thence to Cuddesden. I had before this time<br />

given my Nephew John Frost the Vicarage <strong>of</strong> Sibert<strong>of</strong>t: where the<br />

Repairs <strong>of</strong> the Vicarage House & Chancel cost me above 50 11 . On his<br />

quitting the Curacy <strong>of</strong> Hooknorton, which he had held for some Years,<br />

Lady Susan Keck desired me to give it to Mr Mountsteven <strong>of</strong> Exeter<br />

College. I excused my self. Not long after, Mr George Talbot, son to the<br />

Chancellor, asked it for a Friend <strong>of</strong> his. I excused my self again, having<br />

another Person in View. But that Design not taking Effect, I <strong>of</strong>fered it<br />

afterwards to Mr Talbot for his Friend, if he was one disposed to favour<br />

the New Interest in the approaching Oxfordshire Election. On this he<br />

wrote me a very angry & contemptuous Letter. I returned him one<br />

calculated to mollifie him. He answered it by a worse.<br />

FOLIO 45 So I gave the Curacy to Mr Mountsteven, & have had no<br />

1752-53 Intercourse with Mr Talbot since. He did once make a visit<br />

at the Deanery <strong>of</strong> St Pauls. Whether he asked for me, or<br />

only for his Aunt & Cousin, I know not. He saw them; but saith nothing<br />

to them on what had passed between him & me. I was in the House, but<br />

did not go to him. I think reading the Letters will shew that I ought not,<br />

without some Excuse made to me for them. Bishop Talbot indeed had<br />

conferred great Favours upon me, in return for the faithful Service<br />

which I did him. And I made my Acknowledgements for them in the<br />

best Manner, that I could, by shewing Kindness to that Part <strong>of</strong> his<br />

Family, which needed & deserved it; & through the means <strong>of</strong> which I<br />

had been made known to him. Chancellor Talbot was always civil to me:<br />

& I believe wished me well. But neither he, nor any <strong>of</strong> his Sons, had<br />

either done or attempted to do me any further Favour. And the Person,<br />

whom Mr George Talbot recommended to me, proved to be very<br />

obnoxious to the Party, which I approved in that Election. And therefore<br />

I hope that I cannot be justly blamed on this Occasion.<br />

Dec. 22,23 we returned from Cuddesden to St Pauls.<br />

In the beginning <strong>of</strong> 1753 I gave my Nephew & Niece Seeker 500 11 . *)<br />

[<strong>The</strong>y were then newly married by me in St Pauls Church: & lived with<br />

me some time at the Deanery.<br />

This Spring the Marriage Act passed. I had no Concern in it, till it<br />

was printed & read a 2d time. <strong>The</strong>n I declared my Desire <strong>of</strong> its passing,<br />

but with many Amendmts, which I specified. Ld Bath said, I ought to<br />

have reserved them for the Committee. <strong>The</strong> D. <strong>of</strong> Argyl said, I did well

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!