Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
Archbishop of Canterbury - KU ScholarWorks - The University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
32 <strong>The</strong> Autobiography oj <strong>Archbishop</strong> Thomas Seeker<br />
had two: & keep one <strong>of</strong> them still. ^[<strong>The</strong> Bishop <strong>of</strong> Cloyne, Dr Berkeley,<br />
came to Oxford this Summer, before his Friend Bishop Bensons Death;<br />
but I think not before he went through Oxfordshire to Glocester. So that<br />
he did not see him.]<br />
In the End <strong>of</strong> September 1752 we returned to St Pauls. In the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> November, we went to the Duchess <strong>of</strong> Somersets at Percy<br />
Lodge for a few Days, & thence to Cuddesden. I had before this time<br />
given my Nephew John Frost the Vicarage <strong>of</strong> Sibert<strong>of</strong>t: where the<br />
Repairs <strong>of</strong> the Vicarage House & Chancel cost me above 50 11 . On his<br />
quitting the Curacy <strong>of</strong> Hooknorton, which he had held for some Years,<br />
Lady Susan Keck desired me to give it to Mr Mountsteven <strong>of</strong> Exeter<br />
College. I excused my self. Not long after, Mr George Talbot, son to the<br />
Chancellor, asked it for a Friend <strong>of</strong> his. I excused my self again, having<br />
another Person in View. But that Design not taking Effect, I <strong>of</strong>fered it<br />
afterwards to Mr Talbot for his Friend, if he was one disposed to favour<br />
the New Interest in the approaching Oxfordshire Election. On this he<br />
wrote me a very angry & contemptuous Letter. I returned him one<br />
calculated to mollifie him. He answered it by a worse.<br />
FOLIO 45 So I gave the Curacy to Mr Mountsteven, & have had no<br />
1752-53 Intercourse with Mr Talbot since. He did once make a visit<br />
at the Deanery <strong>of</strong> St Pauls. Whether he asked for me, or<br />
only for his Aunt & Cousin, I know not. He saw them; but saith nothing<br />
to them on what had passed between him & me. I was in the House, but<br />
did not go to him. I think reading the Letters will shew that I ought not,<br />
without some Excuse made to me for them. Bishop Talbot indeed had<br />
conferred great Favours upon me, in return for the faithful Service<br />
which I did him. And I made my Acknowledgements for them in the<br />
best Manner, that I could, by shewing Kindness to that Part <strong>of</strong> his<br />
Family, which needed & deserved it; & through the means <strong>of</strong> which I<br />
had been made known to him. Chancellor Talbot was always civil to me:<br />
& I believe wished me well. But neither he, nor any <strong>of</strong> his Sons, had<br />
either done or attempted to do me any further Favour. And the Person,<br />
whom Mr George Talbot recommended to me, proved to be very<br />
obnoxious to the Party, which I approved in that Election. And therefore<br />
I hope that I cannot be justly blamed on this Occasion.<br />
Dec. 22,23 we returned from Cuddesden to St Pauls.<br />
In the beginning <strong>of</strong> 1753 I gave my Nephew & Niece Seeker 500 11 . *)<br />
[<strong>The</strong>y were then newly married by me in St Pauls Church: & lived with<br />
me some time at the Deanery.<br />
This Spring the Marriage Act passed. I had no Concern in it, till it<br />
was printed & read a 2d time. <strong>The</strong>n I declared my Desire <strong>of</strong> its passing,<br />
but with many Amendmts, which I specified. Ld Bath said, I ought to<br />
have reserved them for the Committee. <strong>The</strong> D. <strong>of</strong> Argyl said, I did well