Comparative Notes on Hurro-Urartian, Northern Caucasian
Comparative Notes on Hurro-Urartian, Northern Caucasian
Comparative Notes on Hurro-Urartian, Northern Caucasian
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Latin form can be seen 323 , it seems that Hittite ßaÍtapi, if it was borrowed, might<br />
represent a corresp<strong>on</strong>ding form of a satPm Luwian dialect (*HaÍ + tap/b- < Hô´k + *p e t-<br />
r-, with loss of -r in a final n<strong>on</strong>-accented syllable and metathesis of the labial stop of the<br />
same type as in the Slavic word).<br />
There are at least two more <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Caucasian</strong> words for horse that might be<br />
compared to dialectal Indo-European terms.<br />
The local Indo-European term for “foal” *pôlo-s is found in a group of dialects but<br />
still bel<strong>on</strong>gs to the relatively old part of Indo-European technical vocabulary since it is<br />
attested in Mycenaean Greek (po-ro, Homeric p«low “foal”), Albanian pelë “mare” <<br />
*pôlnâ and in all the ancient Germanic languages: Gothic fula “foal, colt”, Old Icelandic<br />
foli (masculine), fyl < *fulja, Old English fola, Old High German folo. It seems<br />
possible to compare it to the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Caucasian</strong> *farnê, rec<strong>on</strong>structed <strong>on</strong> the basis of<br />
Avar x w áni “horses” (collective form); Khvarshi xaram “foal”; Lezghian x w ar “mare”;<br />
Western <strong>Caucasian</strong> *x w ara > Adygh fâra “thoroughbred horse”. 324 The <strong>Northern</strong><br />
<strong>Caucasian</strong> word bel<strong>on</strong>gs to a very small class of lexical items beginning with f-. From<br />
seven words included in this class in the dicti<strong>on</strong>ary by Nikolayev and Starostin, two<br />
other lexemes (the numeral “five” and the noun “fist” related to it) are also shared with<br />
Indo-European. 325 The c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> between the <strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Caucasian</strong> and Indo-European<br />
terms of this class seems bey<strong>on</strong>d doubt. To establish the directi<strong>on</strong> of borrowing <strong>on</strong>e has<br />
to keep in mind the relative chr<strong>on</strong>ology of the dispersal of<br />
323 Ernout and Meillet 1994, 5 (-i- may be explained by the use in a compound, see above <strong>on</strong> the old rule);<br />
Machek 1957, 177 (with the suggesti<strong>on</strong> p et-r- > *trep- > *-trebb- and of a later change of the geminate *ebb-<br />
> -2b-); in Hittite the single -p- points to a former voiced (or glottalized) ph<strong>on</strong>eme. However,<br />
according to Vey, the Slavic group st < *pt-, which would have explained jasËt- < asËst- < ô´kË-pt-, but<br />
in that case the labial stop bel<strong>on</strong>gs not to the root in the Slavic word, but to the suffix *-emb(h)-.<br />
324 Nikolayev and Starostin 1994, 425-426. On the Indo-European word, see Lehmann 1986, 130.<br />
325 Starostin 1988, 119.