Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto
Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto
Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
114<br />
14. emiliozzi 1992, p. 102, fig. 21; emiliozzi 1997a, p. 97, fig. 2;<br />
Camerin and emiliozzi 1997, no. 25 (with bibliography). The chariot<br />
has not yet been reconstructed either physically or graphically,<br />
although i have examined all the remains, and the type of rails<br />
used is clear.<br />
15. Thus far eight type a chariots other than the one from monteleone<br />
have been reconstructed, either physically or graphically. Four<br />
were exhibited in the three venues of the exhibition “Carri da<br />
guerra e principi etruschi”; see emiliozzi 1997, pp. 139ff. (from<br />
Vulci), 155ff. (from Populonia), 203ff. (from Castro), and 207ff.<br />
(from Castel San mariano). i reconstructed the example from<br />
narce that is now on <strong>di</strong>splay at the museo nazionale etrusco <strong>di</strong><br />
Villa Giulia in rome (Camerin and emiliozzi 1997, no. 203; an<br />
unlikely wheel that was not properly checked in the reconstruction<br />
is illustrated correctly in the explanatory panel i e<strong>di</strong>ted and<br />
published in de lucia 1998, pp. 34 – 35, fig. 48). The other three<br />
are from Vetulonia (Cygielman and Pagnini 2006, pp. 34 – 44,<br />
figs. 9, 10), matelica (de marinis and Palermo 2008), and Capua<br />
(the dutuit chariot; see emiliozzi 2006). of type B chariots only<br />
the example from the Via appia antica in rome has been physically<br />
reconstructed (emiliozzi 1997, pp. 191ff.).<br />
16. The ear-loop side rails seem also to have been present during the<br />
etruscan orientalizing period, in the chariot from the regolini<br />
Galassi Tomb at Cerveteri (Camerin and emiliozzi 1997, no. 103),<br />
which is now being stu<strong>di</strong>ed so that it can be reconstructed both<br />
graphically and physically, and perhaps also in the one from the<br />
Bernar<strong>di</strong>ni Tomb at Praeneste (emiliozzi 1992, p. 102). For the<br />
archaic period we need only cite the chariot from the Via appia<br />
antica outside rome (see note 15 above) and the contemporary<br />
representation in relief with incision on the proper left side panel<br />
of the chariot from monteleone <strong>di</strong> <strong>Spoleto</strong> (cat. 4, Figures V.30,<br />
V.32, and especially i.25).<br />
17. emiliozzi 1996b and 1997a, p. 96, fig. 1.<br />
18. For the war chariot from Populonia, see emiliozzi 1997c, figs. 4, 5,<br />
pl. Vi; for the Capua vehicle, see Camerin and emiliozzi 1997,<br />
no. 11 (with bibliography), and emiliozzi 2006. among the representations,<br />
the stele from the Certosa of Bologna (Sprenger and<br />
Bartoloni 1977, fig. 206) is eloquent of the persistence over time of<br />
the use of leather straps when the chariot box was composed only<br />
of wood and leather.<br />
19. See note 15 above. For the Vulci chariot, see especially emiliozzi<br />
1997b, figs. 13, 16, pl. iii.<br />
20. For examples, see Winter 2009, nos. 5.d.2.a,c, 5.d.3.a,c, and<br />
Figure ii.16. i have deliberately excluded from consideration here<br />
the racing chariots known from representations (see Bronson<br />
1965, Jannot 1984, and decker 1991), although in these cases,<br />
too, the side rails <strong>di</strong>d not serve as handrails because the driver<br />
balanced himself by leaning his knees against the front panel.<br />
21. on the chariot represented on the etruscan hydria in the museum<br />
of Fine arts in Boston (01.8062; Fairbanks 1928, no. 573), which has<br />
been associated with the style of the micali Painter by Spivey (1987,<br />
p. 31), this part is made of a bent branch. in other representations<br />
it either has the same form found on the excavated vehicles or is<br />
absent (although in those cases we cannot be sure if it was actually<br />
missing or if the artist omitted it to simplify the representation).<br />
22. representations of racing chariots do not appear in italy until the<br />
beginning of the third quarter of the sixth century B.C. (see<br />
Bronson 1965 and Stary 1980). The closest comparisons with<br />
parade chariots can be found in terracotta friezes; see Winter<br />
2009, pp. 353ff. (590 – 520 B.C.).<br />
23. Clear syntheses of etruscan and roman social history from the<br />
sixth century B.C. are offered by Torelli 1981b, pp. 139 – 81,<br />
Colonna 1985, and menichetti 2000.<br />
24. emiliozzi 2006.<br />
25. For the near east and egypt, see littauer and Crouwel 1979,<br />
pp. 50ff., 62ff., 74ff., 101ff., 144ff.; 1985, especially pp. 67ff.; and<br />
1997 (synthesis). For Cyprus, see Crouwel 1987. For Greece, see<br />
Spruytte 1978 (the results of his experiments with harness systems)<br />
and Crouwel 1992. reconstructions to date of etruscan-italic chariots<br />
(see note 15 above) demonstrate that the same system was adopted.<br />
26. emiliozzi 1997b and 1997c. The reconstructions do not reproduce<br />
the leather thongs that were certainly used to reinforce the mortise<br />
joints at the front of the floor frame.<br />
27. emiliozzi 1997b, pl. V.1. The principle is the same in egyptian chariots;<br />
see littauer and Crouwel 1985, especially p. 67, no. 3,<br />
pl. lXiX bottom (chariot from the Tomb of Yuia and Tuiu), and<br />
Spruytte 1983, pp. 24 – 40 (the results of his experiments).<br />
28. These sheets have not been published. Stopponi Simonetta provided<br />
information about them and showed images of them during<br />
her presentation on april 9, 2010, on the tenth season of excavations<br />
at Campo della Fiera at orvieto.<br />
29. emiliozzi 1997, p. 296, no. 9 (mistakenly counted among the<br />
bronze sheets from the chariot box). That it came from a chariot<br />
became clear to me after examining in 1998 and reexamining in<br />
2005 the remains of the two vehicles now in the ny Carlsberg<br />
Glyptotek in Copenhagen.<br />
30. in ad<strong>di</strong>tion to the monteleone chariot, see the ones from the Via<br />
appia antica in rome (emiliozzi 1997e) and Castel San mariano<br />
(emiliozzi 1997f).<br />
31. The shock-absorbing system is clearly visible in Crouwel 2010, figs<br />
a – d (chariots on terracotta plaques), and Höckmann 1982, pl. 30<br />
(left side of the image; the example from Castel San mariano). This<br />
feature was not understood and thus not included in the drawing<br />
Höckmann published as fig. 25 on p. 43.<br />
32. For examples of metal rings, see emiliozzi 1997a, figs. 1 (see also<br />
emiliozzi 1996b and Figure ii.12) and 4 (see also de lucia 1998).<br />
The following finds are similar to these: Camerin and emiliozzi<br />
1997, nos. 21, 28, 58, 130, 143, 146, 166, 189(?), 203, 208, 212, 255.<br />
For examples of pegs, see emiliozzi 1997c, pp. 165ff., figs. 4, 5,<br />
pl. Vi (Populonia, Tumolo dei Carri; see Figure ii.13). The following<br />
bronze finials have a function similar to these pegs: Camerin and<br />
emiliozzi 1997, nos. 24, 172, 198, 227, 238, 241, 242, 244, 245.<br />
33. This system is similar to that of the Greek four-horse teams that<br />
were the subject of Spruytte’s 1978 experiments. See also Crouwel<br />
1992, p. 14, fig. 1. in this figure, once the traces pass through the<br />
leather hoops and enter the chariot car they are tied to the ends of<br />
the side rails. on p. 44n181 Crouwel corrects the reconstruction<br />
proposed by Spruytte in 1983, ill. pp. 62 – 63.<br />
34. Colonna 1997, p. 17, fig. 2; Winter 2009, pp. 288 – 92, no. 4.d.8.g<br />
(where the traces are mistakenly interpreted as a second pole<br />
exten<strong>di</strong>ng from the front of the chariot).<br />
35. Winter 2009, nos. 5.d.1.e,f; 5.d.2.a – d; 5.d.3.a – d.<br />
36. For scenes that contain chariots, see Winter 2009. etruscan cities:<br />
acquarossa (nos. 4.d.4.a – d), Caere (nos. 4.d.7.a, 4.d.8.g, 6.d.1.a),<br />
Castel d’asso (no. 4.d.4.b), Castellina del marangone (nos. 4.d.4.a,c),<br />
orvieto (nos. 5.d.1.b,f; 5.d.5.c), Poggio Buco (nos. 4.d.5.a,b),<br />
Pyrgi (no. 4.d.8.g), rusellae (nos. 4.d.4.a,c; 5.d.1.f; 5.d.4.a;<br />
5.d.5.c), Tarquinia (nos. 4.d.4.a; 4.d.6.b,d; 4.d.8.b,c; 5.d.4.b;<br />
5.d.5.d,e), Tuscania (nos. 4.d.4.a,c; 4.d.6.a,c; 4.d.6.d?), Veii<br />
(nos. 4.d.1.a,b; 4.d.2.a,b; 4.d.2.c – e; 5.a.1.a; 5.d.2.a,c), and Vulci<br />
(no. 4.d.5.a). latin cities: Caprifico, Cisterna (nos. 5.d.1.b,e,f;<br />
5.d.3.b,d), Ficana (no. 4.d.4.e), Palestrina (nos. 5.a.3.b; 5.d.1.a),<br />
roma (nos. 5.a.1.f; 5.d.1.a,e,f; 5.d.2.a,c,d; 5.d.3.a,c), Satricum<br />
(no. 6.d.1.a), and Velletri (nos. 5.d.1.a; 5.d.2.a – c; 5.d.3.a).<br />
37. “Wagendarstellungen” in Woytowitsch 1978, pp. 80 – 107, offers a<br />
list of representations of this material; it will soon be superseded<br />
by the forthcoming Chariots and Other Wheeled Vehicles in Italy<br />
before the Roman Empire, by Joost Crouwel. objects with narrative<br />
scenes, some of them mythological, dated between the late<br />
seventh and the first half of the sixth century B.C. include two<br />
amphorae from Trevignano (Colonna 1985, p. 245, no. 9.3, ills.<br />
p. 247); an etruscan-Corinthian oinochoe (Szilágyi 1992, p. 122,