06.04.2013 Views

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

V.62 Bronze fragments as<br />

reconstructed on the left rear<br />

side panel<br />

92<br />

slightly dented left horn. These were made in antiquity so<br />

that the bronze sheet could be pulled out with a small<br />

rounded tool to restore the lost volume of the dented relief.<br />

The notch in the area of the cut-off tail overlaps the lion’s<br />

tail on the frieze (cat. 12) and obliterates its tip.<br />

15. Fragments of two rear side panels (Figure V.62)<br />

Bronze and ivory (lost)<br />

reconstructed panels: H. 4 7⁄8 in. (12.5 cm), l. 5 ¾ in.<br />

(14.7 cm) ± 3⁄8 in. (1 cm), thickness of wood 3⁄8 in. (.9 cm);<br />

edging of longer side: l. as preserved 5 5⁄8 in. (14.4 cm),<br />

W. 3⁄8 in. (.9 cm); edging of shorter side: l. as preserved<br />

4 5⁄8 in. (11.6 cm), W. 3⁄8 in. (.9 cm); fragment of sheet<br />

(recomposed): 4 5⁄8 x 2 1⁄8 in. (11.7 x 5.5 cm)<br />

These two panels were not included in the reconstruction of<br />

the chariot in 1903. Their original position had not been<br />

understood, and some of their bronze remains were used to<br />

repair losses in other sections of the chariot. of the flat sheet<br />

bronze that originally made up the rear side panels only two<br />

pieces were identified with relative certainty after the chariot<br />

was <strong>di</strong>sassembled in 2002. despite the evident <strong>di</strong>fferences,<br />

two segments from their edgings had been mounted<br />

onto the side panels (cats. 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b; see Section i.G).<br />

The certainty that these segments of edgings belong to the<br />

chariot is supported by a third matching segment in italy<br />

that was recovered after the tomb was reopened in 1907<br />

(Figure i.16). as no available evidence in<strong>di</strong>cates how the<br />

few surviving fragments should be allocated between the<br />

two rear side panels, in the recent reconstruction it was<br />

decided to attach all of them to the proper left panel.<br />

Description. This is a flat sheet without tracing. Three small<br />

nail holes (one of which was reused in 1903) can be seen at<br />

regular intervals along the ancient edge; farther from the<br />

edge are two pairs of larger holes ( 1⁄8 in. [.35 cm]), one of<br />

which was reused in 1903. The other holes, which are scattered<br />

over the sheet, are all modern (1903 restoration). The<br />

original sheet joined one of the two panels (cat. 3a or 4a) on<br />

one side and lined up with a frieze (cat. 11 or 12) at the base<br />

(nothing is known about its profile). The two free sides were<br />

finished with edging worked in two parts, joined at the<br />

angle where they met, and nailed to the wooden support at<br />

regular intervals.<br />

Con<strong>di</strong>tion. one of the segments of the edging, which preserves<br />

a finished end, is almost intact, while both ends of<br />

the other are incomplete. The sheet-metal fragment has been<br />

recomposed from two pieces that were cut in 1903 and<br />

placed at two <strong>di</strong>fferent points under the revetment of the<br />

right side of the chariot. The sheet is uniformly covered with<br />

brown and black corrosion layers and also with patchy<br />

areas of massive green corrosion. Some areas of metallic<br />

surface also remain. a solder line is visible along the original<br />

edge.<br />

Technical observations. The solder is certainly ancient,<br />

because the function the fragment served in 1903 <strong>di</strong>d not<br />

require soldering. i believe that the two pairs of 1⁄8 in.<br />

(.35 cm) holes served to secure some other decoration of a<br />

<strong>di</strong>fferent material. For example, similar holes are found in<br />

etruscan ivory inlays that were meant to be attached to a<br />

support by pins, also made of ivory. 7<br />

16. Draft pole (Figures V.63, V.64)<br />

l. without head of bird of prey at front end 81¾ in.<br />

(207.5 cm), circumference of bronze sheet 10¼ – 7 7⁄8 in.<br />

(26 – 20 cm); <strong>di</strong>am. of wooden reconstruction 3 1⁄2 – 2¾ in.<br />

(9 – 7 cm)<br />

Description. Two sheets of <strong>di</strong>fferent lengths (61 5⁄8 in. and<br />

20 1⁄8 in. [156.5 cm and 51 cm]) sheathed the lost wooden<br />

pole and were attached to it by a row of nails running along<br />

the edges on the underside. These edges do not fit together,<br />

nor do they overlap, as had been thought in the reconstruction<br />

of 1903. That the space, approximately ¾ in. (2 cm)<br />

wide, left between the edges was filled with an ivory strip is<br />

confirmed by eyewitnesses, who saw the remains of the<br />

chariot at the time of the excavation. The shape of the<br />

pole — bent at an angle in the forward third — called for two<br />

pieces of metal. The section of the pole is not exactly circular,<br />

but slightly horizontally oval, and the <strong>di</strong>ameter <strong>di</strong>minishes<br />

from the boar protome to the finial. The wide end of<br />

the bronze sheathing begins just below the floor frame at<br />

the front of the chariot. The top part of the sheathing at the<br />

wide end is cut to accommodate the various lashings covered<br />

by the boar protome. The cut even includes rectangular<br />

openings for the tusks. The numerous nail holes running<br />

along the edges of the cut, originally used to attach the protome<br />

placed on top, were reused in the 1903 restoration.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!