06.04.2013 Views

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

they are superimposed, creating an imbricated sequence:<br />

the more strokes are superimposed, the less evident their triangular<br />

shape (Figures iii.14, iii.13). The scales of the birds’<br />

plumage were rendered not by a single hammer stroke on<br />

a curved point, but by serried strokes of a straight-pointed<br />

tracer. The length of the triangles can be measured at the<br />

end of the lines (and in accidental strokes): they are generally<br />

.6 mm long, but .4 mm long in the eyelashes and eyebrows<br />

of the human and animal faces, and in the warrior’s<br />

moustache. in rare cases the tracing creates a row of single<br />

marks rather than a line, as in the plumage on the legs of the<br />

birds of prey (observed by microscopic examination of the<br />

left bird’s feather; see Figure iii.33).exceptionally, the tool’s<br />

point produced small lines that barely assumed the triangular<br />

shape and increased in length to 3 mm. round-ended<br />

tools made punched dots of various sizes: .8 mm dots in the<br />

lower border of the woman’s chiton; .5 mm dots (observed<br />

by microscopic examination of the rows of dots in the woman’s<br />

sleeve, but used as a rule in the rows of the same type of<br />

dots, as shown by Figures iii.22, iii.27); .5 – .3 mm dots (the<br />

dot rosettes, executed using a number of <strong>di</strong>fferent tools, and<br />

all the fields of dots, produced by repeatedly hammering a<br />

single tool with <strong>di</strong>fferent amounts of force).<br />

it is not easy to judge if the inconsistency among the<br />

hundreds of lines produced by thousands of strokes are a<br />

result of a single engraver’s fatigue or of the <strong>di</strong>fferent degrees<br />

of skill among assistants. The same goes for understandable<br />

moments of <strong>di</strong>straction, such as the lack of dots in the hourglasses<br />

along the border of the warrior’s right sleeve, on<br />

which, as previously mentioned, the hourglasses are all<br />

horizontal, unlike those decorating the left sleeve.<br />

Inlay. one of the ivory fragments that came to the metropolitan<br />

museum with the bronze panels of the chariot<br />

seems to belong to the gorgoneion’s teeth (cat. 22). The gorgoneion’s<br />

tongue is in the museo archeologico, Florence,<br />

as is the panther’s right eye, which no longer contains the<br />

material formerly inserted into the iris and pupil (see Figures<br />

i.13, i.14). accor<strong>di</strong>ng to reports made at the time of the<br />

clandestine excavation, there seem to have been ivory<br />

inlays along the edge of the panel; two of the fragments that<br />

arrived in new York fit the flat bronze surface at the sides of<br />

the shield (cats. 21a, 21b). The absence of rivet holes in<strong>di</strong>cates<br />

that the inserts were slotted in and glued, though no<br />

traces of the adhesive have survived.<br />

Shape. The curvature of the panel echoes that of the upper<br />

half of the shield that Thetis is hol<strong>di</strong>ng. The curvature of the<br />

panel at its base is of the same width and depth as the curvature<br />

at the top. 2<br />

Composition of the figures. The figures are placed perfectly<br />

symmetrically: the two human figures mirror each other on<br />

either side of a vertical axis marked by the shield with the<br />

helmet at the top and the three-<strong>di</strong>mensional boar head at V.10 edging of the central panel<br />

the bottom. The birds of prey and the deer are positioned,<br />

respectively, above and below two horizontal lines that<br />

intersect the vertical axis. The monotony that could have<br />

resulted from such a rigid schema was avoided by making<br />

the tails and wings of the birds of prey, the woman’s back<br />

and chiton, and the warrior’s shoulder, curls, buttock, and<br />

leg overlap the border. Careful examination reveals details<br />

that were applied to create symmetry and harmony: the artist<br />

cropped the length of the single segments of the locks<br />

framing the Gorgon’s head to prevent the woman’s hand,<br />

which is placed a little higher on the shield than the man’s,<br />

from partially covering the monster’s hair.<br />

1b. Edging of central panel (Figure V.10)<br />

Perimeter 48 1⁄2 in. (123 cm), W. 5⁄8 in. (1.6 cm)<br />

Description. The inverted-u-shaped band that runs around<br />

the curved part of the panel forms an obtuse angle in section.<br />

The holes at regular intervals on top of the edging were<br />

for nails that secured the panel to the lost wooden railings.<br />

a notch made by the bronzeworker to mark the midpoint,<br />

perhaps before ben<strong>di</strong>ng the band, is visible at the top of the<br />

curve.<br />

Con<strong>di</strong>tion. almost all the edging is made from fragments<br />

pieced together, with a section missing near the top of the<br />

curve. none of the ten original nails survive; the current<br />

ones were inserted during the 1903 restoration. The edging<br />

is primarily covered with brown tarnish and areas of metallic<br />

surface with scattered areas of heavy green corrosion.<br />

The <strong>Monteleone</strong> Chariot V: Catalogue 71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!