06.04.2013 Views

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

Journal - Comune di Monteleone di Spoleto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V.65 eagle head from the end<br />

of the pole, right profile<br />

94<br />

Con<strong>di</strong>tion. The longer sheet is broken into two pieces.<br />

The numerous cracks and metal losses were filled in during<br />

the recent restoration. For unknown reasons, a corner<br />

of the sheet of the shorter piece was removed in ancient<br />

times from near the join attaching it to the longer piece.<br />

The sheet is primarily yellow metal with transitions to thin<br />

brown tarnish and black corrosion. Scattered areas of massive<br />

green corrosion are also evident overall. a pattern of<br />

<strong>di</strong>agonal ban<strong>di</strong>ng along the front end of the pole shows<br />

significantly less green corrosion and in<strong>di</strong>cates a wrapping<br />

that protected the metallic surface. There is an accumulation<br />

of iron corrosion at the bottom center edge, near the<br />

area where the pole is attached.<br />

Technical observations. The area where the pole and the<br />

boar protome joined was carefully examined during the<br />

recent restoration. The placement and correspondence of<br />

all the nail holes on the sheathing and the protome were<br />

recorded, revealing that in antiquity there were three <strong>di</strong>fferent<br />

positions for the boar on the pole (see also cat. 2a). in<br />

the earliest position, the protome was all the way back, its<br />

rear edge flush with the edge of the sheet of the pole. The<br />

edge of the sheet of the pole is hammered and wavy, not<br />

cut. The second position is with the boar farther forward and<br />

covering a later, chisel-cut opening in the pole under the<br />

boar’s snout. The back of the boar protome was cut with a<br />

chisel to establish a <strong>di</strong>fferent angle for the pole. The third<br />

position for the boar — the final one before the chariot was<br />

buried — is a slight mo<strong>di</strong>fication of the second. The same<br />

nail holes were used on the proper right side of the pole, but<br />

on the proper left side the protome was set a little lower<br />

down on the pole, creating a new set of nail holes. a further<br />

mo<strong>di</strong>fication to the boar protome was observed. its crest<br />

was cut to create a slightly concave profile so it could fit<br />

over the deer on the front panel, suggesting that in the first<br />

position the boar protome slightly overlapped the deer. The<br />

angle of the pole in the first position was less acute than in<br />

the other two positions — that is, the pole was lower — and,<br />

in the first instance, perhaps no horses were yoked to it;<br />

they would have had to be very small. Thus, the chariot was<br />

used with the pole in the two later positions, possibly with<br />

two pairs of horses taking turns drawing it. The last pair may<br />

have measured between 44 1⁄8 in. and 45 ¼ in. (112 cm and<br />

115 cm) at the withers. Traces of <strong>di</strong>agonal bands around the<br />

shorter piece of the pole revetment were left by the straps,<br />

perhaps of rawhide, that lashed the yoke to the pole.<br />

Inlay. The fragments in cat. 23a (Figure V.76), which are<br />

provided with holes for bronze nails, may belong to the<br />

ivory segments attached to the underside of the pole’s revetment.<br />

Traces left on the bronze in<strong>di</strong>cate how the strip was<br />

attached. on one edge the ivory was placed between the<br />

bronze sheet and the wooden pole (or between the sheet<br />

and the leather layer covering the wood) and attached by<br />

nails. on the other edge, where only the sheet was attached<br />

with nails, the segments of the ivory overlapped freely to<br />

prevent them from breaking under stress. if this reconstruction<br />

is correct, the entire ivory strip was probably about<br />

1 5⁄8 in. (4 cm) wide, and only 1 1⁄8 in. (3 cm) of it was visible.<br />

17. Eagle head (Figures V.65– V.67)<br />

l. 5 1⁄8 in. (13 cm), <strong>di</strong>am. 2 1⁄2 – 2 3⁄4 in. (6.5 – 7 cm)<br />

Description. The embossed finial decorating the front end of<br />

the pole is made from a single piece of bronze. nail holes,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!