09.04.2013 Views

Ambergris Caye Belize Resort Development - Department of ...

Ambergris Caye Belize Resort Development - Department of ...

Ambergris Caye Belize Resort Development - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

description <strong>of</strong> the property. The situation <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> fishlife in the lagoon has also been<br />

cited by Grimshaw and Paz [2004] as the experience <strong>of</strong> other authors. It would be very unlikely<br />

that there would be no fishlife in the lagoon, since although it is understandable that ecological<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> the lagoon would change over annual cycles and longer time frames, it is unlikely<br />

that the changes encountererd, including that <strong>of</strong> fishing pressures, would be <strong>of</strong> a magnitude or<br />

orientation to completely wiped out the fish stocks from the area [Pers. comm.., G. Myvett].<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the species encountered are stenohaline stocks that are incapable <strong>of</strong> withstanding<br />

freshwater influences and in general large shifts in salinity. The species encountererd by the<br />

Tunich Nah Survey Team, as well as those cited by Grimshaw and Paz [2004], typically<br />

includes reef species such as the Blue Tang (Acanthurus coeruleus), the Dog Snapper<br />

(Lutjanus jocu), and the Hogfish (Lachnolaimus maximus), as well as oceanic stocks such as<br />

the Greater Amberjack (Seriola dumerili), the Dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) and the<br />

Houndfish (Tylosurus crocodilus) [See Table 2.4].<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the euryhaline species, which can adjust to low salinity circumstances, and which can<br />

tolerate relatively wide variations in salinity, that were listed by Grimshaw and Paz [2004]<br />

were not seen or reported anectdotally by the Tunich Nah Survey Team for the proposed<br />

project area. These include species such as the Tarpon (Megalops atlanticus), the Snook<br />

(Centropomus undecimalis) and the White Mullet (Mugil curema) [See Table 2.4].<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> euryhaline stocks in the Grimshaw and Paz endeavour [2004] relates to the<br />

fact that it is unlikely that these species were recorded in the immediate project area: Given the<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> habitats and the expansive extent <strong>of</strong> the wider Bacalar Chico National Park and<br />

Marine Reserve [BCNP/MR], it is likely that the euryhaline stocks were documented or<br />

reported for some locale other than the current project site that would be characterized by low<br />

salinities and consequently significant freshwater inputs.<br />

2.3.1.2.2.2 Reptiles and Amphibians<br />

Grimshaw and Paz [2004] cited the existence <strong>of</strong> 33 reptiles in the larger BCNP/MR: These<br />

included 15 species <strong>of</strong> snakes and 1 crocodilian [See Table 2.5]. The Tunich Nah Survey Team<br />

documented 5 species <strong>of</strong> reptiles, with 2 species <strong>of</strong> snakes and no crocodilian [See Table 2.5].<br />

The limited number <strong>of</strong> reptilian species documented on the project site is a function <strong>of</strong> the size<br />

<strong>of</strong> the property, geography and ecological characterization. The property is a relatively thin<br />

strip <strong>of</strong> land with the sea on one side and a lagoon on the other. It’s geographic placement and<br />

size does not allow for the diversity and geographic extent <strong>of</strong> habitats that would allow for a<br />

wide array <strong>of</strong> species.<br />

The most abundant species documented by the Tunich Nah Team was the Wish-Willy, Spinytail<br />

Iguana (Ctenosaura similis), followed by the Smooth-Scaled Gecko<br />

2-55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!