11.04.2013 Views

Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America

Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America

Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

structures, isolated sink-fills, and faults record the presence <strong>of</strong> stratigraphic units that are missing<br />

regionally. Upper Ordovician to middle Silurian clasts are incorporated into the Decaturville<br />

breccia (pre-Devonian impact) in lower Ordovician country rock. Middle Devonian marine<br />

sandstone filled a sink in lower Ordovician dolomite near Rolla. Upper Devonian Chattanooga<br />

Shale blanketed the eroded western Ozark platform. Most <strong>of</strong> this unit was removed below the<br />

sub-Mississippian unconformity in the central Ozarks but was preserved in an embayment that<br />

we informally refer to as the Northwest Arkansas Basin. Clasts <strong>of</strong> Chattanooga Shale have been<br />

recovered from the Weaubleau breccia (mid-Mississippian impact), a thin interval is preserved<br />

along the Highlandville Fault, along the lower Buffalo River, and in sink-fills in northern Arkansas.<br />

During the Early Mississippian, continued flexure resulted in back-stepping <strong>of</strong> the shelf margin,<br />

so deep-water facies accumulated on erosional remnants or peritidal lower Paleozoic strata. Major<br />

faults in southern Missouri are associated <strong>with</strong> some anomalous units <strong>of</strong> sandstone, limestone, or<br />

olistoliths, providing a record <strong>of</strong> syn-tectonic sedimentation.<br />

2-3 8:40 AM Pennington, Wayne D. [218074]<br />

THE MENOMINEE CRACK AND CLINTONVILLE BOOMS: SEISMIC EVENTS IN MICHIGAN’S<br />

UPPER PENINSULA AND NORTHEASTERN WISCONSIN<br />

PENNINGTON, Wayne D., <strong>Geological</strong> and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan<br />

Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931, wayne@mtu.edu<br />

and WAITE, Gregory P., <strong>Geological</strong> and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan<br />

Technological Univ, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> its reputation as an aseismic area, there were intriguing occurrences <strong>of</strong> seismic events<br />

in Upper Michigan and northern Wisconsin in 2010 and 2012. Although these two occurrences<br />

were only about 100 km apart, there is no evidence indicating that they are related or even due to<br />

a similar mechanism.<br />

The Menominee Crack: On October 4, 2010, a loud noise and shaking were observed in an<br />

area north <strong>of</strong> Menominee. This was associated <strong>with</strong> the appearance <strong>of</strong> 110m long crack at the<br />

crest <strong>of</strong> a ridge, 1.5m in height and up to 9m wide. The crack is apparently a surficial feature,<br />

resulting from stretching <strong>of</strong> the uppermost soil and clay layers to accommodate the creation <strong>of</strong><br />

a ridge at some shallow depth. A reasonable model (first proposed by Dr. Norm Sleep) is that<br />

the limestone underneath the clay experienced a “pop-up” due to high lateral stresses. Usually,<br />

pop-ups occur as a result <strong>of</strong> recent unloading, as at the base <strong>of</strong> a quarry or immediately following<br />

glacial retreat; neither <strong>of</strong> these describes this site, so the cause remains speculative.<br />

Clintonville Booms: Residents <strong>of</strong> Clintonville began hearing infrequent deep, rumbling sounds<br />

on March 18, 2012; the booms were sometimes accompanied by felt shaking. Following a<br />

relatively large event on March 20 that was clearly a M1.5 earthquake, four seismometers and<br />

eight sound sensors were deployed <strong>with</strong>in and around Clintonville to improve the locations <strong>of</strong><br />

subsequent events. Two events were located beneath the southeastern part <strong>of</strong> Clintonville at less<br />

than 1 km below the surface <strong>with</strong>in the granitic basement. These events were close enough to<br />

the surface so that seismic energy <strong>of</strong> sufficiently high frequency coupled to the atmosphere and<br />

propagated as sound. The Clintonville booms were indeed due to earthquakes, most <strong>of</strong> which<br />

were too small to record.<br />

2-4 9:00 AM Tupper, M. Tobias [218762]<br />

IDENTIFICATION OF LOW-LEVEL SEISMICITY IN OHIO<br />

TUPPER, M. Tobias, <strong>Geological</strong> Sciences, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Laboratories,<br />

Athens, OH 45701, mt833511@ohio.edu and GREEN, Douglas H., Dept. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geological</strong><br />

Sciences, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger, Athens, OH 45701<br />

OhioSeis records are examined to identify previously undocumented low-level earthquakes in<br />

Ohio and surrounding regions. Records are scanned at multiple stations (at least four) to identify<br />

peak amplitude arrivals <strong>with</strong>in a time window specified by the lowest likely arrival phase velocity<br />

and the maximum inter-station distance. A potential arrival peak must have an amplitude <strong>of</strong><br />

at least 1.5 times the RMS amplitude over an entire hour containing that peak. The location<br />

(epicenter) <strong>of</strong> the potential earthquake is obtained using a velocity-independent-arrival-orderlocation<br />

(AOL) technique. The event is classified as a probable earthquake if it is similarly<br />

identified and located using a different set <strong>of</strong> four stations.<br />

Five probable earthquakes in 2011 were each identified using at least five combinations <strong>of</strong><br />

stations <strong>of</strong> four seismic stations. This includes the documented 2011 New Year’s Eve M4.0 event<br />

in Youngstown OH, which was located by this technique <strong>with</strong>in 14 km and 10 seconds <strong>of</strong> the<br />

epicenter and origin time reported by the USGS. An additional three events were identified using<br />

at least three sets <strong>of</strong> four stations, and thirteen possible 2011 earthquakes were identified using<br />

two sets <strong>of</strong> four stations. Most <strong>of</strong> these locations extend from Lake Erie up the Cuyahoga Valley,<br />

through east-central Ohio towards Marietta OH.<br />

2-5 9:20 AM Malcuit, Robert J. [217936]<br />

A JUPITER ORBIT -- LUNAR ORBIT RESONANCE MODEL: POSSIBLE CAUSE FOR THE<br />

BEGINNING OF THE MODERN STYLE OF PLATE TECTONICS<br />

MALCUIT, Robert J., Geosciences Department, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023,<br />

malcuit@denison.edu<br />

Since the Plate Tectonics Revolution in the earth sciences, there has been this lingering debate<br />

about when plate tectonics began. There are two end-member schools <strong>of</strong> thought: (1) that plate<br />

tectonics has been operating throughout geologic time (Shervais, 2006, GSA SP-405, p. 173)<br />

and (2) that plate tectonics, as we understand it today, can only occur when the Earth has cooled<br />

sufficiently to permit plates to attain negative buoyancy (Davies, 1992, Geology, 20, p. 963; Stern,<br />

2005, Geology, 33, p. 556). Stern (2005) proposes that the modern style <strong>of</strong> plate tectonics began<br />

~1.0 Ga ago.<br />

The Late Proterozoic also appears to be a critical time in the history <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit. Peale<br />

and Cassen (1978, Icarus, 36, p. 245) identified an orbital resonance state between Jupiter’s<br />

orbit and the lunar orbit when the lunar orbital radius is at 53.4 ER (earth radii). Orbital traceback<br />

calculations suggest that the earth-moon distance would be ~53.4 ER in Late Proterozoic time.<br />

The key element in such an orbital resonance is the perigean cycle <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit (the<br />

prograde progression <strong>of</strong> the perigee position <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit). At present the perigean cycle is<br />

8.85 years (60.3 ER). At 53.4 ER the perigean cycle would be ~12 years, the approximate period<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jupiter’s orbit. Under these conditions the major axis <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit would be increased to<br />

the resonant value by a forced ECC (eccentricity) but the orbital angular momentum would remain<br />

near that <strong>of</strong> a 50 ER orbit and then slowly increase in time to that <strong>of</strong> a 53.4 ER orbit. As the lunar<br />

orbital ECC reaches a maximum <strong>of</strong> up to ~0.3, the rock and ocean tidal amplitudes would be<br />

~2.5 times higher than that <strong>of</strong> a circular orbit <strong>of</strong> 53.4 ER. Such rock tidal activity could lead to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> tidal vorticity induction cells in the upper mantle (Bostrom, 2000, Oxford Univ.<br />

Press) that would aid in the initiation <strong>of</strong> subduction.<br />

This model can be tested via the tidal rhythmite record <strong>of</strong> the Late Proterozoic. The two<br />

predictable constants are that the semi-major axis <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit should be near 53.4 ER<br />

and the number <strong>of</strong> sidereal months per year should be about 16 throughout this era. Assuming<br />

that the earth rotation rate at 1.1 Ga (before the forced ECC episode) is ~16.9 hr/d, the number<br />

SESSION NO. 3<br />

<strong>of</strong> days per year would change from ~519 d/yr at ~1.1 Ga to 466 d/yr at the end <strong>of</strong> this orbital<br />

resonance era.<br />

SESSION NO. 3, 8:00 AM<br />

Thursday, 2 May 2013<br />

T4. Quaternary Research in the Great Lakes Region I:<br />

The Pleistocene<br />

Fetzer Center, Kirsch Auditorium<br />

3-1 8:00 AM Lepper, Kenneth [218517]<br />

AGE CONSTRAINTS FOR AN UPDATED LAKE AGASSIZ PALEOHYDROGRAPH<br />

LEPPER, Kenneth, Department <strong>of</strong> Geosciences, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box<br />

6050, Dept. #2745, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, ken.lepper@ndsu.edu, FISHER, Timothy G.,<br />

Environmental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo, MS #604, Toledo, OH 43606, and LOWELL,<br />

Thomas V., Department <strong>of</strong> Geology, University <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati, 500 Geology/Physics Building,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221<br />

Meltwater releases from Lake Agassiz to the Mississippi, Mackenzie and Great Lakes waterways<br />

have been implicated as triggers <strong>of</strong> abrupt climate change events during the last deglacial<br />

cycle. To evaluate these assertions a paleohydrograph for Lake Agassiz is needed <strong>with</strong> robust<br />

chronologic controls. Shorelines represent static water planes and transitions between shoreline<br />

positions represent significant water-level fluctuations. However, geologic ages constraining the<br />

timing <strong>of</strong> shoreline development, and thereby water-level fluctuations for Lake Agassiz, have<br />

been difficult to obtain, and therefore, sparse. In recent years we have had success in applying<br />

OSL dating techniques to shoreline deposits <strong>of</strong> Lake Agassiz that are more easily mapped<br />

using LiDAR data. This report will summarize a growing chronologic data set that includes 35<br />

independent OSL ages from five different study areas around the southern basin, but thus far<br />

mostly focused around the southern outlet. The cumulative OSL data set for Lake Agassiz’s<br />

southern basin provides robust age constraints for the Herman, Norcross and Campbell<br />

strandlines <strong>with</strong> averages and standard deviations <strong>of</strong> 14.1 ± 0.3 ka, 13.6 ± 0.2 ka, and 10.5 ±<br />

0.3 ka, respectively. In addition, the new age constraints are used to develop an updated<br />

paleohydrograph for Lake Agassiz spanning the time period <strong>of</strong> approximately 14.5 to 10 ka<br />

which includes rapid climate changes at the end <strong>of</strong> the last ice age.<br />

3-2 8:20 AM Fisher, Timothy G. [218507]<br />

RECENT STRATIGRAPHIC AND CHRONOLOGIC RESULTS FROM THE HURON-ERIE LAKE<br />

PLAIN OF ANCESTRAL LAKE ERIE, OHIO<br />

FISHER, Timothy G. 1 , BLOCKLAND, Joseph2 , HIGLEY, Melinda3 , ANDERSON, Brad1 ,<br />

GOBLE, Ronald J. 4 , and LEPPER, Kenneth5 , (1) Environmental Sciences, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Toledo, MS #604, Toledo, OH 43606, timothy.fisher@utoledo.edu, (2) Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Environmental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo, 2801 West Bancr<strong>of</strong>t Street MS604, Toledo,<br />

OH 43606, (3) Illinois State <strong>Geological</strong> Survey, Champaign, IL 61820, (4) Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska - Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln,<br />

NE 68588, (5) Department <strong>of</strong> Geosciences, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box 6050,<br />

Dept. #2745, Fargo, ND 58108-6050<br />

An understanding <strong>of</strong> deglacial events in the Huron-Erie Lake Plain is known in general, but<br />

poorly understood in detail. During east–northeast recession <strong>of</strong> the Erie and Huron lobes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Laurentide Ice Sheet, Ancestral Lake Erie evolved through fluctuating lake levels and<br />

changing outlets. Strandlines are well known, having been mapped ~100 years ago, but detailed<br />

stratigraphic and sedimentologic analyses and age control is left wanting. To increase our<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> this lake, and in the process develop a more four-dimensional understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surficial geology, we have been dating strandlines and sand dunes using mostly OSL techniques.<br />

To evaluate the Ypsilanti low event, rhythmic lake sediments were analyzed at elevations that<br />

would have experienced subaerial emergence during this low event. Most <strong>of</strong> the sand dunes are<br />

4000–9000 years younger than the oldest strandlines. Because sand was sourced from older<br />

ice marginal and strandline deposits, dunes either initially formed or were remobilized under<br />

a deteriorating climate during stadials, and post-date disappearance <strong>of</strong> Ancestral Lake Erie.<br />

Only 507 rhythmites were observed between till and the overlying dune sand and shallow water<br />

sediment, which is fewer than expected. A stratigraphic break <strong>with</strong>in the lacustrine sedimentary<br />

sequence necessary to support the low-water Ypsilanti Phase was not observed. In summary, our<br />

data thus far suggests that stable water levels were short lived and that the lake evolved over a<br />

shorter period <strong>of</strong> time than is commonly assumed.<br />

3-3 8:40 AM Lowell, Thomas V. [218702]<br />

DO THE ICE MARGIN CHANGES OF THE LAURENTIDE GREAT LAKE LOBES MATCH THE<br />

GREENLAND ISOTOPE RECORD?<br />

LOWELL, Thomas V., Department <strong>of</strong> Geology, University <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221,<br />

thomas.lowell@uc.edu<br />

The Greenland Ice Cores have long been held as a reference for climate change during the<br />

late Pleistocene. The isotopes from multiple cores now provide a detailed record that many<br />

paleoclimate records have been compared to. Glaciers are taken as being most responsive to<br />

temperatures during the summer ablation season. Oerlemans (2005) has show that a global<br />

network <strong>of</strong> small glaciers can provide a temperature record over the last two hundred years that<br />

matches the global temperature derived from instrumented records. It would be informative to ask<br />

if the margins <strong>of</strong> ice sheets match the reference for climate change. The lobes <strong>of</strong> the Laurentide<br />

ice sheet that occupied the Great Lakes are examined here in that context.<br />

For the last glacial maximum records show that the ice sheet was south <strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes by<br />

27.2 ka cal and continued to reach its maximum at 24.0 ka cal and started to retreat as early as<br />

21.7 ka cal <strong>with</strong> major retreat underway by 17.0 ka cal. Superposed on this general pattern were<br />

advances at 24.0, 24.0, 22.2 and 21.2 ka cal. With the exception <strong>of</strong> a warm interstadial at 27.5<br />

and 23.5 ka cal, the ice core is nearly linear during this time. In other words examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ice core alone would not suggest the growth, decay pattern, nor major advances <strong>of</strong> the ice sheet<br />

margin.<br />

Possible explanations for this disconnect are 1) the ice core record does not represent the<br />

climate <strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes region; 2) the concept <strong>of</strong> seasonality, whereby the ice core records<br />

mean annual, not summer temperatures; 3) the dynamics <strong>of</strong> ice sheets are not driven by climate<br />

changes. Given that the above record was derived from and is consistent <strong>with</strong> both the Lake<br />

2013 GSA North-Central Section Meeting 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!