Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America
Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America
Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
structures, isolated sink-fills, and faults record the presence <strong>of</strong> stratigraphic units that are missing<br />
regionally. Upper Ordovician to middle Silurian clasts are incorporated into the Decaturville<br />
breccia (pre-Devonian impact) in lower Ordovician country rock. Middle Devonian marine<br />
sandstone filled a sink in lower Ordovician dolomite near Rolla. Upper Devonian Chattanooga<br />
Shale blanketed the eroded western Ozark platform. Most <strong>of</strong> this unit was removed below the<br />
sub-Mississippian unconformity in the central Ozarks but was preserved in an embayment that<br />
we informally refer to as the Northwest Arkansas Basin. Clasts <strong>of</strong> Chattanooga Shale have been<br />
recovered from the Weaubleau breccia (mid-Mississippian impact), a thin interval is preserved<br />
along the Highlandville Fault, along the lower Buffalo River, and in sink-fills in northern Arkansas.<br />
During the Early Mississippian, continued flexure resulted in back-stepping <strong>of</strong> the shelf margin,<br />
so deep-water facies accumulated on erosional remnants or peritidal lower Paleozoic strata. Major<br />
faults in southern Missouri are associated <strong>with</strong> some anomalous units <strong>of</strong> sandstone, limestone, or<br />
olistoliths, providing a record <strong>of</strong> syn-tectonic sedimentation.<br />
2-3 8:40 AM Pennington, Wayne D. [218074]<br />
THE MENOMINEE CRACK AND CLINTONVILLE BOOMS: SEISMIC EVENTS IN MICHIGAN’S<br />
UPPER PENINSULA AND NORTHEASTERN WISCONSIN<br />
PENNINGTON, Wayne D., <strong>Geological</strong> and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan<br />
Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931, wayne@mtu.edu<br />
and WAITE, Gregory P., <strong>Geological</strong> and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan<br />
Technological Univ, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> its reputation as an aseismic area, there were intriguing occurrences <strong>of</strong> seismic events<br />
in Upper Michigan and northern Wisconsin in 2010 and 2012. Although these two occurrences<br />
were only about 100 km apart, there is no evidence indicating that they are related or even due to<br />
a similar mechanism.<br />
The Menominee Crack: On October 4, 2010, a loud noise and shaking were observed in an<br />
area north <strong>of</strong> Menominee. This was associated <strong>with</strong> the appearance <strong>of</strong> 110m long crack at the<br />
crest <strong>of</strong> a ridge, 1.5m in height and up to 9m wide. The crack is apparently a surficial feature,<br />
resulting from stretching <strong>of</strong> the uppermost soil and clay layers to accommodate the creation <strong>of</strong><br />
a ridge at some shallow depth. A reasonable model (first proposed by Dr. Norm Sleep) is that<br />
the limestone underneath the clay experienced a “pop-up” due to high lateral stresses. Usually,<br />
pop-ups occur as a result <strong>of</strong> recent unloading, as at the base <strong>of</strong> a quarry or immediately following<br />
glacial retreat; neither <strong>of</strong> these describes this site, so the cause remains speculative.<br />
Clintonville Booms: Residents <strong>of</strong> Clintonville began hearing infrequent deep, rumbling sounds<br />
on March 18, 2012; the booms were sometimes accompanied by felt shaking. Following a<br />
relatively large event on March 20 that was clearly a M1.5 earthquake, four seismometers and<br />
eight sound sensors were deployed <strong>with</strong>in and around Clintonville to improve the locations <strong>of</strong><br />
subsequent events. Two events were located beneath the southeastern part <strong>of</strong> Clintonville at less<br />
than 1 km below the surface <strong>with</strong>in the granitic basement. These events were close enough to<br />
the surface so that seismic energy <strong>of</strong> sufficiently high frequency coupled to the atmosphere and<br />
propagated as sound. The Clintonville booms were indeed due to earthquakes, most <strong>of</strong> which<br />
were too small to record.<br />
2-4 9:00 AM Tupper, M. Tobias [218762]<br />
IDENTIFICATION OF LOW-LEVEL SEISMICITY IN OHIO<br />
TUPPER, M. Tobias, <strong>Geological</strong> Sciences, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Laboratories,<br />
Athens, OH 45701, mt833511@ohio.edu and GREEN, Douglas H., Dept. <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geological</strong><br />
Sciences, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger, Athens, OH 45701<br />
OhioSeis records are examined to identify previously undocumented low-level earthquakes in<br />
Ohio and surrounding regions. Records are scanned at multiple stations (at least four) to identify<br />
peak amplitude arrivals <strong>with</strong>in a time window specified by the lowest likely arrival phase velocity<br />
and the maximum inter-station distance. A potential arrival peak must have an amplitude <strong>of</strong><br />
at least 1.5 times the RMS amplitude over an entire hour containing that peak. The location<br />
(epicenter) <strong>of</strong> the potential earthquake is obtained using a velocity-independent-arrival-orderlocation<br />
(AOL) technique. The event is classified as a probable earthquake if it is similarly<br />
identified and located using a different set <strong>of</strong> four stations.<br />
Five probable earthquakes in 2011 were each identified using at least five combinations <strong>of</strong><br />
stations <strong>of</strong> four seismic stations. This includes the documented 2011 New Year’s Eve M4.0 event<br />
in Youngstown OH, which was located by this technique <strong>with</strong>in 14 km and 10 seconds <strong>of</strong> the<br />
epicenter and origin time reported by the USGS. An additional three events were identified using<br />
at least three sets <strong>of</strong> four stations, and thirteen possible 2011 earthquakes were identified using<br />
two sets <strong>of</strong> four stations. Most <strong>of</strong> these locations extend from Lake Erie up the Cuyahoga Valley,<br />
through east-central Ohio towards Marietta OH.<br />
2-5 9:20 AM Malcuit, Robert J. [217936]<br />
A JUPITER ORBIT -- LUNAR ORBIT RESONANCE MODEL: POSSIBLE CAUSE FOR THE<br />
BEGINNING OF THE MODERN STYLE OF PLATE TECTONICS<br />
MALCUIT, Robert J., Geosciences Department, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023,<br />
malcuit@denison.edu<br />
Since the Plate Tectonics Revolution in the earth sciences, there has been this lingering debate<br />
about when plate tectonics began. There are two end-member schools <strong>of</strong> thought: (1) that plate<br />
tectonics has been operating throughout geologic time (Shervais, 2006, GSA SP-405, p. 173)<br />
and (2) that plate tectonics, as we understand it today, can only occur when the Earth has cooled<br />
sufficiently to permit plates to attain negative buoyancy (Davies, 1992, Geology, 20, p. 963; Stern,<br />
2005, Geology, 33, p. 556). Stern (2005) proposes that the modern style <strong>of</strong> plate tectonics began<br />
~1.0 Ga ago.<br />
The Late Proterozoic also appears to be a critical time in the history <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit. Peale<br />
and Cassen (1978, Icarus, 36, p. 245) identified an orbital resonance state between Jupiter’s<br />
orbit and the lunar orbit when the lunar orbital radius is at 53.4 ER (earth radii). Orbital traceback<br />
calculations suggest that the earth-moon distance would be ~53.4 ER in Late Proterozoic time.<br />
The key element in such an orbital resonance is the perigean cycle <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit (the<br />
prograde progression <strong>of</strong> the perigee position <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit). At present the perigean cycle is<br />
8.85 years (60.3 ER). At 53.4 ER the perigean cycle would be ~12 years, the approximate period<br />
<strong>of</strong> Jupiter’s orbit. Under these conditions the major axis <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit would be increased to<br />
the resonant value by a forced ECC (eccentricity) but the orbital angular momentum would remain<br />
near that <strong>of</strong> a 50 ER orbit and then slowly increase in time to that <strong>of</strong> a 53.4 ER orbit. As the lunar<br />
orbital ECC reaches a maximum <strong>of</strong> up to ~0.3, the rock and ocean tidal amplitudes would be<br />
~2.5 times higher than that <strong>of</strong> a circular orbit <strong>of</strong> 53.4 ER. Such rock tidal activity could lead to the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> tidal vorticity induction cells in the upper mantle (Bostrom, 2000, Oxford Univ.<br />
Press) that would aid in the initiation <strong>of</strong> subduction.<br />
This model can be tested via the tidal rhythmite record <strong>of</strong> the Late Proterozoic. The two<br />
predictable constants are that the semi-major axis <strong>of</strong> the lunar orbit should be near 53.4 ER<br />
and the number <strong>of</strong> sidereal months per year should be about 16 throughout this era. Assuming<br />
that the earth rotation rate at 1.1 Ga (before the forced ECC episode) is ~16.9 hr/d, the number<br />
SESSION NO. 3<br />
<strong>of</strong> days per year would change from ~519 d/yr at ~1.1 Ga to 466 d/yr at the end <strong>of</strong> this orbital<br />
resonance era.<br />
SESSION NO. 3, 8:00 AM<br />
Thursday, 2 May 2013<br />
T4. Quaternary Research in the Great Lakes Region I:<br />
The Pleistocene<br />
Fetzer Center, Kirsch Auditorium<br />
3-1 8:00 AM Lepper, Kenneth [218517]<br />
AGE CONSTRAINTS FOR AN UPDATED LAKE AGASSIZ PALEOHYDROGRAPH<br />
LEPPER, Kenneth, Department <strong>of</strong> Geosciences, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box<br />
6050, Dept. #2745, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, ken.lepper@ndsu.edu, FISHER, Timothy G.,<br />
Environmental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo, MS #604, Toledo, OH 43606, and LOWELL,<br />
Thomas V., Department <strong>of</strong> Geology, University <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati, 500 Geology/Physics Building,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221<br />
Meltwater releases from Lake Agassiz to the Mississippi, Mackenzie and Great Lakes waterways<br />
have been implicated as triggers <strong>of</strong> abrupt climate change events during the last deglacial<br />
cycle. To evaluate these assertions a paleohydrograph for Lake Agassiz is needed <strong>with</strong> robust<br />
chronologic controls. Shorelines represent static water planes and transitions between shoreline<br />
positions represent significant water-level fluctuations. However, geologic ages constraining the<br />
timing <strong>of</strong> shoreline development, and thereby water-level fluctuations for Lake Agassiz, have<br />
been difficult to obtain, and therefore, sparse. In recent years we have had success in applying<br />
OSL dating techniques to shoreline deposits <strong>of</strong> Lake Agassiz that are more easily mapped<br />
using LiDAR data. This report will summarize a growing chronologic data set that includes 35<br />
independent OSL ages from five different study areas around the southern basin, but thus far<br />
mostly focused around the southern outlet. The cumulative OSL data set for Lake Agassiz’s<br />
southern basin provides robust age constraints for the Herman, Norcross and Campbell<br />
strandlines <strong>with</strong> averages and standard deviations <strong>of</strong> 14.1 ± 0.3 ka, 13.6 ± 0.2 ka, and 10.5 ±<br />
0.3 ka, respectively. In addition, the new age constraints are used to develop an updated<br />
paleohydrograph for Lake Agassiz spanning the time period <strong>of</strong> approximately 14.5 to 10 ka<br />
which includes rapid climate changes at the end <strong>of</strong> the last ice age.<br />
3-2 8:20 AM Fisher, Timothy G. [218507]<br />
RECENT STRATIGRAPHIC AND CHRONOLOGIC RESULTS FROM THE HURON-ERIE LAKE<br />
PLAIN OF ANCESTRAL LAKE ERIE, OHIO<br />
FISHER, Timothy G. 1 , BLOCKLAND, Joseph2 , HIGLEY, Melinda3 , ANDERSON, Brad1 ,<br />
GOBLE, Ronald J. 4 , and LEPPER, Kenneth5 , (1) Environmental Sciences, University<br />
<strong>of</strong> Toledo, MS #604, Toledo, OH 43606, timothy.fisher@utoledo.edu, (2) Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Environmental Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Toledo, 2801 West Bancr<strong>of</strong>t Street MS604, Toledo,<br />
OH 43606, (3) Illinois State <strong>Geological</strong> Survey, Champaign, IL 61820, (4) Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska - Lincoln, 214 Bessey Hall, Lincoln,<br />
NE 68588, (5) Department <strong>of</strong> Geosciences, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box 6050,<br />
Dept. #2745, Fargo, ND 58108-6050<br />
An understanding <strong>of</strong> deglacial events in the Huron-Erie Lake Plain is known in general, but<br />
poorly understood in detail. During east–northeast recession <strong>of</strong> the Erie and Huron lobes<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Laurentide Ice Sheet, Ancestral Lake Erie evolved through fluctuating lake levels and<br />
changing outlets. Strandlines are well known, having been mapped ~100 years ago, but detailed<br />
stratigraphic and sedimentologic analyses and age control is left wanting. To increase our<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> this lake, and in the process develop a more four-dimensional understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />
surficial geology, we have been dating strandlines and sand dunes using mostly OSL techniques.<br />
To evaluate the Ypsilanti low event, rhythmic lake sediments were analyzed at elevations that<br />
would have experienced subaerial emergence during this low event. Most <strong>of</strong> the sand dunes are<br />
4000–9000 years younger than the oldest strandlines. Because sand was sourced from older<br />
ice marginal and strandline deposits, dunes either initially formed or were remobilized under<br />
a deteriorating climate during stadials, and post-date disappearance <strong>of</strong> Ancestral Lake Erie.<br />
Only 507 rhythmites were observed between till and the overlying dune sand and shallow water<br />
sediment, which is fewer than expected. A stratigraphic break <strong>with</strong>in the lacustrine sedimentary<br />
sequence necessary to support the low-water Ypsilanti Phase was not observed. In summary, our<br />
data thus far suggests that stable water levels were short lived and that the lake evolved over a<br />
shorter period <strong>of</strong> time than is commonly assumed.<br />
3-3 8:40 AM Lowell, Thomas V. [218702]<br />
DO THE ICE MARGIN CHANGES OF THE LAURENTIDE GREAT LAKE LOBES MATCH THE<br />
GREENLAND ISOTOPE RECORD?<br />
LOWELL, Thomas V., Department <strong>of</strong> Geology, University <strong>of</strong> Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221,<br />
thomas.lowell@uc.edu<br />
The Greenland Ice Cores have long been held as a reference for climate change during the<br />
late Pleistocene. The isotopes from multiple cores now provide a detailed record that many<br />
paleoclimate records have been compared to. Glaciers are taken as being most responsive to<br />
temperatures during the summer ablation season. Oerlemans (2005) has show that a global<br />
network <strong>of</strong> small glaciers can provide a temperature record over the last two hundred years that<br />
matches the global temperature derived from instrumented records. It would be informative to ask<br />
if the margins <strong>of</strong> ice sheets match the reference for climate change. The lobes <strong>of</strong> the Laurentide<br />
ice sheet that occupied the Great Lakes are examined here in that context.<br />
For the last glacial maximum records show that the ice sheet was south <strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes by<br />
27.2 ka cal and continued to reach its maximum at 24.0 ka cal and started to retreat as early as<br />
21.7 ka cal <strong>with</strong> major retreat underway by 17.0 ka cal. Superposed on this general pattern were<br />
advances at 24.0, 24.0, 22.2 and 21.2 ka cal. With the exception <strong>of</strong> a warm interstadial at 27.5<br />
and 23.5 ka cal, the ice core is nearly linear during this time. In other words examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ice core alone would not suggest the growth, decay pattern, nor major advances <strong>of</strong> the ice sheet<br />
margin.<br />
Possible explanations for this disconnect are 1) the ice core record does not represent the<br />
climate <strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes region; 2) the concept <strong>of</strong> seasonality, whereby the ice core records<br />
mean annual, not summer temperatures; 3) the dynamics <strong>of</strong> ice sheets are not driven by climate<br />
changes. Given that the above record was derived from and is consistent <strong>with</strong> both the Lake<br />
2013 GSA North-Central Section Meeting 3