11.04.2013 Views

The Literary Mind.pdf

The Literary Mind.pdf

The Literary Mind.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 THE LITERARY MIND<br />

case or evolution or computer activity or any of a vast range of other targets. We<br />

can project it just as we project the generic spaces that arise out of "When the<br />

cat's away, the mice will play" or "Look before you leap" or any other proverb<br />

that mentions only a specific source story. We can project it not just to purposeful<br />

behavior directed at a goal but indeed to any action performed by an intentional<br />

agent. "Watch your step" can be said of any action that an agent is about<br />

to perform, purposeful or not, intentional or not, consciously or not. <strong>The</strong> generic<br />

space underlying "Watch your step" consists only of an agent, an action that the<br />

agent is on the verge of performing, and a warning to pay attention.<br />

A telling difference between a basic metaphor like LIFE IS A JOURNEY and<br />

our generic interpretation of "<strong>The</strong> girl who can't dance says the band can't play"<br />

is this: <strong>The</strong> generic space involved in LIFE IS A JOURNEY has a deeply entrenched<br />

default projection onto a particular specific target space, the course of a life from<br />

birth to death, while the generic space arising from "<strong>The</strong> girl who can't dance<br />

says the band can't play" is not conventionally tied to a specific target space. It is<br />

therefore easier to see the generic space in the second case, and to be aware of<br />

our application of that generic space to this or that specific target space.<br />

When we take our data exclusively from deeply entrenched projections like<br />

LIFE IS A JOURNEY that have deeply entrenched vocabulary, the generic and<br />

blended spaces are less easily noticed, and the projection looks as if it carries<br />

positive meaning from one input space (the source) to another (the target). This<br />

has lead to the customary model of the projection of meaning as direct, one-way,<br />

and positive. This is a useful and parsimonious model, but it is adequate only in<br />

limiting cases.<br />

Generic spaces differ linguistically from specific input spaces and blended<br />

spaces in one fundamental regard: <strong>The</strong>y lack their own rich vocabulary. <strong>The</strong><br />

vocabulary of a generic space is largely shifted to it from an input space. This<br />

vocabulary applies whenever we project the generic space onto a new space. For<br />

example, we have no generic word that means "an instrument somebody uses so<br />

constantly in his chosen work as to be regarded as defining the work." One such<br />

instrument for one such worker is an axe. <strong>The</strong> relation of the worker to the axe—<br />

manipulating it, trying to get it to do what he wants done—has an abstract structure,<br />

and this structure can be projected to a generic space. That generic space<br />

can then be projected to a target, such as playing a jazz instrument. In jazz,<br />

someone's instrument is called his axe. A saxophone is an axe, but so is a flute, a<br />

guitar, a drum set, a piano. <strong>The</strong> vocabulary of one space is shifted to the generic<br />

space, and projected from there to whatever target the generic applies to—in this<br />

case, jazz instruments. A new projection of the generic space onto a new kind of<br />

instrument (a synthesizer, for example) will not look unusual even if it is entirely<br />

novel: the vocabulary that has been shifted to the generic space is expected to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!