11.04.2013 Views

The Literary Mind.pdf

The Literary Mind.pdf

The Literary Mind.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

146 THE LITERARY MIND<br />

so long as what we are looking at seems like background: a tree and a lawn on a<br />

quiet day. But if a lightning bolt strikes the tree, it looks very different, and<br />

becomes reportable. We believe that the same laws of physics and biology hold<br />

for both scenes and that in a scientific sense a great deal is going on in both scenes.<br />

Yet the lightning strike looks like a little story and the other scene looks like<br />

background, nothing remarkable.<br />

This distinction of story as opposed to no story projects to the distinction of<br />

speech as opposed to no speech. Silence is part of grammar and is the counterpart<br />

of no story. We grant to certain elements of our perceptual experience special<br />

distinguished status. We think of things as happening against a background.<br />

Analogously, we think of speech as happening against a background of silence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> silence reports the background; the speech reports whatever is distinguished<br />

against the background. This is not always the case, of course: modern languages<br />

have developed many highly intricate instruments that go far beyond the basic<br />

grammatical constructions for basic stories. But radically, we report that the lightning<br />

struck the tree or that one person hugged another or that the rains flooded<br />

the tunnel or that the branch waved back and forth in the heavy wind. Reporting<br />

a nonevent is less common, unless the event was expected, in which case the<br />

nonevent is itself conceived of as an event. <strong>The</strong> form of reporting nonevents—<br />

"<strong>The</strong> lightning did not strike the tree"—is also much less prototypical. It would<br />

be odd to make this report if the event had not been expected; the negation pays<br />

homage to the story that did not happen rather than the nonevent that did.<br />

Narrative imagining partitions and categorizes wholes into related elements,<br />

as when the small spatial story of Mary throwing a stone is perceived and categorized<br />

as involving different elements in different categories that stand in narrative<br />

relationships. Narrative partitioning, categorizing, and relating project to<br />

create grammatical partitioning, categorizing, and relating. <strong>The</strong> result is grammatical<br />

categories and grammatical relations.<br />

Story groups elements. For example, the image schema path-to-goa/ groups<br />

the elements in the motion of the stone toward the window into a single unit.<br />

Story grouping projects to create grammatical grouping: "Toward the window"<br />

is a grammatical group. In English, this grammatical grouping is not simply a<br />

matter of sound adjacency. "Mary threw the rock toward the—if I'm not mistaken<br />

—window" still has "toward the window" as a grammatical group. Nonadjacency<br />

in grammatical grouping is even more evident in a language like Latin.<br />

Narrative imagining combines finite elements into infinitely many products—Mary,<br />

John, throws, catches, pushes, flips, stone, ball, and coin, as conceptual<br />

elements of narrative imagining, combine into a great number of particular<br />

stories: Mary throws the stone, John throws the stone, Mary throws the ball,<br />

John catches the ball, John flips the coin, Mary pushes the coin, and so on. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!