Oct - Dec 2009 • Vol. No. 32 Issue No. 2 • - L&T Construction
Oct - Dec 2009 • Vol. No. 32 Issue No. 2 • - L&T Construction
Oct - Dec 2009 • Vol. No. 32 Issue No. 2 • - L&T Construction
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
There was a tunnel extension of 3 m available period of construction. Existence of plant water<br />
from existing TP 6 with a knockout wall to pipe line and live railway lines of the existing<br />
facilitate execution of tunnel 113 & 114. Track hopper created a major hindrance. The<br />
entire civil work of Track Hopper was carried<br />
The tunnel of conveyor 111A/B has to cross<br />
existing cable gallery. To add to the complexity of<br />
the job, 1 two legged trestle of the cable gallery is<br />
exactly located on the conveyor 111A/B<br />
out across live railway lines of existing track<br />
hopper where an average movement of 3 Coal<br />
rakes in a day was the order of the day. As there<br />
was no approach way other than crossing the<br />
Similarly the tunnel of conveyor 112A/B has to<br />
railway track, productivity had to suffer heavily<br />
cross existing fuel oil railway lines (15 m stretch)<br />
on account of idle time during rake movement/<br />
unloading<br />
In both the cases, rerouting of cable gallery or<br />
railway lines cannot be allowed.<br />
A major structural modification work of an<br />
existing TP – was planned and carried out without<br />
Other constraints<br />
taking any “shut down” or disruption of live HT, LT<br />
and Instrumentation cables passing all along.<br />
Rock strata were found in the pre-excavated<br />
Track Hopper area. About 1.5m depth of rock<br />
had to be excavated manually without “Blasting”<br />
(was not permitted in a running plant)<br />
Constraints of working space and non<br />
availability of access/ approach road at Track<br />
Hopper area – prevailed during the entire<br />
State-of-the-art stacker reclaimer<br />
L&T has successfully completed the project – as per<br />
contract / client’s requirement and now on request of<br />
the satisfied client (WBPDCL), is also providing<br />
assistance in operation and maintenance of the new<br />
CHP. (which is beyond the contractual obligation)<br />
Bakreswar CHP project is yet another testimony of Larsen<br />
& Toubro's capability and competence in providing