25.04.2013 Views

Oct - Dec 2009 • Vol. No. 32 Issue No. 2 • - L&T Construction

Oct - Dec 2009 • Vol. No. 32 Issue No. 2 • - L&T Construction

Oct - Dec 2009 • Vol. No. 32 Issue No. 2 • - L&T Construction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stock pile. The center-to-center distance of the Monolithic construction of side walls, hopper<br />

existing and proposed Track Hoppers were <strong>32</strong>m and and top frame beams<br />

was at a distance of 18m from edge of the existing<br />

coal stock yard retaining wall. It left a working space<br />

<strong>Construction</strong> from bottom to top method<br />

of mere 3 to 8 m from the edge of raft to these existing Use of crane with skip bucket<br />

structures.<br />

The top crust of the proposed Track Hopper was<br />

filled up with service road, drains, lighting mast, RCC<br />

pavement, underground service water and sewer<br />

Use of long boom excavator<br />

Sheet pile driving<br />

lines. Since there was no space for approach road, Initially the sheet piles were designed based<br />

there was congestion in the movement of man, on dry soil condition with top 5 m as open<br />

material and resources. and thereafter leaving earth (1:1 slope) for<br />

passive pressure and without any struts. But<br />

Another limiting factor was that ground water table was due to prevailing soil condition at site this was<br />

just about a meter below the FGL and the nature of soil found to be ineffective at execution stage and<br />

was mainly a complex mixture of silty clay and sandy silt finally a revised design was prepared with<br />

with 'N' value more than 100 near foundation bottom. struts.<br />

The prevailing soil condition at site was highly<br />

saturated. Disposal yard was approximately 5 km away<br />

from the site and is surrounded by frequently operated<br />

MGR line (railway track). Excavation was allowed upto 1<br />

m above the water table for safe movement of machinery,<br />

which was done through 24x7 water table monitoring by<br />

sounding technique. For this additional boreholes were<br />

made in various segments of Track Hopper area.<br />

Techniques adopted to overcome the<br />

challenges<br />

Sheet pile and strutting work<br />

Deep bore well dewatering system<br />

Mechanized deep excavation<br />

Doka Formwork with water stop tie rod<br />

arrangement<br />

Water jetting for installation of sheet piles<br />

Castellated beam for Structural Steel work of<br />

track hopper shed<br />

To lower the water level, extensive de-<br />

watering had to be done, which resulted<br />

indensification of hard strata and dry<br />

condition of soil having 'N' value more than<br />

100. A complex pile driving technique, in<br />

combination of Vibro and Impact hammer<br />

with water jetting / trenching was adopted.<br />

Extensive monitoring and carrying out of<br />

remedial measures for the deflection of struts,<br />

which continued throughout the Track Hopper<br />

construction.<br />

Despite all odds, the entire construction of<br />

Track Hopper was completed in 18 months<br />

including all the associated and finishing<br />

activities.<br />

Sabyasachi Sarkar<br />

Joint General Manager (BMH)<br />

Jaydeep Goswami<br />

Manager (BMH)<br />

37<br />

ECC Concord <strong>Oct</strong>-<strong>Dec</strong> 09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!