pdf 820Kb - INSEAD CALT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Other suggestions: Evaluation report of the use of Onto-Logging platform in the user site Deliverable ID: D8b Page : 100 of 110 Version: 1.0 Date: 27 january 2004 Status: Final Confid.: Public Which type of adaptations amongst the previous three is the most important for you? If you have other ideas suggest other types of personalization which KMSs could include: 8.9 Comments to: Liana.Razmerita@insead.edu
Evaluation report of the use of Onto-Logging platform in the user site Deliverable ID: D8b Annex 9 Ontologging project questionnaire This questionnaire is divided into 5 sections: Ontologging Project Questionnaire Page : 101 of 110 Version: 1.0 Date: 27 january 2004 Status: Final Confid.: Public A. Ontologging System –DUI, Usage Perspective ............................................................... 102 B. Ontologging System –DUI Tool Perspective................................................................... 104 C. Ontologging System – DUI Ontology Perspective .......................................................... 105 D. Detailed KM Process View............................................................................................. 106 E. Ontologging System -Future Perspective ....................................................................... 110 Glossary Knowledge capitalisation-includes processes such as submitting valuable knowledge assets in the system (e.g. writing a tender and making it available in a database or KMS or other knowledge assets which you have not necessarily written.) Adding annotations is part of the knowledge capitalisation process. Knowledge sharing- the process of knowledge sharing can be facilitated by the knowledge management tools (shared folders, collaborative tools, forum of discussions) but also by other less informal means like coffee break conversations with peers. Knowledge retrieving- is facilitated by querying/searching and browsing m echanisms included in the KM tools, but also by a good conceptualization of the domain knowledge.
Page 1 and 2:
The ONTO-LOGGING Consortium consist
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 5 and 6:
Executive Summary Evaluation report
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50: Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 53 and 54: • List of connected users to the
Page 67 and 68: 5.5.1 Description of the evaluation
Page 69 and 70: 6 Discussion and Conclusions Evalua
Page 75 and 76: 8 Annex Evaluation report of the us
Page 93 and 94: esolver consultas. C42 Existen axio
Page 99: Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 103 and 104: 1 The functionalities provided by D
show all

pdf 820Kb - INSEAD CALT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?