pdf 820Kb - INSEAD CALT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation report of the use of Onto-Logging platform in the user site Deliverable ID: D8b B. Ontologging System –DUI Tool Perspective Ontologging system DUI tool perspective 1 Functionalities provided 2 Interface design 3 Ergonomics 4 Friendliness 5 Usability 6 Help level 7 Response time 8 Effort to load data 9 Effort required to use the tool Very poor Page : 104 of 110 Version: 1.0 Date: 27 january 2004 Status: Final Confid.: Public poor adequate good Very good What have you perceived as the main strengths and weaknesses of the different tools? Knowledge capitalisation Strengths Knowle dge capitalisation Weaknesses Knowledge searching Strengths Knowledge searching Weaknesses Knowledge sharing Strengths Knowledge sharing Weaknesses
Evaluation report of the use of Onto-Logging platform in the user site Deliverable ID: D8b C. Ontologging System – DUI Ontology Perspective Page : 105 of 110 Version: 1.0 Date: 27 january 2004 Status: Final Confid.: Public Have you noticed any advantage in using an ontology approach for defining the domain knowledge? DUI an ontology perspective Strongly disagree 1 The ontology offers good support for the given scenario (tender, development, technology) 2 The ontology offers good support for the business process in general 4 The ontology is complete (concepts, instances) relations and 5 The terminology is consistent with general usage Disagree Slightly disagree Slightly agree Agree Strongly agree Have you annotated documents using DUI? From your perspective are these annotations useful?
Page 1 and 2:
The ONTO-LOGGING Consortium consist
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 5 and 6:
Executive Summary Evaluation report
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54: • List of connected users to the
Page 55 and 56: Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 67 and 68: 5.5.1 Description of the evaluation
Page 69 and 70: 6 Discussion and Conclusions Evalua
Page 75 and 76: 8 Annex Evaluation report of the us
Page 93 and 94: esolver consultas. C42 Existen axio
Page 103: 1 The functionalities provided by D
show all

pdf 820Kb - INSEAD CALT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?