pdf 820Kb - INSEAD CALT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation report of the use of Onto-Logging platform in the user site Deliverable ID: D8b Page : 82 of 110 Version: 1.0 Date: 27 january 2004 Status: Final Confid.: Public Error messages should be expressed in plain language (no codes), precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution. Help and documentation Even though it is better if the system can be used without documentation, it may be necessary to provide help and documentation. Any such information should be easy to search, focused on the user's task, list concrete steps to be carried out, and not be too large. 8.4 Annex 4: Glossary of terms Flexibility the multiplicity of ways the user and system exchange information. Learnability the ease with which new users can begin effective interaction and achieve maximal performance. Robustness the level of support provided to the user in determining successful achievement and assessment of goals. Usability a measure of the ease with which a system can be learned or used, its safety, effectiveness and efficiency, and the attitude of its user towards it. Evaluation method a procedure for collecting relevant data about the operation and usability of a computer system. Formative evaluation an evaluation that takes place before actual implementation and which influences the development of the product. Summative evaluation an evaluation that takes after implementation and has the aim of testing the proper functioning of a product.
Evaluation report of the use of Onto-Logging platform in the user site Deliverable ID: D8b Page : 83 of 110 Version: 1.0 Date: 27 january 2004 Status: Final Confid.: Public 8.5 Annex 5: Pre -questionnaire for the participants in the Ontologging usability test The following pre-questionnaire what distributed to a group of users at Indra in October 2003. Title: Pre -questionnaire for the participants in the Ontologging usability test This pre questionnaire is intended to get to know better the end-users/testers of Ontologging system and their real needs. It serves to the evaluation of Ontologging system; it is a first phase of evaluation. The evaluation of the Ontologging system might include a comparison of a classical approach (actual KM tools) with an ontology-based approach. Name (optional)………………………………… Function………………………………………… Gender………………………………………….. Years of experience……………………………… What are your main job tasks and responsibilities at INDRA? ( e.g. programming, managing, consulting, marketing, sales, etc.) Can you indicate some of your knowledge oriented activities? ( e.g. customer relationship management, work on various projects, write tenders, write reports, etc.)
Page 1 and 2:
The ONTO-LOGGING Consortium consist
Page 3 and 4:
Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 5 and 6:
Executive Summary Evaluation report
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32: Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 53 and 54: • List of connected users to the
Page 67 and 68: 5.5.1 Description of the evaluation
Page 69 and 70: 6 Discussion and Conclusions Evalua
Page 75 and 76: 8 Annex Evaluation report of the us
Page 81: Evaluation report of the use of Ont
Page 93 and 94: esolver consultas. C42 Existen axio
Page 103 and 104: 1 The functionalities provided by D
show all

pdf 820Kb - INSEAD CALT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?