Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College
Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College
Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GIBLIN-DAVIS ET AL.—CUTICULAR CHANGES IN FERGUSOBIID NEMATODES 247<br />
harenkova and Chizhov, 1991, and Allantonema<br />
rnirabile Leuckart, 1884 (Allantonematidae),<br />
were similar to those of P. nicholasi, being composed<br />
of a hypertrophied epidermis with microvilli<br />
that was covered by a cuticle-like layer<br />
(Subbotin et al., 1994).<br />
Insect hemolymph characteristically has high<br />
levels of amino acids, trehalose, other nonamino<br />
organic acids, and salts (Chapman, 1972), making<br />
it a nutrient-rich environment for parasites<br />
that can overcome innate host defense mechanisms.<br />
Insect-parasitic tylenchid nematodes have<br />
adapted to the challenges of obtaining nutrition<br />
from a living insect host in a variety of ways,<br />
including acquisition per os (through the<br />
mouth), through a modified or absent cuticle, or<br />
through prolapsis and modification of the uterus<br />
as in the Sphaerulariinae (Sphaerulariidae). Tylenchids<br />
from the Neotylenchidae, Allantonematidae,<br />
lotonchiidae, and Parasitotylenchidae<br />
have insect-parasitic forms that are obese and<br />
have degenerate esophagi, intestines that are degenerate<br />
or modifed as storage organs, and the<br />
stylet often sunken into the body or even lacking<br />
(Siddiqi, 2000), suggesting that they employ<br />
some form of transcuticular or transepidermal<br />
uptake.<br />
Deladenus (Neotylenchidae), Paraiotonchium<br />
(lotonchiidae), Howardula (Allantonematidae),<br />
Skarbilovinerna (lotonchiidae), and Fergusobia<br />
(Neotylenchidae) may represent contemporary<br />
examples of an evolutionary trend from per os<br />
to transepidermal nutrient acquisition in insectparasitic<br />
Tylenchida. Of course, this is a highly<br />
speculative exercise until more information<br />
about the transition between preparasitic and<br />
parasitic females is known and some independent<br />
phylogenetic data are available. The evolutionary<br />
trend is hypothesized to be: 1) Per os<br />
acquisition via a stylet, esophagus, and gut. This<br />
strategy takes advantage of the existing stylet for<br />
feeding on fungi, plants, or other invertebrates.<br />
It is a less energy- and time-efficient method of<br />
nutrient acquisition for a hemocoelic parasite because<br />
obtaining food through the stylet requires<br />
expending energy to maintain and operate its<br />
esophagus and intestine. 2) Per os acquisition<br />
with thinning and partial apolysis of the cuticle<br />
and coincident epidermal folding to increase surface<br />
area for supplemental transcuticular uptake<br />
of nutrients (possibly Deladenus spp.). 3) Early<br />
per os acquisition followed by apolysis, partial<br />
absorption of the cuticle without the creation of<br />
a new cuticle, and folding of the epidermis such<br />
that uptake is transcuticular and somatic muscles,<br />
esophagus, and gut degenerate (e.g., Paraiotonchium).<br />
4) Early per os acquisition followed<br />
by full apolysis and ecdysis without the<br />
creation of a new cuticle. There is hypertrophy<br />
and folding of the epidermis, and nutrient uptake<br />
is transepidermal, somatic muscles and esophagus<br />
degenerate, and the gut degenerates or is<br />
transformed into a storage organ (e.g., Howardula,<br />
Skarbilovinema, and Fergusobia). The epidermal<br />
hypertrophy and folding are superficially<br />
similar to the formation of plicae (epidermal<br />
folds) during the development of a new cuticle<br />
(Bird and Bird, 1991) but are more extensive<br />
and apparently are not accompanied by the formation<br />
of a new cuticle.<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We thank Drs. Bill Howard and Thomas<br />
Weissling for review of the manuscript and Matthew<br />
Purcell, Jeff Makinson, and Dr. John<br />
Goolsby for making the senior author's visit to<br />
the Australian Biological Control laboratory in<br />
Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia, such a<br />
productive and enjoyable experience. This project<br />
was funded in part by USDA-ARS Specific<br />
Cooperative Agreement No. 58-6629-9-004<br />
from the USDA Invasive Plant Research Laboratory<br />
in Davie, Florida, U.S.A. This is Florida<br />
Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series<br />
No. R-07870.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Bird, A. F., and J. Bird. 1991. The Structure of Nematodes,<br />
2nd ed. Academic Press, Inc., New York,<br />
U.S.A. 316 pp.<br />
Chapman, R. F. 1972. The Insects: Structure and<br />
Function. American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc.,<br />
New York, U.S.A. 819 pp.<br />
Currie, G. A. 1937. Galls on Eucalyptus trees: A new<br />
type of association between flies and nematodes.<br />
Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South<br />
Wales 62:147-174.<br />
Giblin-Davis, R. M., K. A. Davies, G. S. Taylor, and<br />
W. K. Thomas. <strong>2001</strong>. Entomophilic nematode<br />
models for studying biodiversity and cospeciation.<br />
Pages 00-00 in Z. X. Chen, S. Y. Chen, and D.<br />
W. Dickson, eds. Nematology, Advances and Perspectives.<br />
Tsinghua University Press/Springer-<br />
Verlag, New York, U.S.A. (In press.)<br />
Maggenti, A. R. 1982. General Nematology. Springer-<br />
Verlag, New York. 372 pp.<br />
Nicholas, W. L. 1972. The fine structure of the cuticle<br />
of Heterotylenchus. Nematologica 18:138-140.<br />
Poinar, G. O., Jr. 1979. Nematodes for Biological<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington