Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College
Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College
Comparative Parasitology 68(2) 2001 - Peru State College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
222 COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY, <strong>68</strong>(2), JULY <strong>2001</strong><br />
ETYMOLOGY: This species is named for its<br />
type locality, Vietnam.<br />
Remarks<br />
Singhiatrema vietnamensis is consistent with<br />
members of Ommatobrephidae because it has a<br />
preacetabular cirrus sac with an internal seminal<br />
vesicle; large embryonated eggs, with some containing<br />
an oculate miracidium; and opposite incompletely<br />
lobed testes located in the posterior<br />
region of the body, often with axes diverging<br />
anteriorly. The species belongs in Ommatobrephinae<br />
rather than Parorchiinae Lai, 1936, because<br />
the collar of spines is interrupted dorsally<br />
and ventrally as opposed to being arranged in a<br />
continuous row. In addition, the tegument is<br />
smooth rather than spinous, an external seminal<br />
vesicle is absent, spines do not occur on the intromittent<br />
organ, and the specimens are parasites<br />
in reptiles rather than birds. The 2 genera within<br />
Ommatobrephinae, Singhiatrema and Ommatobrephus<br />
Nicoll, 1914, are distinguished by the<br />
presence of a dorsally interrupted row of collar<br />
spines in the former and the absence of the collar<br />
spines in the latter. The presence of a dorsally<br />
and ventrally interrupted row of 22-23 collar<br />
spines in 5. vietnamensis enables us to assign<br />
the worms to the genus Singhiatrema. Singhiatrema<br />
was originally unveiled to science in an<br />
oral presentation and abstract at the Forty-first<br />
Session of the Indian Science Congress (Simha,<br />
1954). The genus was described in more detail<br />
by Simha (1958) and placed in Echinostomatidae<br />
Poche, 1926, by the author without a subfamily<br />
designation. Singhiatrema singhia Simha,<br />
1954, from a colubrid ratsnake (Ptyas mucosus<br />
(Linnaeus, 1758)) from Hyderabad in southern<br />
India, was designated the type species (Simha,<br />
1954). Two other species, Singhiatrema longifurca<br />
Simha, 1958, and Singhiatrema hyderabadensis<br />
Simha, 1958, parasitize another colubrid<br />
water snake, the checkered keelback Xenochrophis<br />
piscator (Schneider, 1799) (as Tropidonotus<br />
piscator}, from the same locality<br />
(Simha, 1958). Three other Indian species have<br />
since been added to the genus. Singhiatrema najai<br />
parasitizes the Indian cobra (N. najd) in Hyderabad,<br />
S. lali parasitizes the turtle H. thurgii<br />
in Lucknow, and Singhiatrema piscatora Dwivedi,<br />
19<strong>68</strong>, parasitizes the water snake X. piscator<br />
in Chhindwara (Chakrabarti, 1967; Chattopadhyaya,<br />
1967; Dwivedi, 19<strong>68</strong>).<br />
Singhiatrema vietnamensis differs from its<br />
Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington<br />
congeners, with the exception of S. lali, by having<br />
ceca that extend to the posterior region of<br />
the body and vitelline follicles that lie ventral<br />
and lateral to the ceca in bands stretching from<br />
the posterior margin of the acetabulum to the<br />
midlevel of the testes. Singhiatrema vietnamensis<br />
differs from S. lali by having larger eggs<br />
(103-119 |xm long by 45-56 jxm wide vs. 65-<br />
87 |xm long by 34-39 |xm wide), ceca that reach<br />
beyond the posterior level of the testes rather<br />
than to their midlevel, longer collar spines (31-<br />
56 (Jim rather than 7-9 jxm), and a snake rather<br />
than a turtle definitive host. Yamaguti (1971) reported<br />
24 collar spines for S. lali; however,<br />
Chakrabarti (1967) did not report the number of<br />
collar spines in the description of S. lali, and the<br />
illustration of the species did not permit the collar<br />
spines to be counted. Specimens of S. lali<br />
were apparently never deposited in a lending<br />
museum. We report 22-23 collar spines in our<br />
specimens of 5. vietnamensis. Three of 5 of our<br />
specimens had 22 collar spines and the remaining<br />
2 had 23 collar spines. It is possible that<br />
some specimens could lose spines in life or handling,<br />
but biological variation probably exists.<br />
Initially, we obtained 4 specimens of S. vietnamensis<br />
that had been placed in fresh water<br />
prior to their fixation with slight pressure in unheated<br />
formalin (see Fig. 2). The overall shape<br />
of these specimens, as well as their measurements,<br />
varied dramatically from those specimens<br />
fixed with heat and used in the above description.<br />
Specimens subjected to fresh water and<br />
pressure had an oval rather than pyriform body<br />
shape, and their width was greater (1.0-1.6 mm<br />
vs. 0.75-0.91 mm). The pharynx was swollen<br />
(131-158 |xm long by 127-140 jxm wide vs. 95-<br />
106 (Jim long by 78-106 |xm wide), and the<br />
esophagus was contracted in length but swollen<br />
in width (285-415 (xm long by 77-203 |xm wide<br />
vs. 547-640 (xm long by 80-105 |xm wide). In<br />
addition, the ceca were contracted slightly,<br />
reaching to the posterior level of the testes rather<br />
than beyond the posterior level of the testes, and<br />
the eggs were swollen or collapsed and therefore<br />
larger in whole mounts (109—117 |xm long by<br />
81-95 urn wide vs. 103-119 |xm long by 45-56<br />
(xm wide). The long side of the oval cirrus sac<br />
was oriented laterally rather than vertically, with<br />
the pore on the sinistral end rather than at the<br />
anterior end, and the testes were larger (411-560<br />
|xm long by 258-339 |xm wide compared with<br />
250-340 |xm long by 195-234 |xm wide). If the