Annual Report 2008 - Securitas
Annual Report 2008 - Securitas
Annual Report 2008 - Securitas
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
54<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> report<br />
report of the Board of Directors<br />
Acquisitions after December 31, <strong>2008</strong><br />
Akal Security, Hawaii<br />
<strong>Securitas</strong> has acquired the Hawaiian commercial business contracts<br />
and assets of the security services company Akal Security. The<br />
acquisition of these contracts and the addition of over 300 security<br />
officers will strengthen <strong>Securitas</strong>‘ position as the market leader in<br />
security services in the State of Hawaii. with this acquisition, <strong>Securitas</strong><br />
will employ over 2,700 employees in Hawaii. The acquisition<br />
will be consolidated within <strong>Securitas</strong> as of February 20, 2009.<br />
Moore Security, USA<br />
<strong>Securitas</strong> has acquired the commercial contracts and operational<br />
assets of the security services company Moore Security. Sales in<br />
the acquired contracts are approximately MSEK 140 (MUSD 15.6).<br />
Moore Security, with approximately 650 employees, has a very<br />
balanced and diverse customer portfolio in terms of sizes and vertical<br />
markets in Indiana and Kentucky. The acquisition will strengthen<br />
<strong>Securitas</strong>’ position as the market leader in this area. The acquisition<br />
will be consolidated within <strong>Securitas</strong> as of March 13, 2009.<br />
Other significant events<br />
Brazil – Estrela Azul<br />
In connection with the efforts of <strong>Securitas</strong> to expand its activities<br />
in Latin America, <strong>Securitas</strong> entered into an agreement in 2005<br />
with respect to the possible acquisition of a security guarding<br />
company in Brazil. In order to support this company while required<br />
governmental approvals were obtained, <strong>Securitas</strong> provided a bank<br />
guarantee for the benefit of the subject company. The governmental<br />
approvals took much longer than anticipated to obtain and<br />
during such period the financial condition of the target company<br />
substantially deteriorated. Given the decline in the financial condition<br />
of the company, in December 2006 <strong>Securitas</strong> exercised its<br />
right not to complete the acquisition following the receipt of the<br />
government approval. In view of the decision not to complete the<br />
subject transaction, a provision in the amount of the bank guarantee<br />
was recognized as of December 31, 2006.<br />
The company has since filed for protection from its creditors<br />
under Brazilian legislation providing for a judicial restructuring<br />
process. <strong>Securitas</strong>, being a creditor in the insolvency matter, has<br />
objected to the company’s restructuring plan proposed in the<br />
judicial restructuring process. The insolvency judge decided against<br />
<strong>Securitas</strong> and this decision was appealed by <strong>Securitas</strong> in <strong>2008</strong>.<br />
The court of Appeal has in its decision upheld the lower courts’<br />
decision. This decision is now subject to a “special appeal”.<br />
In connection with the commencement of this judicial restructuring<br />
process, the company has asserted a claim of MUSD 140<br />
against <strong>Securitas</strong>, alleging that <strong>Securitas</strong> is responsible for the<br />
company’s failure. <strong>Securitas</strong> denies all responsibility for such claim.<br />
The defense of these cases has been entrusted to one of the leading<br />
law firms in Brazil.<br />
In addition, a number of employees of Estrela Azul who claim<br />
to be owed wages have named <strong>Securitas</strong> in addition to other<br />
parties in pending labor suits. The number of labor law cases<br />
involving <strong>Securitas</strong> increased in <strong>2008</strong>. The claimed amounts<br />
<strong>Securitas</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> report <strong>2008</strong><br />
are normally low. The defense of these labour cases has been<br />
entrusted to one of the leading law firms in Brazil. <strong>Securitas</strong><br />
denies all responsibility for such claims.<br />
Germany – Heros<br />
The German cash handling operations were divested in November<br />
2005 to the German Heros Group. In February 2006, the Heros<br />
Group of companies filed for insolvency under German law. In<br />
connection with the foregoing, the Insolvency Trustee has been<br />
examining all relevant prior transactions of the insolvent companies,<br />
including the German cash handling companies, which<br />
<strong>Securitas</strong> sold to the Heros Group. Following his investigation,<br />
the Trustee has raised questions relating to pre-acquisition transactions<br />
in the divested companies, alleging possible material<br />
future claims.<br />
On April 7, <strong>2008</strong> the Insolvency Trustee advised <strong>Securitas</strong> in<br />
a letter that according to the Trustee, the Heros companies (in<br />
bankruptcy) may have substantial monetary claims on <strong>Securitas</strong><br />
Germany and that in the absence of a mutual understanding and<br />
agreement on the questioned transactions, Heros will commence<br />
legal action against <strong>Securitas</strong> Germany.<br />
The claims of the Heros companies (in bankruptcy) are based<br />
on the Trustees current understanding of the subject transactions,<br />
resulting in the allegation that certain inter-company transactions<br />
(set-offs) performed by <strong>Securitas</strong> Germany prior to the sale of the<br />
companies were not in compliance with German law. Heros’ aggregated<br />
claims on <strong>Securitas</strong> Germany amounts to approximately<br />
MEUr 108. Heros is in addition requesting <strong>Securitas</strong> Germany to<br />
re-assign a claim against the insurance company IF which was kept<br />
by <strong>Securitas</strong> in the divestiture. Based on local legal expertise and<br />
a legal opinion from a renown law professor, <strong>Securitas</strong> will object<br />
to the claims raised by the Trustee.<br />
As of December 31, 2006 a minor provision was recognised<br />
to cover the known exposure in the Heros claim at that time. This<br />
provision remains unchanged. No additional provision has been<br />
established for the recent claim.<br />
Germany – Welo<br />
During 2001 <strong>Securitas</strong> in Germany in response to customer<br />
requests took on cash booking responsibilities in addition to the<br />
cash in transit activities which it had historically provided in Germany.<br />
In connection with the performance of these activities, during the<br />
time of the euro introduction in Germany, a loss developed with a<br />
major customer. The amount of the loss was advanced by <strong>Securitas</strong><br />
Germany to the customer in accordance with the relevant contract<br />
in two payments and the equivalent has been claimed against the<br />
relevant insurance policies.<br />
On April 8, <strong>2008</strong> the court in Düsseldorf rendered its judgment<br />
in the case. The court decided against <strong>Securitas</strong>. The claim under<br />
the insurance policy was fully provided for as per June 30, 2006.<br />
<strong>Securitas</strong> has decided not to appeal the Düsseldorf court decision<br />
of April 8, <strong>2008</strong>.