28.05.2013 Views

Annual Report 2008 - Securitas

Annual Report 2008 - Securitas

Annual Report 2008 - Securitas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Germany – U.S. Army<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong> Germany has filed a law suit against the U.S. Army for<br />

unpaid services under a now expired contract for guarding services.<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong>’ claim is approximately MEUr 4.4. The U.S. Army has<br />

filed a counterclaim of MEUR 10.5 plus penalties (requesting also<br />

treble damages under U.S. law) alleging over-billings of 550,000<br />

hours by <strong>Securitas</strong>. An independent auditing firm has been<br />

engaged to assist in the investigation of the claim.<br />

Based on <strong>Securitas</strong>’ U.S. counsel’s current evaluation of<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong>’ claim and the conclusions of the auditing firm, Group<br />

Management view a settlement solution as a possible option for<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong>. Settlement discussions are therefore agreed with the<br />

U.S. Army to continue during 2009.<br />

United Kingdom – Loomis Cash Management (LCM)<br />

On November 24, 2007, LCM sold its fixed assets and operation<br />

to vaultex U.K. Ltd, jointly owned by HSBc Bank plc and Barclays<br />

Bank PLc. On the same date LcM became a wholly owned subsidiary<br />

of Loomis when the banks as part of this transaction sold<br />

their shares to Loomis.<br />

The sale of the fixed assets and the operations resulted in a loss<br />

of MSEK 160 in the fourth quarter 2007, due to a lower transaction<br />

price than book value and a provision made for warranties agreed<br />

with the buyer. The provision was made to cover potential claims<br />

from any of the banks customers claiming reconciliation errors or<br />

omissions in their accounts with LcM during the period from June 1,<br />

2007 up and until November 24, 2007, or claims that have arisen<br />

and have been notified to LCM prior to June 1, 2007 but have not<br />

been settled at closing. Such claims had to be presented to LcM<br />

for investigation by LcM prior to August 31, <strong>2008</strong>. After that date<br />

this obligation expired. No additional claims were reported as per<br />

August 31, <strong>2008</strong> which means that the provisions made are<br />

expected to be used in full but still sufficient. LCM has also provided<br />

the banks with a capped standard warranty related to the business<br />

assets, subject to relevant disclosures.<br />

A final settlement has, as of June 19, <strong>2008</strong>, been agreed<br />

between <strong>Securitas</strong> and the Bank of England regarding declarations<br />

made by Loomis cash Management Ltd (LcM) that did not<br />

comply with the rules of the Bank of England’s Note circulation<br />

Scheme (NcS). The amount of the settlement is covered by the<br />

provisions already taken. No further financial effects are expected.<br />

LcM transferred most of its operations to vaultex U.K. Ltd (jointly<br />

owned by HSBc Bank and Barclays Bank) on November 24,<br />

2007, when vaultex replaced it as a member of the NcS.<br />

Spain – Esabe<br />

In January 1992, <strong>Securitas</strong> acquired Esabe, Spain’s then secondlargest<br />

company in the guard services and cash-in-transit segments.<br />

Shortly following such acquisition, the seller in such transaction<br />

filed for bankruptcy under Spanish law. As a consequence<br />

of such bankruptcy filing, <strong>Securitas</strong> has been involved in multiple<br />

litigations with the bankruptcy estate in respect of claims by the<br />

estate relating to the validity of the acquisition transaction and<br />

certain accounts claimed to be due to the estate. During 2006,<br />

final rulings in these litigations were made by the Spanish<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> report<br />

report of the Board of Directors<br />

Supreme Court. Following these final rulings, <strong>Securitas</strong> entered<br />

into settlement negotiations with representatives of the estate<br />

and a final settlement was agreed with the estate resolving all of<br />

the outstanding claims. A provision in the amount of the payment<br />

to be made to the estate under the settlement agreement was<br />

recognized as of December 31, 2006. The final settlement has<br />

been signed by all parties and submitted to the relevant Spanish<br />

court for its approval. The court has finally approved the settlement<br />

agreement between the bankruptcy estate of Esabe and<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong>. The settlement amount has been paid and the agreement<br />

will be implemented according to its terms.<br />

Spain – Overtime compensation<br />

All major security companies in Spain have been compensating<br />

their employees in respect of overtime work in accordance with<br />

a labor agreement covering the period 2005 to <strong>2008</strong>. In February<br />

2007, the Spanish Supreme court ruled that the overtime compensation<br />

under the existing labor agreement was not in compliance<br />

with Spanish law.<br />

The potential exposure in respect of overtime compensation<br />

payable to employees of the security services and guarding companies<br />

in Spain has increased due to the failure of the major security<br />

companies and the local unions to negotiate a settlement<br />

agreement on the overtime compensation. A petition has been<br />

lodged with the lower court in Spain seeking specific guidance as<br />

to how overtime compensation shall be calculated. A judgment<br />

was rendered in January <strong>2008</strong> giving guidelines on calculation of<br />

overtime pay, which substantially accepted the views of the<br />

employers. The judgment has been appealed by the local unions.<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong> will vigorously defend its position in the appeal. A decision<br />

in the matter is not expected until mid-2009.<br />

In the absence of final guidance on overtime compensation,<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong> has chosen to apply the guidelines given by the court for<br />

salary payments to be paid in <strong>2008</strong>. For historic overtime compensation,<br />

the company will await the outcome of the appeal. <strong>Securitas</strong><br />

will have to prepare for several suits from employees and former<br />

employees in respect of historic overtime compensation.<br />

Simultaneously, one industry association commenced legal<br />

proceedings in an attempt to invalidate the current collective<br />

bargaining agreement due to an alleged imbalance created by<br />

the earlier decision on overtime pay by the Supreme court.<br />

In a judgment rendered in January <strong>2008</strong> the court ruled – on<br />

procedural grounds – against the industry association. It has now<br />

appealed the court decision. Judgment in the appeal is not<br />

expected until mid-2009.<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong> Spain is already the target of several labor claims<br />

and the number of claims is increasing. Based on this fact the<br />

management estimates the additional compensation for the<br />

historic overtime claims to amount to MSEK 128 and a provision<br />

of this amount was recognized as of December 31, 2007.<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> report <strong>2008</strong><br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!