28.05.2013 Views

Annual Report 2008 - Securitas

Annual Report 2008 - Securitas

Annual Report 2008 - Securitas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 <strong>Annual</strong> report<br />

Notes and comments to the consolidated financial statements<br />

Note 4. Critical estimates and judgments<br />

and items affecting comparability<br />

The preparation of financial reports requires the Board of Directors and Group<br />

Management to make estimates and judgments using certain assumptions.<br />

Estimates and judgments will impact both the statement of income and the<br />

balance sheet as well as disclosures such as contingent liabilities. Actual<br />

results may differ from these estimates and judgments under different<br />

assumptions and conditions.<br />

Valuation of identifiable assets and liabilities in<br />

connection with the acquisition of subsidiaries/operations<br />

The valuation of identifiable assets and liabilities in connection with the acquisition<br />

of subsidiaries or operations as part of the purchase price allocation<br />

involves that items in the acquired company’s balance sheet as well as items<br />

that have not been recognized in the acquired company’s balance sheet<br />

such as customer relations should be valued at fair value. In normal circumstances,<br />

as quoted market prices are not available for the assets and liabilities<br />

that are to be valued, different valuation methods have to be used. These<br />

valuation methods are based on a number of assumptions. Other items that<br />

can be difficult both to identify as well as to value are contingent liabilities<br />

that could have arisen in the acquired company such as litigation related<br />

items. All balance sheet items are thus subject to estimates and judgments.<br />

Further information is provided in Note 16.<br />

Impairment testing of goodwill and<br />

other acquisition related intangible assets<br />

In connection with the impairment testing of goodwill and other acquisition<br />

related intangible assets, the book value is compared with the recoverable<br />

value. The recoverable value is determined by the higher of an asset’s net<br />

realizable value and its value in use. Since under normal circumstances no<br />

quoted market prices are available to assess an asset’s net realizable value,<br />

the book value is normally compared with the value in use. The calculation<br />

of the value in use is based on assumptions and judgments. The most important<br />

assumptions are the organic sales growth, the development of the<br />

operating margin, the operating working capital requirements and the relevant<br />

WACC, which is used to discount future cash flows. All in all, this means<br />

that the valuation of the balance sheet items Goodwill, which amounts to<br />

MSEK 14,104.3 (13,793.5 and 14,031.6) and Acquisition related intangible<br />

assets, which amounts to MSEK 751.3 (624.0 and 464.2), are subject to<br />

critical estimates and judgments. A sensitivity analysis regarding the organic<br />

sales growth, the operating margin and the wAcc is provided in Note 16.<br />

Valuation of accounts receivable<br />

and the provision for bad debt losses<br />

Accounts receivable, which amounts to MSEK 9,962.6 (9,889.4 and<br />

8,855.6), is one of the most significant balance sheet items. Accounts<br />

receivable are accounted net after provisions for probable bad debt. The<br />

provision for bad debt losses, which amounts to MSEK –354.4 (–324.3 and<br />

–297.0), is thus subject to critical estimates and judgments. Further information<br />

regarding the credit risk in accounts receivable is provided in Note 6.<br />

Information regarding the development of the provision for bad debt losses<br />

during the year is provided in Note 25.<br />

Actuarial calculations regarding employee benefits<br />

such as pensions and medical benefits<br />

Employee benefits are normally an area where estimates and judgments are<br />

not critical. However for defined benefit plans relating to benefits particularly<br />

for pensions and medical benefits and where the payment to the<br />

employee is several years into the future, actuarial calculations are required.<br />

These calculations are based on assumptions regarding economic variables<br />

such as the discount rate, the expected return on plan assets, salary increases,<br />

inflation rate, pension increases and the inflation rate for medical<br />

benefits, but also on demographic variables such as the expected life span.<br />

<strong>Securitas</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> report <strong>2008</strong><br />

All in all, the balance sheet item pension balances for defined benefit plans,<br />

which amounts to MSEK 8.4 (17.9 and 7.0) and which is stated under other<br />

long-term receivables, and the balance sheet item provisions for pensions<br />

and similar commitments, which amounts to MSEK 1,250.1 (946.1 and<br />

1,055.9), are subject to critical estimates and judgments. The Group’s<br />

opinion is that the most important assumptions are the discount rate, the<br />

inflation rate and the expected life span. A sensitivity analysis regarding<br />

these three variables is provided in Note 32.<br />

Actuarial calculations regarding claims reserves<br />

The Group is exposed to various types of risks in the day-to-day running of<br />

the business. The operational risks can result in the need to recognize reserves<br />

for damages resulting from property claims, personal injuries as well as<br />

workers’ compensation claims relating to the Group’s employees. claims<br />

reserves are calculated based on a combination of case reserves and incurred<br />

but not reported reserves. Actuarial calculations are performed on a quarterly<br />

basis to assess the adequacy of the reserves based on open claims and<br />

historical data for incurred but not reported claims. Actuarial calculations are<br />

based on several assumptions. All in all, this means that the balance sheet<br />

items short-term Liability insurance-related claims reserves, which amounts<br />

to MSEK 652.5 (694.6 and 819.0) and is included in Other short-term<br />

provisions (Note 36) and Liability insurance-related claims reserves, which<br />

amounts to MSEK 603.3 (724.3 and 595.7) and is included in Other provisions<br />

(Note 33), are subject to critical estimates and judgments.<br />

The impact on the Group’s financial position of ongoing<br />

litigation and the valuation of contingent liabilities<br />

Over the years the Group has made a number of acquisitions in different<br />

countries. As a result of such acquisitions certain contingent liabilities of the<br />

businesses acquired have been assumed. companies within the Group are<br />

also involved in a number of other legal proceedings and tax audits arising<br />

out of the operations. Further information is provided in Note 38.<br />

Items affecting comparability<br />

Items affecting comparability amounted to MSEK –29.3 (–78.1 and –549.1).<br />

The items affecting comparability that are described below constitute<br />

the most material individual transactions that demand that the management<br />

make judgments that can be deemed reasonable under the prevailing<br />

circumstances, taking into consideration the information that is available on<br />

the balance sheet date. The items that involve the largest elements of<br />

judgement are:<br />

USA – Globe/Federal Aviation Admininstration<br />

Prior to the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (Aviation Security Act),<br />

which was passed in November 2001, the air carriers were responsible<br />

under federal law for providing pre-board screening of passengers. In most<br />

cases, the air carriers contracted with private security companies for these<br />

services. Under the Aviation Security Act, pre-board screening services<br />

were federalized in two steps. The first step consisted of a transition period<br />

where the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) became the party responsible<br />

for pre-board screening and contracted with private security<br />

companies for these services (the FAA’s responsibilities were later transitioned<br />

to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)). The second step,<br />

which occurred in November 2002, consisted of the TSA directly providing<br />

these services by federal government employees. Globe had been requested<br />

to provide pre-board screening services during the initial transition<br />

period and, following extended negotiations, Globe entered into an agreement<br />

with the FAA in February 2002 to provide such services during the<br />

transition period. Based on the performance of Globe during this transition<br />

period, in April 2002 Globe contracted with the FAA/TSA to service additional<br />

airports. During the transition period, the FAA/TSA compensated Globe<br />

based on the governing contract and the invoices submitted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!