linked - Investigating the Terror
linked - Investigating the Terror
linked - Investigating the Terror
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Explosives, and I don't recall specifically what it had said at that point.<br />
The August 1996 explanation came after we confronted Williams with<br />
page U103 from <strong>the</strong> Encyclopedia, and <strong>the</strong> new explanation appears<br />
contrived to accommodate that text. Second, Williams' trial testimony did<br />
not purport to be an estimate of <strong>the</strong> VOD of <strong>the</strong> urea nitrate made ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
at Eglin or by <strong>the</strong> perpetrators. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, it was put forth as <strong>the</strong> general<br />
range for <strong>the</strong> VOD of urea nitrate. The 14,000 feet per second figure was<br />
explicitly limited at <strong>the</strong> trial to smaller quantities, which would be<br />
inapplicable to both Eglin and <strong>the</strong> perpetrators. Third, density was not<br />
<strong>the</strong> only variable mentioned in <strong>the</strong> Encyclopedia; <strong>the</strong> confinement also<br />
varied (paper versus steel tube) and may have had as significant an<br />
impact on VOD as <strong>the</strong> density. Thus, Williams' new explanation is based<br />
on a misconstruction of <strong>the</strong> Encyclopedia. Fourth, Williams' statement in<br />
<strong>the</strong> new explanation that he thought <strong>the</strong> urea nitrate used in <strong>the</strong> bombing<br />
had a high density is speculative. If, as seems unlikely, <strong>the</strong> new<br />
explanation is <strong>the</strong> true explanation, Williams should have given <strong>the</strong> same<br />
information in court as he did in his letter--namely, that <strong>the</strong> VOD for urea<br />
nitrate is about 11,155-15,420 feet per second, but that he thought <strong>the</strong><br />
VOD of <strong>the</strong> main explosive was at <strong>the</strong> high end of that range for certain<br />
specific reasons. The new explanation reflects adversely on Williams'<br />
credibility and competence.<br />
We conclude that <strong>the</strong> 14,000-15,500 VOD range for urea nitrate that<br />
Williams gave at <strong>the</strong> Salameh trial was clearly too narrow, and appears<br />
tailored to correspond to <strong>the</strong> estimates in his report (14,000 feet per<br />
second) and in his testimony (14,000-15,500 feet per second) of <strong>the</strong> VOD<br />
of <strong>the</strong> main explosive used at <strong>the</strong> Trade Center. In his trial testimony<br />
about <strong>the</strong> VOD of urea nitrate, Williams failed in his responsibility to<br />
provide <strong>the</strong> court with complete and accurate information.<br />
(2) The VOD of <strong>the</strong> Main<br />
Explosive<br />
Having told <strong>the</strong> jury that <strong>the</strong> VOD of urea nitrate was about 14,000 to<br />
15,500 feet per second, Williams went on to testify as follows to <strong>the</strong> VOD<br />
of <strong>the</strong> main explosive at <strong>the</strong> Trade Center:<br />
On <strong>the</strong> brief two and a half hour walk-through [at <strong>the</strong> scene of<br />
<strong>the</strong> bombing] I had <strong>the</strong> opportunity to inspect a lot of [damaged<br />
materials]. . . . By putting all of <strong>the</strong>se things toge<strong>the</strong>r and<br />
looking at <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> hole I estimated that <strong>the</strong> velocity of<br />
detonation was somewhere between 14,000 and about 15,500<br />
feet per second, with a little bit of give on each side of that. []