04.06.2013 Views

linked - Investigating the Terror

linked - Investigating the Terror

linked - Investigating the Terror

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Explosives, and I don't recall specifically what it had said at that point.<br />

The August 1996 explanation came after we confronted Williams with<br />

page U103 from <strong>the</strong> Encyclopedia, and <strong>the</strong> new explanation appears<br />

contrived to accommodate that text. Second, Williams' trial testimony did<br />

not purport to be an estimate of <strong>the</strong> VOD of <strong>the</strong> urea nitrate made ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

at Eglin or by <strong>the</strong> perpetrators. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, it was put forth as <strong>the</strong> general<br />

range for <strong>the</strong> VOD of urea nitrate. The 14,000 feet per second figure was<br />

explicitly limited at <strong>the</strong> trial to smaller quantities, which would be<br />

inapplicable to both Eglin and <strong>the</strong> perpetrators. Third, density was not<br />

<strong>the</strong> only variable mentioned in <strong>the</strong> Encyclopedia; <strong>the</strong> confinement also<br />

varied (paper versus steel tube) and may have had as significant an<br />

impact on VOD as <strong>the</strong> density. Thus, Williams' new explanation is based<br />

on a misconstruction of <strong>the</strong> Encyclopedia. Fourth, Williams' statement in<br />

<strong>the</strong> new explanation that he thought <strong>the</strong> urea nitrate used in <strong>the</strong> bombing<br />

had a high density is speculative. If, as seems unlikely, <strong>the</strong> new<br />

explanation is <strong>the</strong> true explanation, Williams should have given <strong>the</strong> same<br />

information in court as he did in his letter--namely, that <strong>the</strong> VOD for urea<br />

nitrate is about 11,155-15,420 feet per second, but that he thought <strong>the</strong><br />

VOD of <strong>the</strong> main explosive was at <strong>the</strong> high end of that range for certain<br />

specific reasons. The new explanation reflects adversely on Williams'<br />

credibility and competence.<br />

We conclude that <strong>the</strong> 14,000-15,500 VOD range for urea nitrate that<br />

Williams gave at <strong>the</strong> Salameh trial was clearly too narrow, and appears<br />

tailored to correspond to <strong>the</strong> estimates in his report (14,000 feet per<br />

second) and in his testimony (14,000-15,500 feet per second) of <strong>the</strong> VOD<br />

of <strong>the</strong> main explosive used at <strong>the</strong> Trade Center. In his trial testimony<br />

about <strong>the</strong> VOD of urea nitrate, Williams failed in his responsibility to<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> court with complete and accurate information.<br />

(2) The VOD of <strong>the</strong> Main<br />

Explosive<br />

Having told <strong>the</strong> jury that <strong>the</strong> VOD of urea nitrate was about 14,000 to<br />

15,500 feet per second, Williams went on to testify as follows to <strong>the</strong> VOD<br />

of <strong>the</strong> main explosive at <strong>the</strong> Trade Center:<br />

On <strong>the</strong> brief two and a half hour walk-through [at <strong>the</strong> scene of<br />

<strong>the</strong> bombing] I had <strong>the</strong> opportunity to inspect a lot of [damaged<br />

materials]. . . . By putting all of <strong>the</strong>se things toge<strong>the</strong>r and<br />

looking at <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> hole I estimated that <strong>the</strong> velocity of<br />

detonation was somewhere between 14,000 and about 15,500<br />

feet per second, with a little bit of give on each side of that. []

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!