04.06.2013 Views

linked - Investigating the Terror

linked - Investigating the Terror

linked - Investigating the Terror

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Q. And have you concluded that that is <strong>the</strong> only possible bomb<br />

that could have caused this kind of damage based on everything<br />

you know or are <strong>the</strong>re o<strong>the</strong>r possibilities as well?<br />

A. Within <strong>the</strong> World Trade Center?<br />

Q. Yes.<br />

A. There was only one bomb in <strong>the</strong> World Trade Center.<br />

Q. No, no. That, I understand to be your testimony.<br />

What I'm saying is was whatever caused it just this one<br />

possibility or were <strong>the</strong>re o<strong>the</strong>r possible bombs as well, not two<br />

bombs or three bombs, but you described a bomb?<br />

A. Yes, okay.<br />

Q. Could it have been ano<strong>the</strong>r kind of bomb or no?<br />

A. Not likely. As I said, <strong>the</strong> bulk of <strong>the</strong> explosive material could<br />

have been urea nitrate with o<strong>the</strong>r things such as ammonium<br />

nitrate dynamite and certainly <strong>the</strong>re was some type of initiator,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> bulk of <strong>the</strong> explosive was, in my opinion, urea nitrate.<br />

Q. I guess it's <strong>the</strong> could have been part that gives me pause.<br />

THE COURT: Could it be ANFO [ammonium nitrate and fuel oil]?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!