linked - Investigating the Terror

act of God or lightning?
At the Salameh trial, Williams testified as follows:
Q. Now, early on in this investigation, because you're the case
agent, you reviewed many of the reports that were written by the
other chemists. Am I correct?
A. That's right.
Q. And you were dissatisfied with some of those reports because
you didn't like the phraseology of the language. Am I correct?
A. Not the phraseology, the format.
Q. The format.
And when we talk about format, the specific part of the format
that you didn't like is when those opinions gave alternate
reasons for finding some residue. Am I correct?
A. That's not correct.
Q. Well, when they said that, say like for urea nitrate, in those
reports when it said, urea nitrate could have came from sewage,
you were dissatisfied with those kinds of conclusions; weren't
you?
A. No, I was not.
Williams went on to testify about making some innocuous changes in the
format of a report other than Whitehurst's June 15, 1993, dictation quoted
above.