12.06.2013 Views

The Short

The Short

The Short

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

516 APPOGGIATURAS, TRILLS, TURNS<br />

which his instructions were interpreted by leading contemporaries, nicely illustrate the flexibility which persisted even<br />

in that period of ever-increasing prescriptiveness in notation. In his operas up to Lohengrin Wagner used a variety of<br />

conventional ornament signs; in the later operas, with very few exceptions other than trills (which according to<br />

Dannreuther were normally meant to start on the main note 948 ), he dispensed with signs, and either indicated his<br />

ornaments with small notes or incorporated them into the musical text in normal-size notes. In the overture to<br />

Raupach's König Enzio of 1832 Wagner employed the turn sign ?. In Rienzi, Der fliegende HollÄnder, and TannhÄuser he<br />

regularly used the sign ? for turns. He does not seem to have employed a different sign to indicate an inverted turn, but<br />

in his later works, where the turns are written out, some begin from above and others from below. <strong>The</strong> Vorspiel to<br />

GötterdÄmmerung, for instance, has inverted turns and direct turns closely juxtaposed. A written-out inverted turn also<br />

occurs in the 1855 version of his Faust overture; this example is particularly interesting, since in the 1844 version of the<br />

overture the turns are indicated by Wagner's usual turn sign. Whether Wagner originally envisaged an inverted turn in<br />

the Faust overture is open to question.<br />

How Wagner wished the turn signs in earlier operas to be interpreted was by no means clear even during his own<br />

lifetime. In Liszt's piano versions of the Prayer from Rienzi and the March from TannhÄuser (Act II, Scene iv), the turn<br />

signs are realized as direct turns. Hans von Bülow, however, apparently without any authority from the composer,<br />

insisted for a while on his Meiningen orchestra performing many of the turns in Rienzi and others of Wagner's earlier<br />

operas as inverted turns. This was the subject of considerable controversy in the late nineteenth century, but though<br />

Bülow later changed his mind, other conductors adopted the habit. Dannreuther reported that at Munich in the 1890s,<br />

for instance, the inverted turn was routinely used in Rienzi; 949 this practice was perpetuated by Karl Klindworth's vocal<br />

score, in which the signs are realized as inverted turns. Wagner himself seems to have added to the confusion over the<br />

meaning of his turn signs, for when present at rehearsals of TannhÄuser in Vienna in 1875, he asked the conductor,<br />

Hans Richter, to take the turns (marked by the sign for a normal turn) that follow the words ‘So stehet auf!’ in Act II,<br />

Scene ii as inverted turns. In the revised vocal score of TannhÄuser (1876), prepared by Joseph Rubinstein under<br />

Wagner's direct supervision, however, these turns were written out as normal turns, and they also appear thus in<br />

Klindworth's vocal score.<br />

948 Musical Ornamentation, ii. 172.<br />

949 Ibid. 174.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!