12.06.2013 Views

The Short

The Short

The Short

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHOICE OF TEMPO 289<br />

articulated, or that underlay many musicians’ comments on tempo, was the degree of deviation from the ‘ideal’ tempo<br />

that was possible without altering the intended impact of the music. <strong>The</strong> acceptable margins of variation cannot be<br />

exactly prescribed, but it is obvious to every accomplished musician that, while it would be inartistic to insist on a<br />

single immutable tempo for any piece of music in all circumstances, music can be performed at tempos so different<br />

from those envisaged by the composer that the character of the composition is completely altered. Thus Quantz<br />

conceded that it would ‘do no harm … if a melancholy person, in accordance with his temperament, were to play a<br />

piece moderately fast, but still well, and if a more volatile person played it with greater liveliness’; 527 yet he also stressed:<br />

We see daily how often tempo is abused, and how frequently the very same piece is played moderately at one time,<br />

and still more quickly at another. It is well known that in many places where people play carelessly, a presto is often<br />

made an allegretto and an adagio an andante, doing the greatest injustice to the composer, who cannot always be<br />

present. 528<br />

Other eighteenth-century musicians were more insistent on the necessity for a composer's tempo to be adhered to<br />

within a quite narrow margin. Kirnberger, for instance, felt that only the composer was in a position to dictate the<br />

correct tempo and that ‘a little degree more or less can do much damage to the effect of a piece’; 529 and he suggested<br />

that for greater certainty composers should append to their pieces a note of their duration. A similar recommendation<br />

was made by Johann Adolf Scheibe in about the same period. 530 <strong>The</strong>re was scarcely a German theorist of the late<br />

eighteenth century who did not stress the importance of finding the right tempo. Among composers and performers<br />

Pisendel was noted for his extraordinary ability to divine a composer's tempo intentions, 531 and Mozart's confident<br />

mastery of everything concerning tempo is reflected in his often-quoted letters on the subject. 532 Most accomplished<br />

eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-century musicians would have been confident that they could discern a careful<br />

composer's intentions with a high degree of accuracy, but the meaning of the clues and instructions to which they were<br />

sensitive were largely forgotten during the nineteenth century and are very imperfectly understood by most performers<br />

of the late twentieth century.<br />

527 Versuch, XVII, 7, §55.<br />

528 Ibid.<br />

529<br />

In Sulzer, Allgemeine <strong>The</strong>orie, art. ‘Bewegung’.<br />

530<br />

Ueber die musikalische Composition, erster <strong>The</strong>il: Die <strong>The</strong>orie der Melodie und Harmonie (Leipzig, 1773), 299.<br />

531<br />

See Türk, Klavierschule, I, §75.<br />

532<br />

See Anderson, <strong>The</strong> Letters of Mozart.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!