12.06.2013 Views

The Short

The Short

The Short

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STACCATO, LEGATO, AND NON-LEGATO 173<br />

occasionally to certain passages and to set off the HIGHER BEAUTIES of the LEGATO.’ 316 And in the revised eleventh<br />

edition of his treatise he seems to have decided that even more emphatic guidance was necessary, changing the phrase<br />

‘the best rule is to adhere chiefly to the LEGATO’ to the more succinct and peremptory ‘let the LEGATO prevail’.<br />

Jean Louis Adam expressed the same thing in French, in his influential Conservatoire method; apparently paraphrasing<br />

Clementi's recently published book more or less directly, he commented:<br />

Sometimes the author indicates the musical phrase which should be smooth, but if he abandons the choice of legato<br />

or staccato to the taste of the performer, it is best to adhere to the legato, reserving the staccato to make certain<br />

passages stand out and to make the advantages of the legato felt by means of a pleasant artistic contrast. 317<br />

Throughout the rest of the nineteenth century the view expressed by these writers remained the orthodox one. For<br />

instance, in Henri Herz's A Standard Modern Preceptor for the Pianoforte it is stated that slurs indicate ‘each note being held<br />

down its full length, and till the following note is actually struck. This is called the legato style of playing, and is that<br />

which is generally used.’ He further commented that 'staccato is to be used only where it is expressly indicated [by<br />

means of dots or strokes].’ 318 Here there seems no longer to be any question of a non-legato touch intermediate<br />

between legato and staccato or even of a ‘non-staccato’. Staccato is only to be employed where marked, and this would<br />

include every type of articulation from highly detached to virtually legato. <strong>The</strong> degree of separation or accent could be<br />

either marked by the type of signs employed, marked by additional performance directions, or entrusted to the<br />

performer's musical understanding, much in the way that a host of authors advised. 319<br />

<strong>The</strong> concern of mid-nineteenth-century pianists with cultivating a legato execution as the fundamental basis of their<br />

performance style finds its apogee in Sigmund Thalberg's L'Art du chant appliqué au piano. And at the end of the century<br />

Hugo Riemann, in his various editions of the Classics, where legato playing is particularly emphasized, reiterated the<br />

instruction that ‘<strong>The</strong> legato touch should always be used, unless specially marked to the contrary’, 320 thus recognizing<br />

no separate role for unmarked notes. <strong>The</strong> pedagogic aims of Riemann's editions necessitated a particularly extensive<br />

repertoire of markings to indicate a graduated series of degrees and types of articulation and accent, but by that time<br />

many composers were scarcely less meticulous.<br />

316<br />

Introduction, 9.<br />

317<br />

Méthode du piano du Conservatoire (Paris, 1804), 151.<br />

318<br />

(London, [c. 1840]), 7.<br />

319<br />

e.g. C. P. E. Bach in the 1750s, Türk in the 1780s, Witthauer in the 1790s, etc.<br />

320<br />

Moments musicaux, ed. Riemann (Brunswick, Litolff, [c. 1890]), preface (copy in the Bodleian Library, Oxford).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!