12.06.2013 Views

The Short

The Short

The Short

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

376 TEMPO MODIFICATION<br />

certain specific types of piece such as fantasias or recitative); and, where it was felt to be appropriate, particular<br />

emphasis was often laid on the use of specialized techniques of tempo rubato, which did not disturb the underlying<br />

unity of tempo. Exceptions to this general rule seem largely to have been confined to a few individuals and schools of<br />

solo instrumentalists and singers. In the course of the nineteenth century a more pronounced degree of tempo<br />

modification, in a wider range of musical genres, was sanctioned by influential sections of the musical élite, although<br />

some of the older established techniques of tempo rubato seem to have been less widely cultivated as the century drew<br />

to its close. During this period the employment of more conspicuous tempo modification, which affected the<br />

steadiness of the beat, spread increasingly from solo and small ensemble performance to orchestral performance,<br />

largely as a result of the advocacy of ‘interpretative’ conducting by Wagner and his disciples. <strong>The</strong> influence of this<br />

approach, persuasively advanced by Wagner in his polemical writings, was closely tied to the growing prestige of the<br />

so-called New German School in the middle of the century, and in due course made itself felt in France, Italy, and<br />

elsewhere.<br />

Despite the evidence for significant modification of the beat by particular musicians during the eighteenth century,<br />

there is little to suggest that musicians of that period explicitly challenged the notion that the beat should remain<br />

fundamentally steady unless the composer decreed otherwise. In the nineteenth century, on the other hand, the<br />

promotion of such ideas, and their practice as a matter of conviction by leading musicians of the day, provoked strong<br />

reactions from those who remained true to the older aesthetic, espoused most notably perhaps by Mendelssohn and<br />

his followers. <strong>The</strong> strength of feeling may partly be explained by an apparent discrepancy between theory and practice<br />

among the champions of freedom of tempo. Although most of those who supported this approach in theoretical or<br />

polemical writings, including Wagner, were insistent that whatever type of tempo modification might be under<br />

consideration it must be employed with discretion, it is evident from frequent complaints that one person's discretion<br />

was another's excess.<br />

Types of Tempo Modication<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are a number of distinctly different ways in which, where no modification of tempo has been indicated by the<br />

composer, the steadiness of the beat can be manipulated by the performer for expressive purposes. <strong>The</strong>se fall into two<br />

basic categories: one involves genuine disruption of the tempo; the other, which is intimately related to improvisation<br />

and embellishment, although it causes a redistribution of note values and accents in an individual strand of the music,<br />

leaves the regularity of the beat fundamentally undisturbed. C. P. E.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!