12.06.2013 Views

The Short

The Short

The Short

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> number of signs introduced during the last few decades of the eighteenth century and the first half of the<br />

nineteenth century was considerable. A glance at treatises published during this period reveals a mixture of signs that<br />

became widely adopted and others that failed to gain acceptance and are seldom encountered in music of the period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> accent signs proposed and employed during these years reflect the growing preoccupation of composers and<br />

theorists with conveying ever finer levels of expressiveness to the performer. As suggested in Chapter 1, it was<br />

accepted in the eighteenth century that the metrical accentuation was often overridden by the accentuation necessitated<br />

by the shape and character of a particular melody (rhythmic accentuation) , and many theorists stressed that<br />

recognition of the accentual character of a melody was vital to musical performance. Musicians working under the<br />

composer's direction and experienced artists might not find this problematic; the average musician was more<br />

dependent on notational guidance.<br />

While late eighteenth-century composers began to acknowledge the desirability of specifying rhythmic and expressive<br />

accentuation more precisely, some musicians considered the problem of finding a means of indicating the desired<br />

pattern of emphasis in a melody. Since this was generally seen as necessitating a degree of accent less powerful than<br />

would have been suggested by such markings as fp, sf, or fz, a number of graphic signs and instructions were proposed<br />

and employed. Most of these either failed altogether to gain currency or, after a period of sporadic use, achieved more<br />

widespread acceptance, though often with significantly different implications than those originally envisaged. Reichardt<br />

proposed ? to indicate where a stress should fall. He considered that it should ‘merely signify that a note, whether alone<br />

or with several in one bowstroke, should be brought out with a somewhat stronger pressure of the bow. Its form<br />

shows, at the same time, the increase of pressure. This has the same effect as a small light point in painting’ [Ex.<br />

3.45]. 176 But in neither Reichardt's own scores nor those of other musicians does this sign seem to have been adopted<br />

in practice, despite Koch's sponsorship of it in his widely read Lexikon. 177 Domenico Corri's use, in his A Select<br />

Collection, of a similar sign ? above a note, to show that ‘particular strength is to be given to it’, 178 was probably<br />

independent of Reichardt. Türk proposed ⌃ to denote an accent less intense than would have been implied by sf. He<br />

described it in his 1789<br />

Ex. 3.45. Reichardt, Ueber die Pflichten, 82<br />

176<br />

Ueber die Pflichten, 81.<br />

177<br />

Musikalisches Lexikon, art. ‘Accent’.<br />

178<br />

3 vols. (Edinburgh, [c. 1782]), i. 8.<br />

NOTATION OF ACCENTS AND DYNAMICS 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!