12.06.2013 Views

The Short

The Short

The Short

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHOICE OF TEMPO 311<br />

Vierteln)’ (rather slow (in crotchets)). 580 Coupled with this increasingly ‘practical’ approach to the role of metre went a<br />

more subjective employment of tempo terms, which is examined further in Ch. 10 below.<br />

Nevertheless, some of the other considerations that were felt to influence the speed at which a particular piece of<br />

music would be performed, besides the relationship between metre, note value, and tempo term, retained their validity<br />

and even became more pronounced in the nineteenth century. <strong>The</strong> slower tempo for church music (which, however,<br />

may have been stronger among Protestant and northern musicians than among Catholic and southern ones) is, for<br />

example, reflected in the metronome tempos (commented upon adversely by Ferdinand Ries) 581 that Spohr gave for his<br />

oratorio Die letzten Dinge. It seems also to be a factor in the very slow metronome marks given for Haydn's Creation in<br />

the Novello edition of 1858. <strong>The</strong> same appears to be true for much other nineteenth-century religious music.<br />

Mendelssohn's metronome marks for his organ sonatas op. 65 (which may perhaps be regarded as falling into the<br />

categories of both church music and ‘strict’ music) indicate that in this genre his tempo terms were to be interpreted as<br />

slower than they normally were in other types of work (compare for instance the common-time Allegro con brio of op.<br />

65 no. 4 at ♭ ? 100 with the Allegro vivace in his String Quartet op. 44 no. 3 at ? = 92, both containing semiquavers).<br />

<strong>The</strong> possibility that a tradition of faster tempos for sacred music survived longer in southern Europe, especially in<br />

Austria and Italy, may be suggested by an article in the Allgemeine Wiener Musik-Zeitung in 1844, 582 where the cathedral<br />

Kapellmeister F. G. Hölzl complained about the ‘modern tempo mania’ which led to such music being performed, in<br />

his opinion, much faster than the composers intended. However, his remark that ‘It may indeed not be an easy task<br />

once more to perform at a slower tempo a work that one has performed at the tempo of many years standing’, and<br />

other such comments, indicate that these fast speeds were no recent modern craze in Vienna, but rather the speeds to<br />

which everyone had always been accustomed. He accompanied his comments with a list of metronome marks for<br />

Haydn's ‘Nelson’ Mass in which he supplied each movement with the metronome mark for the tempo ‘to which one is<br />

accustomed’ followed by that ‘which I regard as appropriate’, as shown in Table 8.5.<br />

Much later in the century a distinct division between German and Italian notions in these matters is revealed by<br />

German reactions to Verdi's own performance of his Requiem in Cologne in 1877, when a critic expressed<br />

astonishment at some of the fast tempos. With respect to the ‘Sanctus’ and ‘Libera me domine’ fugues he observed:<br />

‘—both tempos hardly seemed fast enough for the<br />

580<br />

Miniature score (Leipzig, Eulenburg (EE 3506), n.d.), 94–5.<br />

581<br />

Cecil Hill, Ferdinand Ries: Briefe und Dokumente (Bonn, 1982), 267.<br />

582 Vol. 4 (1844), 334.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!