Pro S. Roscio Amerino
Pro S. Roscio Amerino
Pro S. Roscio Amerino
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
14 CICBRO<br />
accuser ouo;lit to use ? Ought he uot to sliow tliat the man<br />
who is called to answer the charge is characterized by a<br />
unique recklessness, a savage disposition, and a brutish<br />
nature ; that his life was given up to all kinds o£ vice<br />
and villaiuy ; and finally that his whole character was<br />
shattered and blasted in utter ruin. Tou have brought<br />
none of these charges against Sextus Eoscius, not even for<br />
the sake of slanderous depreciation.<br />
39. Sextus Eoscius murdered his father. What sort of<br />
a man is he ? A depraved youug man, a good-for-nothing<br />
led on by other men ? He is over forty years of age. A<br />
veteran assassin, of course, a desperado of much experience<br />
in murder ? But you have not heard this even<br />
mentioned by the accuser. Then of coiu*se it was wanton<br />
indvilgence and a vast burden of debt aud uncontrollable<br />
avarice that drove him to this crime ? From the charge of<br />
wauton indulgence Erucius cleared him when he stated<br />
that he was hardly ever present even at any dinner-party<br />
and he never owed any man anything ; moreover, what<br />
avarice can exist in the character of a man who, as his very<br />
accuser cast in his teeth, always lived in the country and<br />
spent his time in cultivatiug his land, a mode of life which<br />
is far removed from avarice and closely connected with the<br />
observance of moral duty ?<br />
40. What then suggested to Sextus Eoscius the frenzied<br />
act that you charge him with ? " His father," quoth he,<br />
" did not like him," For what reason ? Of course that<br />
reason too must have been well grounded and weighty and<br />
unmistakable : for as it is incredible that a father should<br />
have been done to death by his son without numerous and<br />
weighty reasons, so too it is improbable that a son shoidd<br />
have been strongly disliked by his parent without many<br />
weighty and cogent reasous.<br />
41. Let us return again then to the same point, and inquire<br />
what were these serious favdts in an only son which<br />
caused his father t^ dislike him. But it is plain there was<br />
not a single one. Therefore his father must have been<br />
mad to hate without cause a son of his own begetting.<br />
But he surely was the steadiest man in the world. Consequently<br />
this conclusion is surely clear— if the father was