13.06.2013 Views

Pro S. Roscio Amerino

Pro S. Roscio Amerino

Pro S. Roscio Amerino

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION. 17<br />

grounds were false ones (cahmiiiM),^ not to enter into an<br />

agreemeut with the accused in ordCT to bring about an<br />

acquittal ( praevaricatio), and not to back out of tlie accusa^^li^on<br />

private groundsjtergimxmiw^ . The president<br />

then fixed the tenth~day"frcma the nominis receptio as the<br />

day for the trial. Dui-ing this interval the accused was<br />

generally allowed to remain at large, and, in case his guilt<br />

was manifest, was even encoiu'aged to seek voluntary exile.<br />

If he adopted the latter course, the case was of course at an<br />

end.<br />

On the day of the trial the jurymen were empanelled in<br />

the way ah-eady described, and were put upon their oath.<br />

The prosecutor was generally supported by assistants (m&scriptores)<br />

, and the accused was always represented by at<br />

Ipa^gt^f^pg plparlpv (p qfron^i s) , and also by advocati or<br />

advisers. The proceedingsHbegan with the speech of the<br />

prosecutor, and this was foUowed by that of the counsel<br />

for the defence. The evidence of wituesses on either side<br />

was tlien taken, and this was foUowed by the alf.pvr.niln^ or<br />

reply of-tke prosecutor nry^ c,on"tPir-rftply of the defendanfs<br />

c^jiuael, both in theTorm of short questions a,nd answers,<br />

which tested the patience and skiU of the orators. Sometimes<br />

the trial was not finished on the first day, and it was<br />

then adjourned to the next day butone (coni p erendina tio)<br />

After the altercatio the jurymen voted,~~usually by<br />

baUot, the three possible verdicts being A = ahsolvo^<br />

G = condemno. or NL = non-liquet (" not proven"). The<br />

verdict was decided^ by the majority of votes, and the<br />

accused was not condemned unless there was an absolute<br />

majority (exclusive of the NL votes) against him. Thus if<br />

there were fifty juiymen, at least twenty-six C votes would<br />

have to be given to secure condemnation ; if there were<br />

only twenty-five C votes, the accused would be acquitted,<br />

even if the other twenty-five votes were aU NL. A verdict<br />

of NL also required an absolute majority of votes, so that<br />

the accused was always acquitted unless more than half of<br />

the jurymen votedeither C or NL. A verdict of non liquet<br />

resulted in a second hearing (ampliatio) of the case.<br />

1 See <strong>Pro</strong> Roacio, note on Ch. XIX., line 29.<br />

CIC. EOSC. 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!