14.06.2013 Views

Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) - USDA - aphis

Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) - USDA - aphis

Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) - USDA - aphis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jeffrey N. L. Stibick<br />

Parasites and Predators - TABLE 2<br />

7. Failure to adequately document efforts, no prerelease surveys,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> published records, and failure to properly evaluate<br />

releases<br />

Improving future classical biological control efforts<br />

1. Retesting, with improved rearing methods, those species which<br />

were unsuccessful in the past<br />

2. Trying, with improved rearing methods to raise more difficult<br />

parasitoids that were avoided in favor <strong>of</strong> easily reared species<br />

3. Make more direct releases for field evaluation, rather than<br />

emphasis on laboratory colonization<br />

4. Complete studies on the biology <strong>of</strong> the natural enemies to be<br />

utilized<br />

5. Collect data to document impact <strong>of</strong> these parasitoid releases in<br />

reducing the targeted fruit fly population densities<br />

There has been a gradual shift from classical biological control to<br />

augmentative biological control with mass rearing and the inundative<br />

release approach (Wong, et al., 1991; Gingrich, 1993). This effort may<br />

address some <strong>of</strong> the perceived shortcomings <strong>of</strong> classical biological<br />

control in the context <strong>of</strong> a program effort for dealing with an invasive<br />

pest and it does seem to have its advantages in dealing with a massive<br />

pest population that is thriving in a new environment, by causing that<br />

population to diminish rapidly or even crash. The purpose <strong>of</strong> releasing<br />

such numbers is:<br />

A. To eradicate the invading population.<br />

B. To suppress the invading population over time and be self<br />

sustaining<br />

C. To control the invading population in as low numbers as is<br />

possible and to augment biological control with sterile<br />

releases <strong>of</strong> the fruit fly and/or releases <strong>of</strong> micoorganisms.<br />

For this purpose, Ashley and Chambers (1979) did a study on<br />

maximum rearing efficiency <strong>of</strong> Biosteres longicaudatus, on early<br />

Anastrepha suspensa 3rd instar larvae. They concluded that with<br />

ovipositional cages <strong>of</strong> size 24.5 cm 3 , maximum efficiency is reached at<br />

a parasite density <strong>of</strong> 125 pairs <strong>of</strong> this species per cage, producing<br />

1,896 progeny per 24 hr. exposure period.<br />

Other approaches such as the release <strong>of</strong> pupal parasites to attack any<br />

pupae <strong>of</strong> the target pest that survive other program efforts, such as<br />

sterile release, biopesticides or other biotactical measures and/or<br />

augmented parasitic releases <strong>of</strong> egg and/or larval parasites or<br />

multiparasitism have been discussed. (Wong, et al., 1992; Bautista &<br />

3-14 <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Enemies</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>True</strong> <strong>Fruit</strong> <strong>Flies</strong> 02/2004-01<br />

PPQ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!