Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) - USDA - aphis
Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) - USDA - aphis
Natural Enemies of True Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) - USDA - aphis
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Jeffrey N. L. Stibick<br />
Conservation <strong>of</strong> Predators and Parasites<br />
Small mammals which are known or observed to feed on fruit fly life<br />
stages can be protected by not destroying their habitat or reducing<br />
their numbers through hunting.<br />
Insect Predation<br />
There is apparently an inverse relationship between vertebrate and<br />
invertebrate predation levels. Pupal predation by vertebrates<br />
increases as small mammal density increases, but invertebrate<br />
predation decreases (Cook, et al., 1995).<br />
See Thomas (1995), who stated that ants, rove beetles, and spiders<br />
were found to prey on Mexican fruit fly larvae which have left the host<br />
fruit and have not reached the shelter <strong>of</strong> a pupariation site. The<br />
predation rate was estimated to be 1-5%. Honey ants were recorded<br />
as being incidental predators. Rove beetles were deliberate predators<br />
during summer months.<br />
However, pupae and emerging adults were subject to attack by salticid<br />
spiders, an insectivorous ant, Pheidole sp. and especially exotic fire<br />
ants, Solenopsis invicta, which were effective predators.<br />
Approximately 29.5% <strong>of</strong> the fruit fly population was destroyed (70.5%<br />
survival). This factor was most effective in the summer.<br />
Ants may attack fruit fly last instar larvae on the ground as the latter<br />
look for a place to pupate. Ant numbers may be increased by spraying<br />
hosts with surcose; by encouraging benign (to hosts), host dwelling<br />
honey-dew producing aphids; by providing food for ants during fruit<br />
fly <strong>of</strong>f season periods, or even by transporting ant nests into an area<br />
on a small scale (Weseloh, 1994).<br />
Similar results are known for other species <strong>of</strong> fruit fly. Ants<br />
(unspecified spp.) are responsible for 10% <strong>of</strong> the mortality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
soil-inhabitating stages <strong>of</strong> Bactrocera tryoni in Australia (Bateman,<br />
1968). In Hawaii, Pheidole megacephala attacks Bactrocera dorsalis<br />
larvae in fallen fruit, causing 36% mortality (Newell and Haramoto,<br />
1968).<br />
The interaction <strong>of</strong> ant species and prey may be summarized by stating<br />
that ant species occurring in an area are important agents in the<br />
regulation <strong>of</strong> pests and the rate <strong>of</strong> control varies spatially (ground,<br />
bush, tree) and temporally (winter, spring, summer, fall) within that<br />
area, depending on which species <strong>of</strong> ant is dominant. The dominance<br />
pattern is typically a mosaic <strong>of</strong> territories, as ant colonies partition the<br />
area in accordance with habitat requirements and competitive abilities<br />
(generalized from Thomas, 1995). Ant colonies may be encouraged in<br />
commercial areas by as little use <strong>of</strong> insecticides as is possible and<br />
covering the soil in a grass sward (Bateman, 1968).<br />
02/2004-01 <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Enemies</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>True</strong> <strong>Fruit</strong> <strong>Flies</strong> 3-63<br />
PPQ