30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in Twombly, 2004). The NCCS was established to move the perception from victim to<br />

survivor by Dr Fitzhugh Mullan, a survivor of cancer himself and whose quote is cited<br />

at the beginning of this chapter. He coined the phrase to describe the “ seasons of<br />

survival” in an essay of his own cancer experience (Mullan, 1985). There has been a<br />

recent resurgence of debate about the term cancer survivor. In one study that examined<br />

the “survivor identity” of women with breast cancer, Kaiser (2008) noted that while<br />

some women identified with the survivor label which assisted them in adjusting to life<br />

after cancer, others rejected it and rarely referred to themselves by this term. In my<br />

experience this view is shared by young people who have had a childhood cancer.<br />

However as was reported by Twomby (2004) “no one has yet come up with a better<br />

term”. For these reasons the term childhood cancer survivor is used throughout this<br />

thesis but it is acknowledged that this may not be a term young people who have had a<br />

cancer use to define themselves.<br />

1.5 Structure of the Thesis<br />

Chapter 1 has identified the purpose of this study: to describe psychosocial<br />

wellbeing of childhood cancer survivors. The long term consequences, both physical<br />

and psychosocial following a childhood cancer and/ or treatment have been introduced<br />

and rationale for the study design explained. The aim and significance of the study have<br />

been stated.<br />

Chapter 2 presents a critical review of the existing literature and research on the<br />

aspects of the psychosocial wellbeing of survivors of childhood cancer. A summary of<br />

this chapter identifies the lack of consensus of the psychosocial impact for survivors and<br />

the absence of New Zealand specific research.<br />

Chapter 3 describes the research objectives and the methodological approach for<br />

this study. The research instrument – the MCASI questionnaire is described as are the<br />

four standardised measures of psychosocial wellbeing. The procedures followed in<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!