30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Time since<br />

diagnosis<br />

Abnormal/<br />

Borderline<br />

Normal<br />

Mean 9.6 9.9 0.71<br />

Median 10.1 10.3<br />

Range 3.8 to 14.7 2.5 to 17.3<br />

Surgery N 12 15.0 68 85.0 0.84<br />

Y 12 14.5 71 85.5<br />

Chemotherapy N 3 15.0 17 85.0 0.98<br />

Y 21 14.7 122 85.3<br />

RT N 18 14.6 105 85.4 0.91<br />

Y 6 15.0 34 85.0<br />

HSCT N 20 14.0 123 86.0 0.53<br />

Y 4 20.0 16 80.0<br />

*Pearson’s Chi-Square used for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables<br />

Difficulty with peer problems was associated with cancer diagnosis (Table 7).<br />

Among those with a CNS diagnosis, 36.4% scored in the abnormal/ borderline range<br />

compared to 12% and 12.1% for the leukaemia/ lymphoma and the other diagnosis<br />

groups respectively (p = .02).<br />

Table 7. Peer Problems by demographic and cancer characteristics<br />

Abnormal/ Borderline Normal<br />

Socio-demographic characteristics n % n % p*<br />

Gender F 12 16.9 59 83.1 0.55<br />

M 13 14.1 79 85.9<br />

Ethnicity Asian 1 11.1 8 88.9<br />

Euro 19 16.7 95 83.3 0.26<br />

Maori 5 20.8 19 79.2<br />

Pacific 0 0.0 15 100.0<br />

Age Mean 15.6 15.5 0.70<br />

Median 16 15.5<br />

Range 12.1 to 19.0 12.0 to 19.1<br />

NZDep06 Mean 5.8 5.5 0.67<br />

Median 5 5<br />

Range 1 to 9 1 to 10<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!