View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.4 Implications for Practice<br />
The dedicated long term follow-up programme for survivors of childhood cancer<br />
in New Zealand that was established in 2006 has become an integral component of the<br />
continuum of childhood cancer care in New Zealand. It could be argued that the<br />
multidisciplinary support provided through the Late Effects Assessment Programme<br />
(LEAP) is a factor in the majority of these young people doing so well to date. Though<br />
difficult to assess, a CCS and parent clinic evaluation of the LEAP programme<br />
demonstrated a high level of satisfaction from both survivors and parents and confirms<br />
the importance of ongoing knowledgeable multidisciplinary support (Bartle, 2008).<br />
While it is reassuring that the findings of this study demonstrate that for a<br />
majority they appear socially and emotionally well adjusted, there is a small but<br />
significant subgroup of young survivors who remain at risk for difficulties with<br />
psychosocial functioning. As a group, survivors of CNS disease have been shown to<br />
have the greatest difficulties in this survey. As described by a number of studies,<br />
survivors of CNS disease and CNS directed therapy are one group who are particularly<br />
vulnerable and at risk of significant poorer health outcomes as adults (Zeltzer et al.,<br />
Oeffinger et al., 2006; Speechley et al., 2006; 2009).<br />
Adolescence is a time of transition and adjustment, as all these young survivors<br />
enter adulthood, health problems that are minimal when young may become worse with<br />
age. Many will certainly have to deal with significant long term morbidity and mortality<br />
that increases long after treatment is completed. There is clear evidence that they are<br />
more like to get a second cancer, be infertile and be at greater risk of developing a<br />
chronic health condition than the general population (Armstrong et al., 2009; Meadows<br />
et al., 2009; Oeffinger et al., 2006). In translating the findings of this study into the<br />
clinical setting it is important for health care practitioners to remember that these young<br />
survivors are individuals and assumptions cannot be made that they will all thrive.<br />
68