30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4 Implications for Practice<br />

The dedicated long term follow-up programme for survivors of childhood cancer<br />

in New Zealand that was established in 2006 has become an integral component of the<br />

continuum of childhood cancer care in New Zealand. It could be argued that the<br />

multidisciplinary support provided through the Late Effects Assessment Programme<br />

(LEAP) is a factor in the majority of these young people doing so well to date. Though<br />

difficult to assess, a CCS and parent clinic evaluation of the LEAP programme<br />

demonstrated a high level of satisfaction from both survivors and parents and confirms<br />

the importance of ongoing knowledgeable multidisciplinary support (Bartle, 2008).<br />

While it is reassuring that the findings of this study demonstrate that for a<br />

majority they appear socially and emotionally well adjusted, there is a small but<br />

significant subgroup of young survivors who remain at risk for difficulties with<br />

psychosocial functioning. As a group, survivors of CNS disease have been shown to<br />

have the greatest difficulties in this survey. As described by a number of studies,<br />

survivors of CNS disease and CNS directed therapy are one group who are particularly<br />

vulnerable and at risk of significant poorer health outcomes as adults (Zeltzer et al.,<br />

Oeffinger et al., 2006; Speechley et al., 2006; 2009).<br />

Adolescence is a time of transition and adjustment, as all these young survivors<br />

enter adulthood, health problems that are minimal when young may become worse with<br />

age. Many will certainly have to deal with significant long term morbidity and mortality<br />

that increases long after treatment is completed. There is clear evidence that they are<br />

more like to get a second cancer, be infertile and be at greater risk of developing a<br />

chronic health condition than the general population (Armstrong et al., 2009; Meadows<br />

et al., 2009; Oeffinger et al., 2006). In translating the findings of this study into the<br />

clinical setting it is important for health care practitioners to remember that these young<br />

survivors are individuals and assumptions cannot be made that they will all thrive.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!