30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disease (13% vs. 19%) and lymphoma (11% vs. 12%). Survivors with a diagnosis of a<br />

renal tumour were the one diagnostic group with a higher response than non-response<br />

rate (11% vs. 7%) but the total number was small. In general there were no differences<br />

between the groups based on treatment type (Table 2). Respondents were slightly<br />

younger at age of cancer diagnosis (5.6 years) compared to non-respondents (6.5 years,<br />

p = .02).<br />

In summary, respondents tended to be European, approximately 15 years of age,<br />

from middle to higher socio-economic backgrounds with a diagnosis of leukaemia that<br />

was treated primarily with chemotherapy. There were potentially important differences<br />

between respondents and non-respondents in ethnicity and socioeconomic status.<br />

Therefore, all analyses in the following sections have been weighted for ethnicity and<br />

socioeconomic status (New Zealand Deprivation Index 06).<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!