View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
disease (13% vs. 19%) and lymphoma (11% vs. 12%). Survivors with a diagnosis of a<br />
renal tumour were the one diagnostic group with a higher response than non-response<br />
rate (11% vs. 7%) but the total number was small. In general there were no differences<br />
between the groups based on treatment type (Table 2). Respondents were slightly<br />
younger at age of cancer diagnosis (5.6 years) compared to non-respondents (6.5 years,<br />
p = .02).<br />
In summary, respondents tended to be European, approximately 15 years of age,<br />
from middle to higher socio-economic backgrounds with a diagnosis of leukaemia that<br />
was treated primarily with chemotherapy. There were potentially important differences<br />
between respondents and non-respondents in ethnicity and socioeconomic status.<br />
Therefore, all analyses in the following sections have been weighted for ethnicity and<br />
socioeconomic status (New Zealand Deprivation Index 06).<br />
38