View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
wellbeing and numerous demographic and cancer variables, a suitable corrected<br />
threshold of statistical significance would be less than the conventional p = .05.<br />
Therefore all p-values are presented as actual values and a p value of < .05 was used<br />
only as an arbitrary indicator of significance difference. Internal consistency of the<br />
scales were tested by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. A level above .7 is recommended by<br />
Nunally (1978).<br />
Due to the small number of responders (170) and the broad spread of cancer<br />
diagnosis, in answering the research questions, the groups were combined into three<br />
categories, leukaemia/ lymphoma, CNS tumours and all others. In comparing the<br />
characteristics of the childhood cancer survivors by treatment type, these were grouped<br />
into chemotherapy, radiation, Haemopoetic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) and surgery.<br />
It is important to note that cancer treatment often includes more than one of the<br />
treatment modalities and surgery particularly, is often used as an adjuvant rather than a<br />
stand alone therapy.<br />
3.12 Ethical and Cultural Considerations<br />
Health and Disability Multi-regional Ethical approval was granted by the Upper<br />
South B Regional Ethics Committee for the Health and Disability Ethics Committees in<br />
July 2009 for a period until December 2011 (Ethics Reference Number:<br />
URB/09/05/017). Prior to submission, through the locality assessment process, ethical<br />
approval was granted by the Auckland District Health Board Research Review<br />
Committee (ADHB-RRC) (Approval number: A+4391) and the Canterbury District<br />
Health Board Research Review Committee (CDHB-RRC). Support had been sought and<br />
granted by the Māori Research Review Committees (MRRC) for the District Health<br />
Boards.<br />
In their granting of support the ADHB MRRC queried “whether it was ethical to<br />
only involve English speaking participants in a country that has three official languages<br />
32