30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

wellbeing and numerous demographic and cancer variables, a suitable corrected<br />

threshold of statistical significance would be less than the conventional p = .05.<br />

Therefore all p-values are presented as actual values and a p value of < .05 was used<br />

only as an arbitrary indicator of significance difference. Internal consistency of the<br />

scales were tested by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. A level above .7 is recommended by<br />

Nunally (1978).<br />

Due to the small number of responders (170) and the broad spread of cancer<br />

diagnosis, in answering the research questions, the groups were combined into three<br />

categories, leukaemia/ lymphoma, CNS tumours and all others. In comparing the<br />

characteristics of the childhood cancer survivors by treatment type, these were grouped<br />

into chemotherapy, radiation, Haemopoetic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) and surgery.<br />

It is important to note that cancer treatment often includes more than one of the<br />

treatment modalities and surgery particularly, is often used as an adjuvant rather than a<br />

stand alone therapy.<br />

3.12 Ethical and Cultural Considerations<br />

Health and Disability Multi-regional Ethical approval was granted by the Upper<br />

South B Regional Ethics Committee for the Health and Disability Ethics Committees in<br />

July 2009 for a period until December 2011 (Ethics Reference Number:<br />

URB/09/05/017). Prior to submission, through the locality assessment process, ethical<br />

approval was granted by the Auckland District Health Board Research Review<br />

Committee (ADHB-RRC) (Approval number: A+4391) and the Canterbury District<br />

Health Board Research Review Committee (CDHB-RRC). Support had been sought and<br />

granted by the Māori Research Review Committees (MRRC) for the District Health<br />

Boards.<br />

In their granting of support the ADHB MRRC queried “whether it was ethical to<br />

only involve English speaking participants in a country that has three official languages<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!