30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

wellbeing and numerous demographic and cancer variables, a suitable corrected<br />

threshold of statistical significance would be less than the conventional p = .05.<br />

Therefore all p-values are presented as actual values and a p value of < .05 was used<br />

only as an arbitrary indicator of significance difference. Internal consistency of the<br />

scales were tested by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. A level above .7 is recommended by<br />

Nunally (1978).<br />

Due to the small number of responders (170) and the broad spread of cancer<br />

diagnosis, in answering the research questions, the groups were combined into three<br />

categories, leukaemia/ lymphoma, CNS tumours and all others. In comparing the<br />

characteristics of the childhood cancer survivors by treatment type, these were grouped<br />

into chemotherapy, radiation, Haemopoetic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) and surgery.<br />

It is important to note that cancer treatment often includes more than one of the<br />

treatment modalities and surgery particularly, is often used as an adjuvant rather than a<br />

stand alone therapy.<br />

3.12 Ethical and Cultural Considerations<br />

Health and Disability Multi-regional Ethical approval was granted by the Upper<br />

South B Regional Ethics Committee for the Health and Disability Ethics Committees in<br />

July 2009 for a period until December 2011 (Ethics Reference Number:<br />

URB/09/05/017). Prior to submission, through the locality assessment process, ethical<br />

approval was granted by the Auckland District Health Board Research Review<br />

Committee (ADHB-RRC) (Approval number: A+4391) and the Canterbury District<br />

Health Board Research Review Committee (CDHB-RRC). Support had been sought and<br />

granted by the Māori Research Review Committees (MRRC) for the District Health<br />

Boards.<br />

In their granting of support the ADHB MRRC queried “whether it was ethical to<br />

only involve English speaking participants in a country that has three official languages<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!