30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NZCCS Cohort<br />

Nonrespondents<br />

Respondents<br />

(n=396) (n=226) (n=170)<br />

Age range 0 - 16 0 - 15<br />

Time since diagnosis<br />

Median 9.4 9.0 10.0 0.02<br />

Surgery<br />

No 188 47 100 44 88 52 0.14<br />

Yes 208 53 126 54 82 48<br />

Chemotherapy<br />

No 45 11 24 11 21 12 0.59<br />

Yes 351 89 202 89 149 88<br />

Radiation<br />

HSCT<br />

No 295 74 165 73 130 76 0.43<br />

Yes 101 26 61 27 40 24<br />

No 357 90 206 91 151 89 0.44<br />

Yes 39 10 20 9 19 11<br />

p values test for differences between respondents and non-respondents. Chi-square was used for categorical<br />

variables and Mann Whitney U for continuous variables (non normally distributed).<br />

4.2 Research Question 1. Describe the Psychosocial Wellbeing of Childhood<br />

Cancer Survivors<br />

4.2.1 Wellbeing of Childhood Cancer Survivors (WHO-5)<br />

One hundred and sixty nine childhood cancer survivors (CCS) answered the five<br />

items that comprise the WHO-5 wellbeing scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.87). The WHO-5<br />

score ranged from a minimum of 2 to a maximum of 25 (possible range 0 to 25). As<br />

figure 2 shows, the distribution was not normally distributed, with a negative skew<br />

(Skew = -1.0, Kurtosis = 1.17, Kolmogorov-Smirnov = 0.10, p = .05). The mean score<br />

was 18.25 and the median was 19. The majority (89%) of respondents reported good to<br />

excellent wellbeing. Eighteen respondents (11%) scored below the threshold of 13,<br />

indicating poor wellbeing.<br />

P<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!