View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Study framework.............................................................................................26 Figure 2. Histogram of the WHO-5 scores.....................................................................41 Figure 3. Histogram of RADS2-SF Scores ....................................................................41 Figure 4. Histogram of SDQ Total Difficulties Scores ..................................................43 Figure 5. Histogram of MASC-10 scores.......................................................................43 Figure 6. Percentage of Childhood Cancer Survivors scoring within the normal range across all measures..........................................................................................................44 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Childhood cancer survivor characteristics -data sourced from the NZCCR and hospital demographic database. .....................................................................................21 Table 2. Socio-demographic and cancer characteristics of the childhood cancer survivor cohort and sample.............................................................................................39 Table 3.Comparisons across the five SDQ scales...........................................................42 Table 4. WHO-5 score by demographic and cancer characteristics..............................45 Table 5. RADS2-SF by demographic and cancer characteristics...................................46 Table 6. Conduct Problems by demographic and cancer characteristics ......................47 Table 7. Peer Problems by demographic and cancer characteristics ............................48 Table 8. Emotional symptoms by demographic and cancer characteristics...................50 Table 9. Hyperactivity by demographic and cancer characteristics ..............................51 Table 10. Total difficulties by demographic and cancer characteristics........................52 Table 11. Prosocial Scale by demographic and cancer characteristics.........................53 Table 12. MASC-10 by demographic and cancer characteristics ..................................54 Table 13. Demographics of Childhood Cancer Survivors compared with Youth’07 samples............................................................................................................................56 Table 14. Comparison of WHO-5 score of CCS and Y’07 samples...............................56 Table 15. Comparison of RADS2-SF score of CCS and Y’07 samples...........................57 Table 16. Comparison of SDQ scores of CCS survivors and Y’07 samples...................58 Table 17. Comparison of SDQ prosocial score of CCS and Y’07 samples ....................59 iv
ATTESTATION OF AUTHORSHIP “I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person (except where explicitly defined in the acknowledgements), nor material to which to substantial extent has been submitted for the award any other degree or diploma of a university or other institution of higher learning” Signed: Date: Kathy Yallop v
Page 1 and 2: The Self Reported Psychosocial Well
Page 3: 3.14 Confidentiality and right to p
Page 7 and 8: ABSTRACT There has been increased r
Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
Page 11 and 12: psychosocial effects intersect with
Page 13 and 14: innovative multimedia (pictures, mu
Page 15 and 16: in Twombly, 2004). The NCCS was est
Page 17 and 18: 2.1 Introduction CHAPTER 2 LITERATU
Page 19 and 20: demonstrate a higher likelihood of
Page 21 and 22: data from the Childhood Cancer Surv
Page 23 and 24: 2.6.1 Internet surveys and studies
Page 25 and 26: Aotearoa/New Zealand. The following
Page 27 and 28: could also be reported as a nested
Page 29 and 30: Table 1. Childhood cancer survivor
Page 31 and 32: answered by touch screen action wit
Page 33 and 34: The final survey questionnaire was
Page 35 and 36: 3.9 Standardized measures of psycho
Page 37 and 38: emotional, conduct problems, hypera
Page 39 and 40: programme without destabilizing exi
Page 41 and 42: approved in Crown Health Agencies
Page 43 and 44: questionnaire that was upsetting in
Page 45 and 46: 4.1 Introduction CHAPTER 4 RESULTS
Page 47 and 48: Table 2. Socio-demographic and canc
Page 49 and 50: N 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Sco
Page 51 and 52: 30 N 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Score
Page 53 and 54: Table 4. WHO-5 score by demographic
Page 55 and 56:
RT N Y Mod-severe Depression 9 1 7.
Page 57 and 58:
Cancer characteristics Diagnosis CN
Page 59 and 60:
Table 9. Hyperactivity by demograph
Page 61 and 62:
Table 11. Prosocial Scale by demogr
Page 63 and 64:
In summary, older age was associate
Page 65 and 66:
4.4.2 Comparison of depression in C
Page 67 and 68:
Table 17. Comparison of SDQ prosoci
Page 69 and 70:
Wells, & Scott., 2006), that report
Page 71 and 72:
similar between both the study and
Page 73 and 74:
18years, when the protective factor
Page 75 and 76:
parts of New Zealand have either li
Page 77 and 78:
Key implications for practice inclu
Page 79 and 80:
therapy do not plateau but increase
Page 81 and 82:
Children's Oncology Group. (2006).
Page 83 and 84:
Lusk, C., Delclos, G. L., Burau, K.
Page 85 and 86:
Rosoff, P. M., Werner, C., Clipp, E
Page 87 and 88:
APPENDICES 79
Page 91 and 92:
Appendix B: Survey Participant Info
Page 93 and 94:
Information Sheet A study of the qu
Page 95:
How will I find out about the resul
Page 98 and 99:
Consent Form ACSIS: A Paediatric Ha
Page 100 and 101:
Over the last six months... I have
Page 102:
d) MASC-10 We would like to ask you
show all

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?