A Critical Analysis of 'Real Islam'. Its People ... - Bukti dan Saksi

mouth on the ‘charity’ of European, American, and Muslim states. Some argue the entire pseudo-nation
are paid mercenaries serving in the cause of Islam. For our support and subsidy of the people, Americans
diplomats were targeted and murdered in the West Bank trying to deliver scholarships to needy
Palestinians, and then locals stoned their would-be rescuers. We give nearly $2 billion a year in aid to
Egypt, second only to Israel, while its media openly spews anti-American hatred, and which is in fact the
Arab epicenter of such pollution. For our investment we have purchased not gratitude, but disrespect. The
US and other countries have expended billions trying to rebuild Iraq, while devote Muslim ‘insurgents’
blow up the work as fast as possible killing as many workers as possible. Even before Sept 11th the US
had been the largest contributor of humanitarian aid in Afghanistan and other parts of the Islamic world.
The Taliban were all-to-willing to accept Western aid to further their efforts, just as the Palestinian
Authority is all-too-willing to accept foreign funds in support of its aims. Gullible US/European
governments struggle to comply with extortion requests as Palestinians clamor for ever more money,
equipment, training, and infrastructure. On Feb 11, 2003, The United Nations Relief Works Agency
(UNRWA), asked donating countries for more money to continue its assistance to Palestinians. Its
representative, Hansen, said UNRWA exceeded its $400 million budget distributing food parcels,
rebuilding houses destroyed by the Israeli military and maintaining emergency clinics for the sick and
wounded. It was recently learned than even significant amounts of financial aid provided to Islamic
countries affected by the Dec 26 2004 deadly Tsunami have been diverted to terrorist causes.
Paying subsidies to Islamic states to suspend global Jihad terrorism is tantamount to paying ransom,
in effect temporarily buying one’s own peace and security as a ransomed privilege. But according to
Osama and his ilk that ‘privilege’ expired long ago and cannot be bought back, which leaves even
promoters of such subsidies wondering exactly what it is we are paying for today? With enough money
thrown at Islam, is it even possible to put the Jihad Genie back in the bottle? Any who still think so know
nothing of Islam and its long love affair with Jihad. Payers continue to live in delusion thinking they can
control Jihadists with generosity, whereas in fact extortionists always dictate the terms of such
arrangements, with the extorted continuing to have little or no influence. History has demonstrated
convincingly that societies who pay such tribute are destined to eventually disappear. Those who pay
ransom for peace and security will always find themselves subservient to their new masters. It can never
work, because Islamic terrorists hate us because of their ideology, and filling up the coffers of Third
World governments and the pockets of their despots and cronies will do nothing to change that central,
governing fact.
Bill Clinton promised and delivered huge sums in economic and humanitarian support to North
Korea, including oil shipments, food, and even a light-water nuclear reactor. The American people
received in return a piece of paper promising to suspend development of nuclear weapons. That
agreement, never honored, has no value except as proof that providing blanket appeasement and aid to
hateful regimes is a very unwise thing to do. The policy may yet prove fatal to millions of South Koreans,
if not millions of Americans if/when the rogue state delivers one or more device to proxies lusting to set
them off in the USA. Today technicians in North Korea still chow down on food provided by free
peoples, as they build bombs designed to kill huge numbers of their benefactors. Aid to North Korea still
has not, and will not, result in removing the North Korean threat. Instead it will only serve to prop-up the
very government responsible for the food shortages.
Policies of bribery and appeasement are a slippery slope that strengthens an enemy and weakens the
giver. In light of current realities, all aid should probably now be qualified to insure none of it will be
used, directly or indirectly, to destroy us, or to strengthen in any way militant Islamic societies committed
to our destruction. It’s time to collectively confess that governments that either cannot or will not stop
promoting or allowing such hatred are not our allies, are not even neutral, but are in fact belligerents
whose enmity should be accepted rather than ignored. State department coddling and
financial/humanitarian-aid notwithstanding, nothing we can ever do will make Islamic terrorists love us,
we can only make them fear and respect us. We must ask ourselves, does aid given to these people enable
the luxury of spending their time planning Jihad, or would the militants and extremists be less anxious to
destroy us if circumstances required them to be more actively engaged in their own support? Would the
absence of aid force these able bodied individuals to instead concentrate on legitimate efforts to meet