A Critical Analysis of 'Real Islam'. Its People ... - Bukti dan Saksi

violent opposition to Jewish police or military attempting to put down violence. This approach will always be
deemed weak, and despite the fact that such attempts are always in response to violence, will always be used as
an excuse (pretext) for continued murderous acts by Islamic terrorists worldwide.
6. A combination of methods, including more effectively and ruthlessly attacking and dismantling the
groups using more heavy handed methods similar to Egyptian approaches to terrorists. Increasing boarder
security and travel restrictions between Israel/territories and Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and by sea.
Decreasing access from the Palestine areas by stricter internal border controls (less freedom of movement
for foreign and perhaps even Israeli Arabs). Fences and walls and/or other high tech monitoring systems
that make practical and economic sense. More manned checkpoints with a forgery proof national personal
and vehicle ID/tracking system that makes it easier/faster to identify legitimate individuals crossreferenced
with the vehicles they occupy and any legitimate need/rights to be at a given location.
Occupying or annexing for long periods areas or regions from which the worst terrorist activities
originate. Immediate, irrevocable deportation of anyone involved in illegal groups or tainted by terror.
Relocation and/or massive demolition for areas tainted by terror groups. Targeting leaders for
assassination.
The problems related to a combination of responses are the cumulative problems related to each individual
reaction, and the prohibitive costs associated with implementing a comprehensive Orwellian police state.
Targeting terrorist leadership and recruiters has proven helpful in reducing attacks, but have not stopped them.
7. The Sharon unilateral disengagement plan. Many hope Israel’s just completed unilateral withdrawl
from Gaza and part of the West Bank will appease militants and finally result in real peace. In Germany
during the Second World War, unarmed Jews walked helplessly into the ovens and gas chambers. Jews
say “Never Again” often enough, but the big question of this century is: Will fully armed Jews continue to
paint themselves into a smaller and smaller box, walking carefully but deliberately towards slaughter?
The Israeli government's removal of its own citizens from Gaza will go down in history as either a
suicidal error of huge proportions, or a tactical political/military move serving the survival of the country,
depending on how Israel now responds to the coming provocations of its new defacto neighbor-state,
Palestine. The retreat under fire from Gaza cannot but encourage more terrorism, because the Israeli
retreat has sent an unambiguous signal: Terrorism works. Terrorist groups like Hizbollah, Hamas and
Islamic Jihad have made it clear their campaign to destroy Israel will continue unabated. Even PLO
leaders have declared their intent to continue tried and true methods of violence to rid Jerusalem and the
entire West Bank of Jews. The military retreat is seen by passionate Palestinian Islamists as a signal that
Israel is weak and ready to be pursued and destroyed. The withdrawal from Gaza and parts of the West
Bank will soon enough be followed by a terrorist push to cause even greater harm. Considering Sharon’s
earlier statements and policies, surely one assumes he must understand this.
In 2003 Sharon defeated Labor party candidate Amram Mitzna. At the time Sharon ridiculed Amram for
advocating unilateral withdrawal from Gaza, declaring then: "A unilateral withdrawal is not a recipe for peace.
It is a recipe for war." Later that year he did an apparent Kerry flip-flop articulating a nonnegotiable policy of
abandoning Gaza. To many, this represents betrayal of core principals of Zionism. Whether this is in fact a
betrayal, or Sharon simply accepting the inevitability of war and positioning Israel to fight an unavoidable battle
with the Palestinian militants, is anybody’s guess at this point. Sharon has promised to respond to any violence
with greater force after the withdrawal, which is the only encouraging sign that the man has not lost it.
Unfortunately, there are even more signs that Sharon does not always act in militarily cognizant ways. In a clear
tactical error, Sharon exchanged 429 living terrorists and 59 dead ones for one captured Israeli civilian and the
remains of three soldiers in Feb 2004. Not to mention the unilateral withdrawal from Lebanon five years ago.
The results of these actions were: a) more Israeli deaths as many of the release criminals returned to their
terrorist ways, and b) Hizbollah committed unspeakable atrocities on Israel’s former Lebanese Christian allies
and deployed huge numbers of rockets aimed at northern and central cities. Does Sharon know what he is
doing? It is hard to guess.
The only way Sharon’s evacuation could possibly work to stop Muslim terrorists is if Israel backs up
the Gaza giveaway by loading up the Israeli side of the security barrier with missiles and artillery, and to
fire multiple warheads into population centers for every rocket coming over the other way, and lob even
more shells for every terrorist act inside Israel, …until all Palestinian barrages stop. But somehow that
seems out of character for Israel. Currently only Palestinians are employing brutal but effective methods