A Critical Analysis of 'Real Islam'. Its People ... - Bukti dan Saksi

asic needs of food, shelter, and clothing? We must be pragmatic and realize that the first order of
business of any society is self-preservation. We must without paranoia see our enemy, Islamic Hatred,
clearly with all its roots and support structures, even if part of that structure comes from our own
government and other charitable sources of aid.
To help in raising the standard of living and self sufficiency of others is a noble cause worthy of
pursuit, but common sense and self preservation now cry out for re-focusing those efforts toward more
worthy recipients less inclined to kill us. Certainly there is no shortage of needy peoples in North,
Central, and South American countries, or in Russian and European societies as they struggle to transition
to democratic governments and free economies. So how to respond … do we bury Islamic peoples in
charity, sympathy, goodwill, and understanding? At issue is whether we should be providing logistical
support to any nation where majorities of extreme Muslim people express hatred towards free democratic
nations, and wherein organizations exist, drawn from a core anti-American culture, with designs to harm
us.
When the British retook the Falkland Islands, the fact that Argentina had failed miserably to provide
for the support of their own forces was an important factor in the decision making process for those
beleaguered foot-soldiers to give up the fight, and which ultimately resulted in reducing friendly
causalities and expediting the campaign. This is the nature of war. A military siege, by definition, is to
force an enemy into submission and capitulation by extreme methods, which outside of war are
considered inhumane. Historically, the ‘civilian’ population suffers all kinds of shortages when a
government struggles for conquest or its survival by force of arms. Although collateral damage and
innocent blood are regrettable and should be avoided, an enemy cannot be allowed to cower behind the
protection offered by its own innocent victims. It is incumbent on the peoples who suffer at the hands of
repressive and dictatorial leaders who bring nothing but war, despair, and hunger to their own lands, to
rise up and depose of the scoundrels. The people who suffer must understand that the solution to the
problem is for Muslims to rise up against terrorists in their neighborhoods, including violent Imams
preaching hate, and bring real reform to their religion and culture. Humanitarian aid and rebuilding
activity is normally considered appropriate after capitulation, because logistical support to an enemy is
unthinkable. Yes, it is cruel and brutal, but war is impossible to sanitize to a form palatable to liberal
western sensibilities.
The Red Cross and other international aid organizations did not make humanitarian deliveries to
Japan in the period between Pearl Harbor and Japans unconditional surrender, nor to Germany and Hitler.
Anyone suggesting that food and monetary aid be sent to Hitler in hopes to influence the reform of
Nazism would have been mocked and then sent to the insane asylum. Equivalent outrageous suggestion
get a pass today. On Dec 7th 1941 a beleaguered West realized that pacifism meant suicide, and the
Sermon on the Mount was temporarily suspended in pursuit of War. During the Cold-War no aid was
provided to prop-up communist regimes, which led directly to the downfall of the failed system. On Sept
11th enemies we neither provoked nor sought bring death to us, eating the bread we gave them.
As we struggle to make sense of September 11 and decide how best to fight Jihadists, it would be
instructive to remember the 1801-1805 war that first brought the United States into conflict with Muslim
terrorists from countries in the Middle East. The example of the fledgling US government dealings with
Muslim terrorist pirates in the late 1700’s operating in North Africa's Barbary Coast (and protected by
Muslim nations) demonstrated clearly that paying tribute never works anyway, rather it simply emboldens
them to take further action.
In the late 1700’s it seemed impossible for Muslim states along the Barbary Coast to ignore awkward
American merchant vessels, no match for the speedy Muslim corsairs, traveling through the
Mediterranean. After the War of Independence, the Royal Navy no longer protected shipping from the
rebellious American colonies, and piracy became intolerable. After seizing their cargo and scuttling the
vessels, the pirates would ransom the ill-fated seamen, or sell them into slavery. It was a lucrative for the
pirates, and the Muslim states also dependant on the plunder. The US responded and sent missions to the
Barbary states of Tripoli, Algiers, Morocco and Tunis proposing to pay an annual sum to each of the local