A Critical Analysis of 'Real Islam'. Its People ... - Bukti dan Saksi

agreements with King Hussein, breaking every single one. He went too far when he put out a contract on
the King's brother, wherein the King finally declared war in September 1970 and slaughtered 7,000 of
Arafat's Terrorists. Palestinians call that purge "Black September", often naming Terror attacks after it.
To Israel and Westerners, the Oslo accords were supposed to provide the foundation for peace, but to
Islamists they were never more than a temporary "hudna" intended to be broken from the beginning. Even
after violating one cease-file, when the situation on the ground proves too dangerous for them, it is all too
easy to follow it with another truce. This kind of "Bait & Switch" tactic harks back to Mohammed when
he made the previously mentioned treaty with the Quarish he could not conquer, while he gathered a
much stronger Muslim army and broke it 1 ½ years later. Because of the difficulty he had subduing them,
after they surrendered Mohammed had all 600 men from the city slaughtered, and sold the women and
children into slavery. This tactic is a template still in use because Muslims have enjoyed so much success
with it.
As Muslims are instructed by the eminent Islamic scholar Imam Abu Hammid Ghazali (Al-Ghazali),
who is one of the most famous and respected Muslim theologians of all time: "Speaking is a means to
achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is
unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such
an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible."
(The Reliance of the Traveler, sec r8.2, pg 745 [13] ) By this logic, the praiseworthy, permissible goal of
"making the whole world Islamic by Jihad" sanctifies any dishonest statement made to any non-Muslim
opposing that effort. Muhammad said, "War is deception" and demonstrated this principal in his
numerous Jihadic campaigns. Like Muhammad, it appears that a majority of Muslims consider the act of
lying to non-Muslims in the advance of Islam to be a good work. This right to lie is not immoral in
Muslim minds for the same reasons that give them the right to murder, rape and enslave infidels under the
holy banner of Jihad. Amir Taheri, an Iranian author of ten books on the Middle East and Islam, said
regarding taqiyya, "Muslims have every right to lie and to deceive their adversaries, and a promise made
to a non-Muslim can be broken whenever necessary." [29] . Yasser Arafat was a master in the art of
duplicity, and was respected by his fellows in part because he has enjoyed so many propaganda victories
in his battle against the truth.
In a book of Arabic maxims, novelist Ayako Sono cites proverbs and truisms describing commonly
understood principals of the Arabic culture [30] . The innate principals reduced to familiar sayings are hard
for non-Muslims to comprehend, but are simply common sense for Arab Muslims. For instance, one
popular saying goes, ''A man lacking in cunning is like an empty matchbox.'' Another says, ''A well-told lie
is better than an unbelievable truth.'' Such guidelines and advice flow easily from a culture illuminated
only by the Qur’an. This convenient morality is why few Muslims blink when they hear a spokesperson
deceiving ignorant infidels claiming Islam is peaceful and tolerant. Westerners, accustomed to religious
leaders and spokespersons that strive for accuracy and honesty, are inclined to assume pious Muslim
representatives are similarly predisposed. Muslim representatives are aware of this inclination and
delighted their task of verbally twisting Islam into a form acceptable to Americans is so easy. Although
quite willing to take advantage of liberal sensibilities, behind our backs they are amused at our overall
ignorance and poor awareness of Islam’s mainstream goals and methods.
In mathematics, if A=B, and B=C, and C=D, then it is logical and correct to conclude that A=D. Now
we know that Jihad is integral to Islam, and that war has always been a part of Jihad. We also know that
for Muhammad and his followers ‘War is deception’. Although not generally true in Muslim-Muslim
relations, for non-believers the following same simple logic should always be kept in mind when dealing
with Islamists.
Islam = Jihad, Jihad=War, War=Deception …therefore; Islam = Deception.
It is often difficult to differentiate between "extremist" and "moderate" Muslims core values, as
indeed it often appears to be more a matter of form than sustenance. But by listening carefully to their
spokespersons, some conclusions can be inferred. The "extremists" tell the truth about the teachings of
Islam, and have considerable, indeed overwhelming, textual authority on their side in the Qur'an, Hadith,
and the Sira. The "moderates", so eagerly repeated and invoked, are actually more ill-defined, under-