04.07.2013 Views

A Critical Analysis of 'Real Islam'. Its People ... - Bukti dan Saksi

A Critical Analysis of 'Real Islam'. Its People ... - Bukti dan Saksi

A Critical Analysis of 'Real Islam'. Its People ... - Bukti dan Saksi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 20<br />

Spin …The Art <strong>of</strong> Ignoring the Obvious<br />

As in all wars, this one is also fought with words. Waged for minds and hearts, propaganda is<br />

employed by all sides. It is the age-old struggle for converts to adopt a cause. The stakes are very high, as<br />

it the rhetoric and passion <strong>of</strong> the opposing ideals.<br />

In any debate, to confuse an opponent, the classical approach is by and through obfuscation,<br />

tangential diatribes, and/or classic political spin. The desired effect is to create confusion, to weaken an<br />

opponent’s resolve and momentum through diversionary tactics. It is an age-old approach employed when<br />

ones own arguments have weak moral or logical foundations. The tactic is <strong>of</strong>ten the only option when<br />

tasked with presenting an inferior argument, which cannot otherwise be promoted through persuasiveness<br />

based on reason, logic, or moral clarity. This method becomes the only viable option because a more<br />

progressive concept cannot be beaten by an inferior philosophy without those arguing in behalf <strong>of</strong> the<br />

lower standard first concealing obvious truths in layers <strong>of</strong> fog. On hearing such rhetoric, a reasonable<br />

layperson may detect that there is something wrong with either the message or the delivery, but sufficient<br />

time for careful analysis and appropriate response is seldom available, as expediency quickly sweeps both<br />

the obvious facts with the muck into the past.<br />

Once the audience has been so prepared, one can then make suggestions and <strong>of</strong>fer premises that<br />

would have otherwise been easily recognized as irrational or unconscionable. When carefully prepared<br />

and delivered under the axiom "the bigger the lie, the easier it is for people to swallow", otherwise<br />

outlandish suggestions can result in a mental shock effect, which over time can break down resistance. To<br />

the masses for which the spin was constructed, the net effect is confusion and the blunting <strong>of</strong> reasonable<br />

responses and actions, as well as more <strong>of</strong> an inclination to accept the unacceptable, or at least to tolerate<br />

the intolerable. Indeed, when not properly recognized and challenged, there is the potential that otherwise<br />

good people might eventually accept that good is evil, or that evil means can be sanctified if associated<br />

with a seemingly good cause.<br />

Take the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, for example. Claiming that Israel is the sole instigator and villain<br />

in this passionate and tragic play is a tactic designed to hide many truths in plain sight. The weak-minded<br />

demonstrate personal failure when they bury their heads in the sand, and are akin to the Germans who<br />

"closed their drapes" as the Jews were rounded up. We all see and hear about the things going on in the<br />

Middle East every day, yet many continue to hide behind silly libels against the US and Israel to either<br />

justify continued support for the Palestinian cause and methods, or to remain silent.<br />

In a population <strong>of</strong> 6.3 million, Israel has endured over a hundred suicide bombings. If the same<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> attacks had occurred in the USA (288 Million people), there would have been 4571 suicide<br />

bombings with over 40,000 killed and hundreds <strong>of</strong> thousands wounded (<strong>of</strong>ten maimed for life). The<br />

number killed would be the equivalent <strong>of</strong> twelve ‘Sept-11/Pear-Harbor’ type mega-attacks! Almost<br />

everyone would know more than one victim. Pause …and think about it. The reaction <strong>of</strong> this nation<br />

would likely be more severe and violent than the Palestinians have faced to date from all Israeli actions.<br />

Without second thoughts or significant dissention, our armies would be given marching orders to destroy<br />

everyone suspected <strong>of</strong> supporting the attacks in any way. Political correctness would yield to the logic <strong>of</strong><br />

survival and nearly every American would support any and all means necessary to completely ruin<br />

individuals, organizations, and governments deemed remotely culpable, with collateral damage <strong>of</strong> -much-<br />

less concern.<br />

Truth is truth, to the end <strong>of</strong> reckoning. Spin may distract, but does not diminish her. When "Old<br />

Europe" and our own schizophrenic State Department say, "create a Palestinian state, coddle the Saudis,<br />

don’t <strong>of</strong>fend anyone", it only serves to embolden despots and their terrorist foot soldiers. When we<br />

respond to left-leaning media, our Arab "allies", and the Europeans, we lose moral authority and giving<br />

sanctuary and encouragement to despots and terrorists alike. As with the Israelis, our survival and<br />

democracy depends on us living with both eyes wide open, willing to do the hard things necessary to<br />

protect our children’s future. Islamic extremists, and Palestinians in particular, continually debase<br />

themselves as they bask in their hatreds, blood lust, and thirst for revenge. Ongoing anxiety and suffering

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!