You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Radical Middle | 93<br />
brought in, and the agencies he had been working on. No-one<br />
would give a client a schedule with an unpatriotic name on it.<br />
at worst, heightened jeopardy faced the few bold execs who<br />
supported Frontline – anton roodt at federale Volksbeleggings,<br />
Deon erasmus at Breweries, John Gaunt at Standard Bank,<br />
others who would not welcome a mention.<br />
I was a long time on the phone with Kobus, reading him the<br />
article and the committee’s report as dictated to us. He didn’t<br />
say (as I said to the newspapers), “this ban is stunningly stupid”,<br />
but his line of thought flowed that way. The act allowed him to<br />
suspend a ban pending an appeal. This section had never been<br />
used, by him or any predecessor. Today was its day. This was at<br />
six in the evening. Technically, the ban came into operation at<br />
midnight. Here is a nice piece of trivial history. What was the<br />
only South african publication ever to be unbanned six hours<br />
before it was banned? Frontline Vol 3 No 8, of June 1983.<br />
This was a victory of sorts and I could have hugged Kobus,<br />
but as an air-sanitiser it flopped, or boomeranged. Half the<br />
weekend newspapers had “frontline Banned” and the other<br />
half had “frontline Ban Suspended”. One paper had both, on<br />
different pages. We were twice as public as we might have been,<br />
and mystifying.<br />
On Monday, Kobus produced written reasons, meaning<br />
another burst of reports. Then the appeal Board’s Mrs Van<br />
der Walt did a bit of obliging queue-jumping to sneak in the<br />
appeal on Tuesday morning, so that was round 4 of publicity<br />
surges. Judgment was delivered late on Tuesday afternoon,<br />
in our favour, by which time anybody reading or hearing the<br />
news would notice a small item about a Frontline ban being<br />
made or suspended or unmade, and all anyone knew was<br />
that “frontline” and “ban” went together like Dagwood and<br />
Blondie.<br />
Three and a half years of paranoid propriety was blown<br />
asunder by six words; Inkatha words. We’d run every kind of<br />
dissension you can mention – believing that dissent is a thing<br />
better raised than hidden – and we were banned for a story