12.07.2013 Views

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

RaDical MiDDle - ColdType

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Radical Middle | 93<br />

brought in, and the agencies he had been working on. No-one<br />

would give a client a schedule with an unpatriotic name on it.<br />

at worst, heightened jeopardy faced the few bold execs who<br />

supported Frontline – anton roodt at federale Volksbeleggings,<br />

Deon erasmus at Breweries, John Gaunt at Standard Bank,<br />

others who would not welcome a mention.<br />

I was a long time on the phone with Kobus, reading him the<br />

article and the committee’s report as dictated to us. He didn’t<br />

say (as I said to the newspapers), “this ban is stunningly stupid”,<br />

but his line of thought flowed that way. The act allowed him to<br />

suspend a ban pending an appeal. This section had never been<br />

used, by him or any predecessor. Today was its day. This was at<br />

six in the evening. Technically, the ban came into operation at<br />

midnight. Here is a nice piece of trivial history. What was the<br />

only South african publication ever to be unbanned six hours<br />

before it was banned? Frontline Vol 3 No 8, of June 1983.<br />

This was a victory of sorts and I could have hugged Kobus,<br />

but as an air-sanitiser it flopped, or boomeranged. Half the<br />

weekend newspapers had “frontline Banned” and the other<br />

half had “frontline Ban Suspended”. One paper had both, on<br />

different pages. We were twice as public as we might have been,<br />

and mystifying.<br />

On Monday, Kobus produced written reasons, meaning<br />

another burst of reports. Then the appeal Board’s Mrs Van<br />

der Walt did a bit of obliging queue-jumping to sneak in the<br />

appeal on Tuesday morning, so that was round 4 of publicity<br />

surges. Judgment was delivered late on Tuesday afternoon,<br />

in our favour, by which time anybody reading or hearing the<br />

news would notice a small item about a Frontline ban being<br />

made or suspended or unmade, and all anyone knew was<br />

that “frontline” and “ban” went together like Dagwood and<br />

Blondie.<br />

Three and a half years of paranoid propriety was blown<br />

asunder by six words; Inkatha words. We’d run every kind of<br />

dissension you can mention – believing that dissent is a thing<br />

better raised than hidden – and we were banned for a story

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!